Reproductive indicators in natural populations of Picea mexicana Martínez;Indicadores reproductivos en poblaciones naturales de Picea mexicana Martínez

Agrociencia

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 117-126

  Flores Lopéz, Celestino ^a   Lopéz Upton, Javier ^b   Vargas Hernández, J Jesús ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA AGRARIA ANTONIO NARRO   (Mexico)

^b Colegio de Postgraduados ^*  (Mexico)

Author keywords

In situ conversation; Inbreeding; Picea mexicana; Population viability; Seed production

Indexed keywords

PICEA; PICEA MEXICANA;

EID: 27444441376     PISSN: 14053195     EISSN: 14053195     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bramlett, D. L., E. W. Belcher Jr., G. L. DeBarr, J. L. Hertel, R. P. Karrfalt, C. W. Lantz, T. Miller, K. D. Ware, and H. O. III Yates. 1977. Cone analysis of southern pines: a guidebook. Gen. Tech. Rep. SE-13. USDA For. Serv., Southeastern For. Exp. Stn. Asheville, N. C. 28 p.
2. Caron, G. E., and G. R. Powell. 1989. Cone size and seed yield in young Picea mariana trees. Can. J. For. Res. 19: 351-358.
3. Farjon, A., C. N. Page, and N. Schellevis. 1993. A preliminary world list of threatened conifer taxa. Biodiversity and Conservation 2: 304-326.
4. Fowler, D. P., and Y, S. Park. 1983. Population studies of white spruce. I. Effects of self-pollination. Can. J. For. Res. 13: 1133-1138.
5. Frankham, R. 1998. Inbreeding and extinction: island populations. Conservation Biology 12 (3): 665-675.
6. Khalil, M. A. K. 1984. Genetics of cone morphology of black spruce [Picea mariana (Mill). B.S.P.] in Newfoundland, Canada. Silvae Genet. 33 (4-5): 101-109.
7. Ledig, F. T., V. Jacob C., P. D. Hodgskiss, and T. Eguiluz P. 1997. Recent evolution and divergence among populations of a rare Mexican endemic, Chihuahua spruce, following Holocene climatic warming. Evolution 51 (6): 1815-1827.
8. Ledig, F. T., B. Bermejo V., P. D. Hodgskiss, D. R. Johnson, C. Flores L., and V. Jacob C. 2000. The mating system and genetic diversity in Martinez spruce, an extremely rare endemic of México's Sierra Madre Oriental: an example of facultative selfing and survival in interglacial refugia. Can. J. For. Res. 30: 1-9.
9. Ledig, F. T., P. D. Hodgskiss, and V. Jacob-Cervantes. 2002. Genetic diversity, mating system, and conservation of a Mexican subalpine relict, Picea mexicana Martínez. Conservation Genetics 3 (2): 113-122.
10. López-Upton, J., and J. K. Donahue. 1995. Seed production of Pinus greggii Engelm. in natural stands in México. Tree Planters' Notes 46 (3): 1-10.
11. Martínez C., N. 1998. Atributos poblacionales y reproductivos de Pinus chiapensis en Chiapas México. Anales del Instituto de Biología, UNAM, Serie Botánica 69 (2): 119-134.
12. Martínez, M. 1961. Una nueva especie de Picea en México. Anales del Instituto de Biología. Tomo XXXII: 137-42.
13. Mitton, J. B. 1992. The dynamic mating systems of conifers. New Forests 6: 197-216.
14. Mosseler, A. 1992. Seed yield and quality from early cone collections of black spruce and white spruce. Seed Sci. & Technol. 20: 473-482.
15. Mosseler, A., J. E. Major, J. D. Simpson, B. Daigle, K. Lange, Y. S. Park, K. H. Johnsen, and O. P. Rajora. 2000. Indicators of population viability in red spruce, Picea rubens. I. Reproductive traits and fecundity. Can. J. Bot. 78: 928-940.
16. Owens, J. N., S. J. Simpson, and M. Molder. 1981. The pollination mechanism and the optimal time of pollination in Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii). Can. J. For. Res. 11: 36-50.
17. Park, Y. S., and D. P. Fowler. 1984. Inbreeding in black spruce (Picea mariana (Mill.) B.S.P.): self-fertility, genetic load, and performance. Can. J. For. Res. 14: 17-21.
18. Rajora, O. P., and A. Mosseler. 2001. Challenges and opportunities for conservation of forest genetics resources. Euphytica 118: 197-212.
19. Rajora, O. P., A. Mosseler, and J. E. Major 2000. Indicators of population viability in red spruce, Picea rubens. II. Genetic diversity, population structure, and mating behavior. Can. J. Bot. 78: 941-956.
20. SAS Institute Inc. 1998. SAS/STAT Guide for personal computers. Versión 8.0. SAS Institute Inc. Cary, N.C., USA.
21. Schemske, D. W. and R. Lande, 1985. The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. II. Empirical observations. Evolution 39:41-52.
22. SEMARNAT. 2002. NORMA Mexicana NOM-059-ECOL-2001, Protección ambiental-Especies nativas de México de flora y fauna silvestres-Categorías de riesgo y especificaciones para su inclusión, exclusión o cambio-Lista de especies en riesgo. In: Diario Oficial de la Federación, 6 de marzo de 2002.
23. Sorensen, F. C., and R. S. Miles. 1974. Self-pollination on Douglas-fir and Ponderosa pine seeds and seedlings. Silvae Genet. 23 (5): 135-165.
24. Sorensen, F. C., and R. K. Campbell. 1993. Seed weight-seedling size correlation in coastal Douglas-fir: genetic and environmental components. Can. J. For. Res. 23: 275-285.
25. Sorensen, F. C., and R. K. Campbell. 1997. Near neighbor pollination and plant vigor in coastal Douglas-fir. Forest Genet. 4 (3): 149-157.
26. Taylor, R. J., and T. F. Patterson. 1980. Biosystematics of Mexican spruce species and populations. Taxon 29 (4): 421-469.
27. Taylor, R. J., T. F. Patterson, and R. J. Harrod. 1994. Systematics of Mexican spruce-Revisted. Systematic Botany 19 (1): 47-59.
28. Todhunter, M. N., and R. B. Polk. 1981. Seed and cone production in a clonal orchard of jack pine (Pinus banksiana) Can. J. For. Res. 11: 512-516.
29. Yazdani, R., and D. Lindgren. 1991. The impact of self-pollination on production of sound selfed seeds. In: Biochemical markers in the population genetics of forest trees. S. Fineschi, M. E. Malvolti, F. Cannata and H. H. Hattemer (eds). SPB Academic Publishing. The Hague, The Netherlands. pp: 143-147.