Individual pattern representations are context independent, but their collective representation is context dependent

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology

Volumn 58, Issue 7, 2005, Pages 1265-1294

  Lachmann, Thomas ^a,b   Van Leeuwen, Cees ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^b RIKEN BRAIN SCIENCE INSTITUTE   (Japan)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SUNDERLAND   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; REACTION TIME; REVIEW; VISION;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; REACTION TIME; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 27544442188     PISSN: 02724987     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02724980443000584     Document Type: Review

References (76)

1. Attneave, F. (1954). Some informational aspects of visual perception. Psychological Review, 61, 183-193.
2. Bell, H. H., & Handel, S. (1976). The role of pattern Goodness in the reproduction of backward masked patterns. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 139-150.
3. Berti, S., Geissler, H.-G., Lachmann, T., & Mecklinger, A. (2000). Event-related brain-potentials dissociate visual working memory processes under categorical and identical comparison conditions. Cognitive Brain Research, 9, 147-155.
4. Blackman, A. R. (1980). Relative frequency effect on choice reaction time. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 50, 767-779.
5. Brendler, K., & Lachmann, T. (2001). Letter reversals in the context of the Functional Coordination Deficit Model. In E. Sommerfeld, R. Kompass, & T. Lachmann (Eds.), Fechner Day 2001 (pp. 308-313). Berlin, Germany: Pabst.
6. Chater, N. (1996). Reconciling simplicity and likelihood principles in perceptual organization. Psychological Review, 103, 566-581.
7. Checkosky, S., & Whitlock, D. (1973). The effects of pattern Goodness on recognition time in a memory search task. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 100, 341-348.
8. Chipman, S. F., & Mendelson, M. J. (1979). Influence of six types of visual structure on complexity judgments in children and adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 365-378.
9. Clement, D. E., Guenther, Z. C., & Sistrunk, F. (1972). Uncertainty and pattern perception: Review and perspective. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicologia, 4, 177-188.
10. Clement, D. E., &Varnadoe, K. W. (1967). Pattern uncertainty and the discrimination of visual patterns. Perception & Psychophysics, 2, 427-431.
11. Corballis, M. C., & Beale, I. L. (1970). Bilateral symmetry and behavior. Psychological Review, 77, 451-464.
12. De Jong, F., & Sanders, A. F. (1986). Relative signal frequency imbalance does not affect perceptual encoding in choice reactions. Acta Psychologica, 62, 211-223.
13. Egeth, H. (1966). Parallel versus serial processing in multidimensional stimulus discrimination. Perception & Psychophysics, 1, 245-252.
14. Enns, J. T. (1987). A developmental look at pattern symmetry in perception and memory. Developmental Psychology, 23, 839-850.
15. Eriksen, C. W., O'Hara, W. P., & Eriksen, B. A. (1982). Response competition effects in "same-different" judgments. Perception & Psychophysics, 32, 261-270.
16. Farell, B. (1985). "Same-different"-judgments: A review of current controversies in perceptual comparisons. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 419-456.
17. Friederici, A. D., & Lachmann, T. (2002). From language to reading and reading disability: Cognitive functions and their neural basis. In E. Witruk, A. D. Friederici, & T. Lachmann (Eds.), Basic functions of language, reading, and reading disability (pp. 9-21). Boston: Kluwer.
18. Garner, W. R. (1962). Uncertainty and structure as psychological concepts. New York: Wiley.
19. Garner, W. R. (1966). To perceive is to know. American Psychologist, 21, 11-19.
20. Garner, W. R., & Clement, D. E. (1963). Goodness of pattern and pattern uncertainty. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 2, 446-452.
21. Garner, W. R., & Sutliff, D. (1974). The effect of Goodness on encoding time in visual pattern discrimination. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 426-430.
22. Geissler, H.-G. (2001). Is there a psychophysics of task-related structural representations? In E. Sommerfeld, R. Kompass, & T. Lachmann (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Society for Psychophysics (pp. 2-17). Leipzig: International Society for Psychophysics.
23. Geissler, H.-G. (2004). Functional architectures in structural recognition and the role of "seeming redundancy". In C. Kaernbach, E. Schröger, & H. Müller (Eds.), Psychophysics beyond sensation (pp. 157-196). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
24. Gibson, J. J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
25. Goldstone, R. L. (2000). Unitization during category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 86-112.
26. Goldstone, R. L., & Medin, D. L. (1994). Similarity, interactive activation, and mapping: An overview. In K. J. Holyoak & J. A. Barnden (Eds.), Analogical connections. Advances in connectionist and neural computation theory, Vol. 2. (pp. 321-362). Stamford, CT: Ablex.
27. Gottschaldt, K. (1926). Über den Einfluß der Erfahrung auf die Wahrnehmung von Figuren. Teil I: Über den Einfluß gehäufter Einprägung von Figuren auf ihre Sichtbarkeit in umfassenden Konfigurationen [About the influence of experience to the perception of figures]. Psychologische Forschung / Psychological Research, 8, 261-283.
28. Gregson, R. A. (1998). Confusing rotation-like operations in space, mind and brain. British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology, 51, 135-162.
29. Herbert, A. M., & Humphrey, G. K. (1996). Bilateral symmetry detection: Testing a "callosal" hypothesis. Perception, 25, 463-480.
30. Hochberg, J., & McAlister, E. (1953). A quantitative approach to figural "Goodness". Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46, 361-364.
31. Hogeboom, M., & van Leeuwen, C. (1997). Visual search strategy and perceptual organization covary with individual preference and structural complexity. Acta Psychologica, 95, 141-164.
32. Howe, E. S. (1980). Effects of partial symmetry, exposure time, and backward masking on judged Goodness and reproduction of visual patterns. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32A, 27-55.
33. Howe, E. S., & Brandau, C. J. (1980). The temporal course of visual pattern encoding: Effects of pattern Goodness. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32A, 607-633.
34. Irwin, R. J., Hautus, M. J., & Francis, M. A. (2001). Indices of response bias in the same-different experiment. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 1091-1100.
35. Krueger, L. E. (1973). Effect of letter-pair frequency and orientation on speed of "same"-"different" judgments by children and adults. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 2, 431-433.
36. Krueger, L. E. (1978). A theory of perceptual matching. Psychological Review, 85, 278-304.
37. Krueger, L. E., & Shapiro, R. G. (1981). Intertrial effects of same-different judgments. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 241-265.
38. Kubovy, M., & Wagemans, J. (1995). Grouping by proximity and multistability in dot lattices: A quantitative Gestalt theory. Psychological Science, 6, 225-234.
39. Lachmann, T. (2000). Erkennen und Vergleiche - Vorgaenge im Gedaechtnis bei der visuellen Relationserkennung [Memory processes in recognition and comparison]. Psychologia Universalis Nr. 22. Berlin, Germany: Pabst.
40. Lachmann, T. (2002). Reading disability as a deficit in functional coordination. In E. Witruk, A. D. Friederici, & T. Lachmann (Eds.), Basic functions of language, reading, and reading disability (pp. 165-198). Boston: Kluwer.
41. Lachmann, T., & Geissler, H. G. (2002). Memory search instead of template matching? Memory-guided inference in same-different performance. Acta Psychologica, 111, 283-307.
42. Lachmann, T., & Geyer, T. (2003). Reversals in reading - Is the case really closed? A critical review and conclusions. Psychology Science, 45, 50-70.
43. Lamberts, K., Brockdorff, N., & Heit, E. (2002). Perceptual processes in matching and recognition of complex pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 1176-1191.
44. Leeuwenberg, E. (1969). Quantitative specification of information in sequential patterns. Psychological Review, 76, 216-220.
45. Masame, K. (1983). Detection of symmetry in complex patterns: Is symmetrical projection to the visual system necessary for the perception of symmetry? Tohoku Psychologica Folia, 42, 27-33.
46. Miller, J. O. (1978). Multidimensional same-different judgments: Evidence against independent comparisons of dimensions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 411-422.
47. Miller, J. O., & Pachella, R. G. (1973). Locus of the stimulus probability effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 101, 227-231.
48. Millspaugh, J. R (1979). Effects of array organization on same-different judgments. Perception and Psychophysics, 23, 27-35.
49. Nickerson, R. S. (1969). "Same-different"- response times: A model and a preliminary test. Acta Psychologica, 30, 257-275.
50. Pachella, R. G., & Miller, J. O. (1976). Stimulus probability and same-different classification. Perception and Psychophysics, 19, 29-34.
51. Palmer, S. E. (1985). The role of symmetry in shape perception. Acta Psychologica, 59, 67-90.
52. Palmer, S. E. (1994). Goodness, Gestalt, groups, and Garner: Local symmetry subgroups as a theory of figural Goodness. In G. R. Lockhead & J. R. Pomerantz (Eds.), The perception of structure (pp. 23-39). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
53. Palmer, S. E., & Hemenway, K. (1978). Orientation and symmetry: Effects of multiple, near, and rotational symmetries. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 691-702.
54. Pashler, H. (1990). Coordinate frame for symmetry detection an object recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 150-163.
55. Pomerantz, J. R. (1977). Pattern Goodness and speed of encoding. Memory and Cognition, 5, 235-241.
56. Pomerantz, J. R., & Pristach, E. A. (1989). Emergent features, attention, and perceptual glue in visual form perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 635-649.
57. Proctor, R. W. (1981). A unified theory for matching task phenomena. Psychological Review, 88, 291-326.
58. Proctor, R. W. (1986). Response bias, criteria settings, and the fast-same phenomenon: A reply to Ratcliff. Psychological Review, 93, 473-477.
59. Rock, I., & Leaman, R. (1997). Symmetry. In I. Rock (Ed.), Indirect perception (pp. 151-162). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
60. Schmidt, K.-D., & Ackermann, B. (1990). The structure of internal representations and reaction-time related matching task phenomena. In H.-G. Geissler (Ed.), Psychophysical explorations of mental structures (pp. 278-289). Toronto, Canada: Hogrefe.
61. Schyns, P. G., Goldstone, R. L., & Thibaut, J. P. (1998). The development of features in object concepts. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 1-17.
62. Sebrechts, M. M., & Garner, W. R. (1981). Stimulus-specific processing consequences of pattern Goodness. Memory and Cognition, 9, 41-49.
63. Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Tech., 27, 379-423, 623-656.
64. Shepard, R. N., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171, 701-703.
65. Smothergill, D. W., & Kraut, A. G. (1981). Stimulus repetition and encoding facilitation: Locus of the effect. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 35, 52-57.
66. Sternberg, S. (1966). High-speed scanning in human memory. Science, 153, 652-654.
67. van der Helm, P. A., & Leeuwenberg, E. L. (1991). Accessibility: A criterion for regularity and hierarchy in visual pattern codes. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 35, 151-213.
68. van der Helm, P. A., & Leeuwenberg, E. L. J. (1996). Goodness of visual regularities: A nontransformational approach. Psychological Review, 103, 429-456.
69. van der Helm, P. A., & Leeuwenberg, E. L. J. (2004). Holographic goodness is not that bad: Reply to Olivers, Chater, and Watson. Psychological Review, 111, 261-273.
70. van Leeuwen, C., Buffart, H., &Van der Vegt, J. (1988). Sequence influence on the organization of meaningless serial stimuli: Economy after all. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 481-502.
71. van Leeuwen, C., & Lachmann, T. (2004). Letters and shapes have opposite congruence characteristics. Perception and Psychophysics, 6, 908-925.
72. van Lier, R., & Wagemans, J. (1997). Perceptual grouping measured by color assimilation: Regularity versus proximity. Acta Psychologica, 97, 37-70.
73. Van Zandt, T., & Townsend, J. T. (1993). Self-terminating versus exhaustive processes in rapid visual and memory search: An evaluative review. Perception and Psychophysics, 53, 563-580.
74. Van Zandt, T., Colonius, H., & Proctor, R. W. (2000). A comparison of two response time models applied to perceptual matching. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 7, 208-256.
75. Wagemans, J. (1993). Skewed symmetry: A nonaccidental property used to perceive visual forms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 364-380.
76. Wertheimer, M. (1923). Untersuchungen zur Lehre der Gestalt II [Investigation into Gestalt theory]. Psychologische Forschung / Psychological Research, 4, 301-351.