How low-income children use the internet at home

Journal of Interactive Learning Research

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 259-272

  Jackson, Linda A ^a   Von Eye, Alexander ^a   Biocca, Frank ^a   Barbatsis, Gretchen ^a   Zhao, Yong ^a   Fitzgerald, Hiram E ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 27544455112     PISSN: 1093023X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Becker, H.J. (2000). Who's wired and who's not? Children's access to and use of computer technology. The Future of Children. Children and computer technology, 10(2), 44-75. Retrieved May 8, 2005, from http:// www.futureofchildren.org
2. Cho, J., Gil de Zuniga, H., Rojas, H., & Shah, D.V. (2003). Beyond access: The digital divide and Internet uses and gratifications. IT & Society, 1(4), 46-72. Retrieved May 8, 2005 from http:// www.ItandSociety.org
3. Facer, K., & Furlong, R. (2001). Beyond the myth of the 'cyberkid': Young people at the margins of the information revolution. Journal of Youth Studies, 4, 451-469.
4. Gorski, P. (2002, Fall). Dismantling the digital divide: A multicultural education framework. Multicultural Education, 10, 28-30.
5. Jackson, L.A. (2004). Gender and computing. In W.S. Bainbridge (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human-computer interaction. Great Barrington, MA: Berkshire Publishing.
6. Jackson, L. A., von Eye, A., Biocca, F. A., Barbatsis, G., Zhao, Y., & Fitzgerald, H. E. (in press). Children's home Internet use: Predictors and psychological, social and academic consequences. Invited chapter to appear in R. Kraut, M. Brynin, & S. Kiesler (Eds.), IT at home: The social impact of domestic computing and telecommunications. London: Oxford University Press.
7. Jackson, L.A., Biocca, F., von Eye, A., Barbatsis, G., Zhao, Y., & Fitzgerald, H.E. (2004, June). Children's Internet use: Findings from the HomeNetToo project. Proceedings of ED-MEDIA, World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, Lugano, Switzerland. Norfolk, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
8. Jackson, L.A., von Eye, A., Barbatsis, G., Biocca, F., Fitzgerald, H.E., & Zhao, Y. (2004). The social impact of Internet use on the other side of the digital divide. Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery, 47(7), 43-47.
9. Jackson, L.A., vonEye, A., Biocca, F., Zhao, Y, Barbatsis, G., & Fitzgerald, H.E. (2004, November). Low-income children's career aspirations and Internet use: Findings from the HomeNetToo project. Proceedings of the International IPSI 2004 Conference, Symposium on Challenges in Internet and Interdisciplinary Research, Venice, Italy.
10. Jackson, L.A., Barbatsis, G., von Eye, A., Biocca, F.A., Zhao, Y., & Fitzgerald, H.E. (2003). Implications for the digital divide of Internet use in low-income families. IT & Society, 1(5), 219-244. Retrieved May 8, 2005 from http://www.ITandSociety.org
11. Jackson, L.A., Ervin, K.S., Gardner, P.D., & Schmitt, N. (2001). Gender and the Internet: Women communicating and men searching. Sex Roles, 44, 363-380.
12. Katz, J.E., & Rice, R.E. (2002). Social consequences of Internet use: Access, involvement, and interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13. Kraut, R., Scherlis, W., Mukopadhyay, T., Manning, J., & Kiesler, S. (1996). The HomeNet field trial of residential Internet services. Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery 39, 55-65.
14. Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukopadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American Psychologist, 53, 1017-1031.
15. Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A. (2002). Internet paradox revisited. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 49-74.
16. Nie, N.J., & Erbring, L. (2000). Internet and society: A preliminary report. Stanford Institute for the Quantitative Study of Society, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.
17. Pew Internet and American Life Project (2000a). Tracking online life: How women use the Internet to cultivate relationships with family and friends, Retrieved May 8, 2005, from http://www.pewinternet.org
18. Pew Internet and American Life Project (2000b). African Americans and the Internet. Retrieved May 8, 2005, from http://www.pewinternet.org
19. Pew Internet and American Life Project (2002). The digital disconnect: The widening gap between Internet savvy students and their schools. Retrieved May 8, 2005, from http://www.pewinternet.org
20. Rocheleau, B. (1995). Computer use by school-age children: Trends, patterns and predictors. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 1, 1-17.
21. Shields, M.K., & Behrman, R.E. (2000). Children and computer technology: Analysis and recommendations. The Future of Children, 10(2), 4-30. Retrieved May 8, 2005, from http://www.futureofchildren.org
22. Turow, J., & Nir, L. (2000). The Internet and the family 2000: The view from parents the view from kids. Philadelphia, PA: Annenberg Public Policy Center.
23. UCLA Internet Project. (2000). Surveying the digital future: Year 1. UCLA Center for Communication Policy, University of California, Los Angeles. Retrieved May 8, 2005, from http://www.ccp.ucla.edu/
24. UCLA Internet Project. (2001). Surveying the digital future: Year 2. UCLA Center for Communication Policy, University of California, Los Angeles. Retrieved May 8, 2005, from http://www.ccp.ucia.edu/
25. UCLA Internet Project. (2003). Surveying the digital future, Year 3. UCLA Center for Communication Policy, University of California, Los Angeles. Retrieved May 8, 2005, from http://www.ccp.ucla.edu/
26. U.S. Department of Commerce. 2000. Falling through the Net: Toward digital inclusion. National Telecommunications and Information Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce Digital Divide Web site. Retrieved May 8, 2005, from http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/dn/ index.html
27. Wenglinsky, H. (1998). Does it compute? The relationship between educational technology and student achievement in mathematics. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
28. Woodward, E.H. IV, & Gridina, N. (2000). Media in the home in 2000: The fifth annual survey of parents and children. Philadelphia: Annenberg Public Policy Center, University of Pennsylvania.
29. Yelland, N., & Lloyd, M. (2001). Virutal kids of the 21st century: Understanding children in schools today. Information Technology in Childhood Education Annual, (pp. 175-192).