Task-invariant aspects of goodness in perceptual representation

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology

Volumn 58, Issue 7, 2005, Pages 1295-1310

  Lachmann, Thomas ^a,b   Van Leeuwen, Gees ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^b RIKEN BRAIN SCIENCE INSTITUTE   (Japan)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SUNDERLAND   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; REACTION TIME; REVIEW; VISION;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; REACTION TIME; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 27544468748     PISSN: 02724987     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02724980443000629     Document Type: Review

References (36)

1. Ashby, F. G., & Maddox, W. T. (1990). Integrating information from separable psychological dimensions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 598-612.
2. Bamber, D. (1969). Reaction time and error rates for "same"-"different" judgments of multidimensional stimuli. Perception & Psychophysics, 6, 169-174.
3. Checkosky, S., & Whitlock, D. (1973). The effects of pattern Goodness on recognition time in a memory search task. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 100, 341-348.
4. Chignell, M. H., & Krueger, L. E. (1984). Further evidence for priming in perceptual matching: Temporal, not spatial, separation enhances the fast-same effect. Perception & Psychophysics, 36, 257-265.
5. Clement, D. E., & Carpenter, J. S. (1970). Relative discriminability of visually presented letter pairs using a same-different choice-reaction time task. Psychonomic Science, 20, 363-365.
6. Eriksen, C. W., O'Hara, W. P., & Eriksen, B. A. (1982). Response competition effects in same-different judgments. Perception & Psychophysics, 32, 261-270.
7. Eviatar, Z. (1993). Same and different: How do we tell them apart? [In Hebrew]. Israel Journal of Psychology, 3, 118-125.
8. Eviatar, Z., Zaidel, E., & Wickens, T. (1994). Nominal and physical criteria in same-different judgments. Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 62-72.
9. Farell, B. (1985). "Same-different"-judgments: A review of current controversies in perceptual comparisons. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 419-456.
10. Friederici, A. D., & Lachmann, T. (2002). From language to reading and reading disability: Cognitive functions and their neural basis. In E. Witruk, A. D. Friederici, & T. Lachmann (Eds.), Basic functions of language, reading, and reading disability (pp. 9-21). Boston: Kluwer.
11. Garner, W. R. (1962). Uncertainty and structure as psychological concepts. New York: Wiley.
12. Garner, W. R., & Clement, D. E. (1963). Goodness of pattern and pattern uncertainty. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 2, 446-452.
13. Geissler, H.-G. (1985). Sources of seeming redundancy in temporally quantizized information processing. In G. d'Ydewalle (Ed.), Cognition, information processing & motivation (pp. 233-241). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
14. Geissler, H.-G. (1987). Guided inference: Components of task-dependence in human information processing. In E. van der Meer & J. Hoffmann (Eds.), Knowledge aided information processing (pp. 221-240). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
15. Geissler, H.-G. (2001). Is there a psychophysics of task-related structural representations? In E. Sommerfeld, R. Kompass, & T. Lachmann (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Society for Psychophysics (pp. 2-17). Leipzig, Germany: International Society for Psychophysics.
16. Geissler, H.-G. (2004). Functional architectures in structural recognition and the role of "seeming redundancy". In C. Kaernbach, E. Schröger, & H. Müller (Eds.), Psychophysics beyond sensation (pp. 157-196). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
17. Geissler, H.-G., & Buffart, H. (1985). Task-dependency and quantized processing in classification. In G. d'Ydewalle (Ed.), Cognitive information processing & motivation (pp. 277-294). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
18. Geissler, H.-G., & Puffe, M. (1983). The inferential basis of classification: From perceptual to memory codes. Part 2: Experiments on discrete feature processing. In H.-G. Geissler et al. (Eds.), Modern issues in perception (pp. 106-124). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
19. Gottschaldt, K. (1926). Über den Einfluß der Erfahrung auf die Wahrnehmung von Figuren. Teil I: Über den Einfluß gehäufter Einprägung von Figuren auf ihre Sichtbarkeit in umfassenden Konfigurationen [About the influence of experience to the perception of figures]. Psychologische Forschung / Psychological Research, 8, 261-283.
20. Krueger, L. E. (1973). Effect of letter-pair frequency and orientation of speed of "same"-"different" judgments by children and adults. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 2, 431-433.
21. Krueger, L. E. (1978). A theory of perceptual matching. Psychological Review, 85, 278-304.
22. Lachmann, T. (2002). Reading disability as a deficit in functional coordination. In E. Witruk, A. D. Friederici, & T. Lachmann (Eds.), Basic functions of language, reading, and reading disability (pp. 165-198). Boston: Kluwer.
23. Lachmann, T., & Geissler, H.-G. (2002). Memory search instead of template matching? Memory-guided inference in same-different performance. Acta Psychologica, 111, 283-307.
24. Lachmann, T., & Geyer, T. (2003). Letter reversals in dyslexia: Is the case really closed? A critical review and conclusions. Psychology Science, 45, 53-75.
25. Lachmann, T., & van Leeuwen, C. (2005). Individual pattern representations are context-independent, but their collective representation is context-dependent. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58A, 1265-1294.
26. Pomerantz, J. R., & Pristach, E. A. (1989). Emergent features, attention, and perceptual glue in visual form perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 635-649.
27. Proctor, R. W. (1981). A unified theory for matching task phenomena. Psychological Review, 88, 291-326.
28. Proctor, R. W., & Healy, A. F. (1985). Order-relevant and order-irrelevant decision rules in multiletter matching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 519-537.
29. Proctor, R. W., & Healy, A. F. (1987). Task-specific serial position effects in comparisons of multiletter strings. Perception & Psychophysics, 42, 180-194.
30. Proctor, R. W., Healy, A. F., & Van Zandt, T. (1991). Same-different judgments of multiletter strings: Insensitivity to positional bias and spacing. Perception & Psychophysics, 49, 62-72.
31. Robbins, D. W., & Bourne, L. E. (1983). Effects of stimulus similarity on perceptual and conceptual comparisons. Perception & Psychophysics, 33, 479-486.
32. Sternberg, S. (1966). High-speed scanning in human memory. Science, 153, 652-654.
33. Stins, J. F., & van Leeuwen, C. (1993). Context influence on the perception of figures as conditional upon perceptual organization strategies. Perception & Psychophysics, 53, 34-42.
34. van der Helm, P. A. (2000). Simplicity versus likelihood in visual perception: From surprisals to precisals. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 770-800.
35. van Leeuwen, C., & van den Hof, M. (1991). What has happened to Praegnanz? Coding, stability, or resonance. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 435-448.
36. Wertheimer, M. (1923). Untersuchungen zur Lehre der Gestalt II [Investigation into Gestalt theory]. Psychologische Forschung / Psychological Research, 4, 301-351.