The impact of duplicate orders on demand estimation and capacity investment

Management Science

Volumn 51, Issue 10, 2005, Pages 1505-1518

  Armony, Mor ^a   Plambeck, Erica L ^b  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Distribution channels; Duplicate ordering; Maximum likelihood estimation; Queueing systems; Reneging

Indexed keywords

DISTRIBUTION CHANNELS; DUPLICATE ORDERING; QUEUING SYSTEMS; RENGAGING;

CUSTOMER SATISFACTION; ERROR ANALYSIS; INVENTORY CONTROL; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION;

SALES;

EID: 27544504473     PISSN: 00251909     EISSN: 15265501     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1050.0371     Document Type: Review

References (35)

1. Anupindi, R., Y. Bassok. 1999. Centralization of stocks: Retailers vs. manufacturer. Management Sci. 45 178-191.
2. Anupindi, R., M. Dada, S. Gupta. 1998. Estimation of consumer demand with stock-out based substitution: An application to vending machine products. Marketing Sci. 17 406-423.
3. Armony, M., E. Plambeck, S. Seshadri. 2005. Convexity properties and comparative statics for M/M/S queues with balking and reneging. Working paper, New York University, New York.
4. Azoury, K. S. 1985. Bayes solution to dynamic inventory models under unknown demand distribution. Management Sci. 31 1150-1160.
5. Business Week. 2001. Management lessons from the bust. (August 27) 104-110.
6. Business Week. 2002a. Cisco: Behind the hype. (January 22).
7. Business Week. 2002b. Without chips, the economy is harder to read. (May 6).
8. Cachon, G. P. 2001. Stock wars: Inventory competition in a twoechelon supply chain with multiple retailers. Oper. Res. 49 658-674.
9. Cachon, G. P., A. G. Kok. 2002. How to (and how not to) estimate the salvage value in the newsvendor model. Working paper, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
10. Cachon, G. P., M. A. Lariviere. 1999. Capacity choice and allocation: Strategic behavior and supply chain performance. Management Sci. 45 1091-1108.
11. Chua, I.-P. 2003. Conversation with iGINE Vice-President of Operations. (May 21).
12. Daley, D. J., L. D. Servi. 2001. Estimating customer loss rates from transactional data. Working paper, GTE Laboratories, Waltham, MA.
13. Ding, X., M. C. Puterman, A. Bisi. 2002. The censored newsvendor and the optimal acquisition of information. Oper. Res. 50 517-527.
14. Duffie, D., P. Glynn. 2004. Estimation of continuous-time Markov processes sampled at random times. Econometrica 72 1773-1808.
15. Elliott, R., L. Aggoun, J. Moore. 1995. Hidden Markov Models: Estimation and Control. Springer, New York, 35-76.
16. Hansen, L., J. Scheinkman. 1995. Back to the future: Generating moment implications for continuous time Markov processes. Econometrica 63 767-804.
17. Kothari, T. 2001. Conversation with Cisco vice president for distribution channels. (June 7).
18. Lariviere, M. A., E. L. Porteus. 1999. Stalking information: Bayesian inventory management with unobserved lost sales. Management Sci. 45 346-363.
19. Larson, C. E., L. J. Olson, S. Sharma. 2001. Optimal inventory policies when the demand distribution is not known. J. Econom. Theory 101 281-300.
20. Lee, H. L., V. Padmanabhan, S. Whang. 1997. Information distortion in a supply chain: The bullwhip effect. Management Sci. 43 546-558.
21. Li, L. 1992. The role of inventory in delivery time competition. Management Sci. 38 182-197.
22. Lippman, S. A., K. F. McCardle. 1997. The competitive newsboy. Oper. Res. 45 54-65.
23. Lovejoy, W. S. 1990. Myopic policies for some inventory models with uncertain demand distribution. Management Sci. 36 724-738.
24. Lovejoy, W. S. 1992. Stopped myopic policies in some inventory models with generalized demand processes. Management Sci. 38 688-707.
25. Mahajan, S., G. van Ryzin. 2001. Inventory competition under dynamic consumer choice. Oper. Res. 49 646-657.
26. Mandelbaum, A., S. Zeltyn. 1998. Estimating characteristics of queueing networks. Queueing Systems 29 75-197.
27. Netessine, S., N. Rudi. 2003. Centralized and competitive inventory models with demand substitution. Oper. Res. 51 329-335.
28. Netessine, S., N. Rudi, Y. Wang. 2001. Dynamic inventory competition and customer retention. Working paper, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
29. Parlar, M. 1988. Game theoretic analysis of the substitutable product inventory problem with random demand. Naval Res. Logist. 35 397-409.
30. Ryan, S. M. 2003. Capacity expansion with lead times and autocor-related random demand. Naval Res. Logist. 50 167-183.
31. Scarf, H. E. 1959. Bayes solution of the statistical inventory problem. Ann. Math. Statist. 30 346-363.
32. Thurm, S. 2001a. Missed signals: Behind Cisco's woes are some wounds of its own making. Wall Street Journal (April 1).
33. Thurm, S. 2001b. Cisco expects tough times for rest of year. Wall Street Journal (August 8).
34. Toktay, L. B., L. M. Wein. 2001. Analysis of a forecasting-production-inventory system with stationary demand. Management Sci. 47 1268-1281.
35. Van Mieghem, J. A. 2003. Capacity management, investment, and hedging: Review and recent developments. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management 5 269-302.