Progress and future prospects of CFD in aerospace - Wind tunnel and beyond

Progress in Aerospace Sciences

Volumn 41, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 455-470

  Fujii, Kozo ^a  

^a JAPAN AEROSPACE EXPLORATION AGENCY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; DATABASE SYSTEMS; NAVIER STOKES EQUATIONS; WIND TUNNELS;

EVALUATION METHODS; LARGE EDDY SIMULATION (LES);

AEROSPACE APPLICATIONS;

EID: 27644472417     PISSN: 03760421     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.paerosci.2005.09.001     Document Type: Review

References (39)

1. Lynch FT. Chapter II Commercial transports - aerodynamic design for cruise performance efficiency. In: D. Nixon, editor. Transonic aerodynamics. Prog Astro Aero 1982;81 [chapter II].
2. Chapman D. Opening remarks. In: Proceedings of the workshop on future computer requirements for computational aerodynamics, NASA CP 2032; 1978.
3. Committee of AIAA The year in review: fluid dynamics and applied aerodynamics Aerosp Am December 1986
4. K. Fujii, and S. Obayashi Navier-Stokes simulations of transonic flows over a practical wing configuration AIAA J 25 3 1987 369 370
5. K. Fujii, and S. Obayashi Navier-Stokes simulations of transonic flows over a wing fuselage combination AIAA J 25 12 1987 1587 1596
6. Murman EM. Challenges in the better, cheaper era of aeronautical design engineering and manufacturing. In: Proceedings of the 22nd international congress of aeronautical sciences, Harrogate, UK; August 2000 [CD-ROM].
7. Thomas L, Taylor SL, Anderson WK. Navier-Stokes computations of vortical flows over low aspect ratio wings. AIAA paper no. 87-0207; 1987.
8. J.A. Ekaterinaris, and L.B. Schiff Numerical prediction of vortical flow over slender delta wings J Aircr 30 6 1993
9. Hummel D. On the vortex formation over a slender wing at large angles of incidence, high angle of attack aerodynamics. AGARD-CP-247, paper no. 15; 1978.
10. K. Fujii, S. Gavali, and T.L. Hoist Evaluation of Navier-Stokes and Euler solutions for leading edge separation vortices Int J Num Meth Fluids 8 10 1988 1319 1329
11. Fujii K, Kutler P. Numerical simulation of leading-edge the separation vortex for a wing and strake-wing configuration. In: Proceedings of the AIAA sixth computational fluid dynamics conference, Danvers, MA, USA, July 1983. AIAA paper no. 83-1908-CP.
12. K. Fujii, and L.B. Schiff Numerical simulations of vortical flows over a strake-delta wing AIAA J 27 9 1989 1153 1162
13. Horie T, Fujii K, Hattori N. Numerical simulations of leading-edge separation vortices. In: Proceedings of the JSASS 15th international sessions in 39th aircraft symposium incorporating second Japan-Korea aerospace technology symposium, 30 October 2001.
14. P. Spalart Strategies for turbulence modeling and simulations Int J Heat Fluid Flow 21 2000
15. P.C. Mellen, J. Frohlich, and W. Rodi Lessons from LESFOIL project on large-eddy simulation of flow around an airfoil AIAA J 41 4 2003 573 581
16. I. Mary, and P. Sagaut Large eddy simulation of flow around an airfoil near stall AIAA J 40 6 2002 1139 1145
17. Dahlstron S, Davidson L. Large eddy simulation of the flow around an airfoil. AIAA paper no. 2001-0425; 2001.
18. Spalart PR, Allmaras SR. A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows. AIAA paper no. 92-0439; 1992.
19. N.J. Georgiadis, and J.I.D. Alexander Reshotko EHybrid Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes/large-eddy simulations of supersonic turbulent mixing AIAA J 41 2 2003 218 229
20. K.S. Lele Compact finite difference schemes with spectral-like resolution J Comput Phys 103 1992 16 42
21. McCollough GB, Gault DE. Examples of three representative types of airfoil-section stall at low speed. NACATN2502; 1951.
22. McCollough GB, Gault DE. Boundary-layer and stalling characteristics of the NACA64A006 Airfoil [27] Section. NACA TNI923; 1949.
23. S. Kawai, and K. Fujii Analysis and prediction of thin-airfoil stall phenomena with hybrid turbulence methodology AIAA J 43 5 2005 953 961
24. T. Arasawa, K. Fujii, and K. Miyaji High-order compact difference scheme applied to double-delta wing vortical flows J Aircr 41 4 2004 953 957
25. Mitchell A, Molton P, Barberis D, Delery D. Characterization of vortex breakdown by flow field and surface measurement. AIAA paper no. 2000-0788; 2000.
26. Mitchell A, Morton S, Forsythe J. Analysis of delta wing vortical substructures using detached-eddy simulation. AIAA paper no. 2002-2968; 2002.
27. Visbal MR, Gordnier GE. On the structure of the shear-layer emanating from a swept leading edge at angle of attack. AIAA paper no. 2003-4016; 2003.
28. J.L. Herrin, and J.C. Dutton Supersonic base flow experiments in the near-wake of a cylindrical afterbody AIAA J 32 1 1994
29. S. Kawai, and K. Fujii Computational study of a supersonic base flow using hybrid turbulence methodology AIAA J 43 6 2005 1265 1275
30. M.J. Warfield The year in review, applied aerodynamics Aerosp Am December 2001 12 13
31. K. Fujimoto, and K. Fujii Assessment of CFD estimation of aerodynamic characteristics of basic reusable rocket configurations Trans Jpn Soc Aeronaut Space Sci 48 159 2005
32. Fujimoto K, Fujii K. Computational analysis of the aerodynamic characteristics of capsule configurations toward the development of reusable rockets. J Spacecr Rockets 2005; to appear.
33. Tsukada H, Fujimoto K, Nonomura T, Miyaji K, Fujii K. Numerical analysis of the aerodynamic characteristics of SSTO configurations with an aerospike nozzle. AIAA paper no. 2005-1043; 2005.
34. Fujii K, Miyaji K. WEB-CFD and beyond-CFD for non-CFD researchers. AIAA paper no. 2002-0753; 2002.
35. Aftosmis MJ, Berger MJ, Melton JE. Robust and efficient Cartesian mesh generation for component-based geometry. AIAA paper no. 97-0196; 1997.
36. Z.J. Wang, and R.F. Chen Anisotropic solution-adaptive viscous Cartesian grid method for turbulent flow simulation AIAA J 40 10 2002 1969 1978
37. Rogers SE, Aftosmis MJ, Pandya SA, Chaderjan NM, Tejnil E, Ahmad JU. Automated CFD parameter studies on distributed parallel computers.AIAA paper no. 2003-4229; 2003.
38. Murman SM, Aftosmis MJ, Berger MJ. Implicit approaches for moving boundaries in a 3-D Cartesian method. AIAA paper no. 2003-1119; 2003.
39. Chaderjian NM, Rogers SE, Aftosmis MJ, Pandya SA, Ahmad JU, Tejnil E. Automated CFD database generation for a 2nd generation glide-back booster. AIAA paper no. 2003-3788; 2003.