Intra-operative prostate examination: Predictive value and effect on margin status

BJU International

Volumn 96, Issue 7, 2005, Pages 1005-1008

  Rapp, David E ^a,b   Orvieto, Marcelo A ^a   Lucioni, Alvaro ^a   Gong, Edward M ^a   Shalhav, Arieh L ^a   Brendler, Charles B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Examination; Prostate cancer; Surgical margin; Tactile

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CANCER STAGING; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; GLEASON SCORE; HUMAN; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PREDICTION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; REVIEW;

ADENOCARCINOMA; AGED; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; HUMANS; INTRAOPERATIVE CARE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; NEOPLASM, RESIDUAL; PALPATION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSTATE; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 27444435077     PISSN: 14644096     EISSN: 1464410X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05768.x     Document Type: Review

References (22)

1. Laven BA, Alsikafi NF, Yang XJ, Brendler CB. Minor modifications in apical dissection of radical retropubic prostatectomy in patients with clinical stage T2 prostate cancer reduce positive surgical margin incidence. Urology 2004; 63: 95-8
2. Alsikafi NF, Brendler CB. Surgical modifications of radical retropubic prostatectomy to decrease incidence of positive surgical margins. J Urol 1998; 159: 1281-5
3. Fromont G, Baumert H, Cathelineau X, Rozet F, Validire P, Vallancien G. Intraoperative frozen section analysis during nerve sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: feasibility study. J Urol 2003; 170: 1843-6
4. Cangiano TG, Litwin MS, Naitoh J, Dorey F, deKernion JB. Intraoperative frozen section monitoring or nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol 1999; 162: 655-8
5. Watson RB, Civantos F, Soloway MS. Positive surgical margins with radical prostatectomy: detailed pathological analysis and prognosis. Urology 1996; 48: 80-90
6. Blute ML, Bergstralh EJ, Iocca A, Scherer B, Zincke H. Use of Gleason score, prostate specific antigen, seminal vesicle and margin status to predict biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2001; 165: 119-25
7. Ward JF, Zincke H, Bergstralh EJ, Slezak JM, Myers RP, Blute ML. The impact of surgical margin approach (nerve bundle preservation versus wide local excision) on surgical margins and biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2004; 172: 1328-32
8. Sofer M, Hamilton-Nelson KL, Civantos F, Soloway MS. Positive surgical margins after radical retropubic prostatectomy: the influence of site and number on progression. J Urol 2002; 167: 2453-6
9. Salomon L, Levrel O, de la Taille A et al. Radical prostatectomy by the retropubic, perineal and laparoscopic approach: 12 years of experience in one center. Euro Urol 2002; 42: 104-11
10. Vaidya A, Hawke C, Tiguert R, Civantos F, Soloway M. Intraoperative T staging in radical retropubic prostatectomy: is it reliable? Urology 2001; 57: 949-54
11. Daniels GF Jr, McNeal JE, Stamey TZ. Predictive value of contralateral biopsies in unilaterally palpable prostate cancer. J Urol 1992; 147: 870-4
12. Ackerman DA, Barry JM, Wicklund RA, Olson N, Lowe BA. Analysis of risk factors associated with prostate cancer extension to the surgical margin and pelvic node metastasis at radical prostatectomy. J Urol 1993; 150: 1845-50
13. Bostwick DG, Qian J, Bergstralh E et al. Prediction of the capsular perforation and seminal vesicle invasion in prostate cancer. J Urol 1996; 155: 1361-7
14. Ravery V, Schmid HP, Toublanc M, Boccon-Gibod L. Is the percentage of cancer in biopsy cores predictive of extracapsular disease in T1-2 prostate carcinoma? Cancer 1996; 78: 1079-84
15. Weider JA, Soloway MS. Incidence, etiology, location, prevention and treatment of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Urol 1998; 160: 299-315
16. de la Taille A, Katz A, Bagiella E, Olsson CA, OToole KM, Rubin MA. Perineural invasion on prostate needle biopsy: an independent predictor of final pathologic stage. Urology 1999; 54: 1039-43
17. Sokoloff MH, Brendler CB. Indications and contraindications for nerve-sparing prostatectomy. Urol Clin North Am 2001; 28: 535-43
18. Tsuzuki T, Hernandez DJ, Aydin H, Trock B, Walsh PC, Epstein JI. Prediction of extraprostatic extension in the neurovascular bundle based on prostate needle biopsy pathology, serum prostate specific antigen and digital rectal examination. J Urol 2005; 173: 450-3
19. Walsh PC. Anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy. In Walsh PC ed, Campbell's Urology, Chapt. 90. Philadelphia: Saunders 2002: 3119
20. Ahlering TE, Woo D, Eichel L, Lee DI, Edwards R, Skarecky DW. Robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy: a comparison of one surgeon's outcomes. Urology 2004; 63: 819-22
21. Menon M, Tewari A, Baize B, Guillonneau B, Vallancien G. Prospective comparison of radical retropubic prostatectomy and robot-assisted anatomic prostatectomy: the Vattikuti Urology Institute experience. Urology 2002; 60: 864-8
22. Ahlering TE, Eichel L, Edwards RA, Lee DI, Skarecky DW. Robotic radical prostatectomy: a technique to reduce pT2 positive margins. Urology 2004; 64: 1224-8