Vegetation diversity increases species richness of leaf-decaying fungal communities in woodland streams

Archiv fur Hydrobiologie

Volumn 164, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 217-235

  Laitung, Beryl ^a   Chauvet, Eric ^a  

^a CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FUNGUS; LEAF LITTER; SPECIES RICHNESS; STREAM; WOODLAND;

CORYLUS AMERICANA; FAGUS; QUERCUS;

EID: 27544505016     PISSN: 00039136     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1127/0003-9136/2005/0164-0217     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. BÄRLOCHER, F. (1992): The ecology of aquatic hyphomycetes. - Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
2. BENFIELD, E. F. (1997): Comparison of litterfall input to streams. - J. North. Amer. Benthol. Soc. 16: 104-108.
3. CASGRAIN, P. & LEGENDRE, P. (2001): The R Package for Multivariate and Spatial Analysis, version 4.0 d5. User's manual. - Département des sciences biologiques, Université de Montréal. http://www.fas. umontreal.ca/BIOL/legendre/.
4. COLWELL, R. K. (1997): EstimateS: Statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Version 5. User's Guide and application published at http://viceroy.eeb.uconn.edu/estimates.
5. CUMMINS, K. W., WILZBACH, M. A., GATES, D. M., PERRY, J. B. & TALIAFERRO, W. B. (1989): Shredders and riparian vegetation. - Bioscience 39: 24-30.
6. FABRE, E. (1996): Relations between aquatic hyphomycete communities and riparian vegetation in 3 Pyrenean streams. - C. R. Acad. Sc. Paris 319: 107-111.
7. GESSNER, M. O. (1997): Fungal biomass, production and sporulation associated with particulate organic matter in streams. - Limnetica 13: 33-44.
8. GESSNER, M. O., BÄRLOCHER, F. & CHAUVET, E. (2003): Qualitative and quantitative analyses of aquatic hyphomycetes in streams, pages 127-157. - In: TSUI, C. K. M. & HYDE, K. D. (eds): Freshwater Mycology. - Fungal Diversity Press, Hong Kong.
9. GESSNER, M. O., THOMAS, M., JEAN-LOUIS, A.-M. & CHAUVET, E. (1993): Stable successional patterns of aquatic hyphomycetes on leaves decaying in a summer cool stream. - Mycol. Res. 97: 163-172.
10. GOMI, T., SIDLE, R. C. & RICHARDSON, J. S. (2002): Understanding processes and downstream linkages of headwater systems. - Bioscience 52: 905-916.
11. GÖNCZOL, J., RÉVAY, A. & CSONTOS, P. (2001): Effect of sample size on the detection of species and conidial numbers of aquatic hyphomycetes collected by membrane filtration. - Arch. Hydrobiol. 150: 677-691.
12. _ (1999): Studies on the aquatic Hyphomycetes of the Morgó stream, Hungary. I. Longitudinal changes of species diversity and conidial concentration. - Arch. Hydrobiol. 144: 473-493.
13. GULIS, V. (2001): Are there any substrate preferences in aquatic hyphomycetes? - Mycol. Res. 105: 1088-1093.
14. HAGAN, J. M. & GROVE, S. L. (1999): Coarse woody debris. - J. For. 97: 6-11.
15. HIEBER, M. & GESSNER, M. O. (2002): Contribution of stream detritivores, fungi and bacteria to leaf breakdown based on biomass estimates. - Ecology 83: 1026-1038.
16. IQBAL, S. H. & WEBSTER, J. (1973): The trapping of aquatic hyphomycete spores by air bubbles. - Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 60: 37-48.
17. INGOLD, C. T. (1942): Aquatic hyphomycetes of decaying alder leaves. - Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 25: 339-417.
18. LAITUNG, B., CHAUVET, E., FEAU, N., FÈVE, K., CHIKHI, L. & GARDES, M. (2004): Genetic diversity in Tetrachaetum elegans, a mitosporic aquatic fungus. - Mol. Ecol. 13: 1679-1692.
19. LAITUNG, B., PRETTY, J. L., CHAUVET, E. & DOBSON, M. (2002): Response of aquatic hyphomycete communities to enhanced stream retention in areas impacted by commercial forestry. - Freshwat. Biol. 47: 313-323.
20. LAVELLE, P. (1986): Mutualistic associations with soil microflora and specific richness in the tropics: the first link hypothesis. - C. R. Acad. Sc. Paris 302: 11-14.
21. LEGENDRE, L. & LEGENDRE, P. (1979): Écologie numérique. Tome 2: La structure des données écologiques. - Masson, Paris; les Presses de l'Université du Québec.
22. MALTBY, L. (1992): Detritus processing, pages 331-353. - In: CALOW, P. & PETTS, G. E. (eds): The rivers handbook. Hydrological and ecological principles, Vol. 1. - Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.
23. MURPHY, J. F. & GILLER, P. S. (2000): Seasonal dynamics of macroinvertebrate assemblages in the benthos and associated with detritus packs in two low-order streams with different riparian vegetation. - Freshwat. Biol. 43: 617-631.
24. NIKOLCHEVA, L. G., COCKSHUTT, A. M. & BÄRLOCHER, F. (2003): Determining diversity of freshwater fungi on decaying leaves: comparison of traditional and molecular approaches. - Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69: 2548-2554.
25. PETERSEN, R. C. & CUMMINS, K. W. (1974): Leaf processing in a woodland stream. - Freshwat. Biol. 4: 343-368.
26. POZO, J., GONZALES, E., DIEZ, J. R., MOLINERO, J. & ELOSEGUI, A. (1997): Inputs of particulate organic matter to streams with different riparian vegetation. - J. N. Amer. Benthol. Soc. 16: 602-611.
27. PROCHAZKA, K., STEWART, B. A. & DAVIES, B. R. (1991): Leaf litter retention and its implications for shredder distribution in two headwater streams. - Arch. Hydrobiol. 120: 315-325.
28. ROBINSON, C. T., TOCKNER, K. & WARD, J. (2002): The fauna of dynamic riverine landscapes. - Freshwat. Biol. 47: 661-677.
29. SHANNON, C. E. & WEAVER, W. (1949): The mathematical theory of communication. - University of Illinois Press, Urbana, USA.
30. SHEARER, C. A. & WEBSTER, J. (1985): Aquatic hyphomycete communities in the river Teign. 1. Longitudinal distribution patterns. - Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 84: 489-501.
31. SMITH, E. P. & VAN BELLE, G. (1984): Non parametric estimation of species richness. - Biometrics 40: 119-129.
32. StatSoft France (1997): Statistica pour Windows. [Manuel du Programme]: StatSoft France, 31, cours des Juilliottes, 94700 Maisons-Alfort.
33. SUBERKROPP, K. (1992): Interactions with invertebrates. - In: BÄRLOCHER, F. (ed.): The ecology of aquatic hyphomycetes. - Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 118-134.
34. SYSTAT: Statistics, version 5.2 (1992) - Evanston, IL: SYSTAT, Inc., 724 pp.
35. THOMAS, K., CHILVERS, G. A. & NORRIS, R. H. (1992): Aquatic hyphomycetes from different substrates: substrate preference and seasonal occurrence. - Aust. J. Mar. Freshwat. Res. 43: 491-509.
36. TILMAN, D. (1999): The ecological consequences of changes in biodiversity: a search for general principles. - Ecology 80: 1455-1474.
37. WALLACE, J. B., EGGERT, S. L., MEYER, J. L. & WEBSTER, J. R. (1999): Effects of resource limitation on a detrital-based ecosystem. - Ecol. Monogr. 69: 409-442.
38. WARDLE, D. A., GILLER, K. E. & BARKER, G. M. (1999): The regulation and functional significance of soil biodiversity in agrosystems. - In: WOOD, D. & LENNE, J. (eds): Agrobiodiversity. - CAB International, Wallingford, pp. 87-121.
39. WEBSTER, J. & DESCALS, E. (1981): Morphology, distribution, and ecology of conidial fungi in Freshwater habitats. - In: COLE, G. C. & KENDRICK, B. (eds): 1: Biology of the Conidial Fungi. - Academic Press, London, pp. 295-355.