Criticisms or plaudits for stalking laws? What psycholegal research tells us about proscribing stalking

Psychology, Public Policy, and Law

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 384-406

  Dennison, Susan M ^a   Thomson, Donald M ^b  

^a GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b CHARLES STURT UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Community perceptions; Proscribing stalking; Psycholegal research; Stalking laws; Stalking legislation

Indexed keywords

EID: 27344444538     PISSN: 10768971     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/1076-8971.11.3.384     Document Type: Review

References (73)

1. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
2. Anderson, S. C. (1993). Anti-stalking laws: Will they curb the erotomanic's obsessive pursuit? Law and Psychology Review, 17, 171-191.
3. Aronson, E. (1994). The social animal (7th ed.). New York: Freeman.
4. Australian Bureau of Statistics. (1996). Women's safety, Australia 1996. Commonwealth of Australia: Author.
5. Barnett, M. A., Quackenbush, S. W., Sinisi, C. S., Wegman, C. M., & Otney, K. L. (1992). Factors affecting reactions to a rape victim. The Journal of Psychology, 126, 609-620.
6. Bell, S. T., Kuriloff, P. J., & Lottes, I. (1994). Understanding attributions of blame in stranger rape and date rape situations: An examination of gender, race, identification, and students' social perceptions of rape victims. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 1719-1734.
7. Bernstein, S. E. (1993). Living under siege: Do stalking laws protect domestic violence victims? Cardoza Law Review, 15, 525-567.
8. Boychuk, M. K. (1994). Are stalking laws unconstitutionally vague or overbroad? Northwestern University Law Review, 88, 769-802.
9. Bridges, J. S. (1991). Perceptions of date and stranger rape: A difference in sex role expectations and rape-supportive beliefs. Sex Roles, 24, 291-307.
10. Bridges, J. S., & McGrail, C. A. (1989). Attributions of responsibility for date and stranger rape. Sex Roles, 21, 273-286.
11. Bronitt, S., & McSherry, B. (2001). Principles of criminal law. Sydney, Australia: LBC Information Services.
12. Brooks, K. A. (1993). The new stalking laws: Are they adequate to end violence? Hamline Journal of Public Law and Policy, 14, 259-299.
13. Brown, D., Farrier, D., & Weisbrot, D. (1996). Criminal laws: Materials and commentary on criminal law and process in New South Wales (2nd ed.). Sydney, Australia: Federation Press.
14. Budd, T., & Mattinson, J. (2000). The extent and nature of stalking: Findings from the 1998 British Crime Survey (Home Office Research Study No. 210). London: Home Office.
15. California Penal Code s. 646.9 (West, 1992).
16. Criminal Code [Stalking] Amendment Act 1999 [QLD].
17. Davis, K. E., & Frieze, I. H. (2000). Research on stalking: What do we know and where do we go? Violence and Victims, 15, 473-487.
18. Dennison, S. (2000). Congruence between stalking legislation and public perceptions: How accurately do stalking laws reflect public needs? Doctoral dissertation, Charles Sturt University, New South Wales, Australia.
19. Dennison, S., & Thomson, D. M. (2000). Community perceptions of stalking: What are the fundamental concerns? Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 7, 159-169.
20. Dennison, S. M., & Thomson, D. M. (2002). Identifying stalking: The relevance of intent in commonsense reasoning. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 543-561.
21. Department of Justice Victoria. (1997, April 4). Criminal justice statistics and research unit stats flash!: Stalking. Stats Flash, 9.
22. Department of Justice Victoria. (1998, February 27). Criminal justice statistics and research unit stats flash!: Stalking statistics, changes in 1996/97. Stats Flash, 29.
23. Dietz, P. E., Matthews, D. B., Martell, D. A., Stewart, T. M., Hrouda, D. R., & Warren, J. (1991). Threatening and otherwise inappropriate letters to members of the United States Congress. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 36, 1445-1468.
24. Dietz, P. E., Matthews, D. B., Van Duyne, C., Martell, D. A., Parry, C. D. H., Stewart, T., et al. (1991). Threatening and otherwise inappropriate letters to Hollywood celebrities. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 36, 185-209.
25. Evans, R. (1994, November). Every step you take: The strange and subtle crime of stalking, Law Institute Journal, 1021-1023.
26. Fahnestock, J. (1993). All stalk and no action: Pending Missouri stalking legislation. University of Missouri Kansas City Law Review, 61, 783-804.
27. Finch, E. (2001). The criminalisation of stalking: Constructing the problem and evaluating the solution. London: Cavendish Publishing.
28. Geberth, V. J. (1992, October). Stalkers. Law and Order, 138-143.
29. Goode, M. (1995). Stalking: Crime of the 90s? Criminal Law Journal, 19, 21-31.
30. Guy, R. A. (1993). The nature and constitutionality of stalking laws. Vanderbilt Law Review, 46, 991-1029.
31. Harmon, R. B., Rosner, M. A., & Owens, H. (1995). Obsessional harassment and erotomania in a criminal court population. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 40, 188-196.
32. Harris, J. (2000). An evaluation of the use and effectiveness of the Protection From Harassment Act 1997 (Home Office Research Study No. 203). London: Home Office.
33. Hills, A. M., & Taplin, J. L. (1998). Anticipated responses to stalking: Effect of threat and target-stalker relationship. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 5, 139-146.
34. Hills, A. M., & Thomson, D. M. (1999). Should victim impact influence sentences? Understanding the community's justice reasoning. Behavioural Sciences and the Law, 17, 661-671.
35. Holmes, R. M. (1993). Stalking in America: Types and methods of criminal stalkers. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 9, 317-327.
36. Kahn, A. S., & Mathie, V. A. (1994). Rape scripts and rape acknowledgement. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 53-66.
37. Koss, M. P., Goodman, L. A., Browne, A., Fitzgerald, L. F., Keita, G. P., & Russo, N. (1994). No safe haven: Male violence against women at home, at work, and in the community. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
38. Malsch, M. (2000, April 12-14). Stalking: The role of the law. Paper presented at the 10th European Conference of Psychology and Law, Limassol, Cyprus.
39. McAnaney, K. G., Curliss, L. A., & Abeytar-Price, C. E. (1993). From imprudence to crime: Anti-stalking laws, Notre Dame Law Review, 68, 819-905.
40. Meloy, J. R. (1996). Stalking (obesessional following): A review of some preliminary studies. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 1, 147-162.
41. Meloy, R. R., & Gothard, S. (1995). Demographic and clinical comparison of obsessional followers and offenders with mental disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 152, 258-263.
42. Morin, K. (1993). The phenomenon of stalking: Do existing state statutes provide adequate protection? San Diego Justice Journal, 1, 123-152.
43. Mullen, P. E., Pathe, M., & Purcell, R. (2000). Stalkers and their victims. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
44. Mullen, P. E., Pathe, M., Purcell, R., & Stuart, G. W. (1999). Study of stalkers. American Journal of Psychiatry, 156, 1244-1249.
45. O'Connell, M., & Whelan, A. (1996). Taking wrongs seriously: Public perceptions of crime seriousness. British Journal of Criminology, 36, 299-318.
46. Office of Economic and Statistical Research. (2002, March). Stalking offences. Queensland Crime Statistics Bulletin, 10.
47. Parliament of Victoria. (1994, November 16). Crimes (amendment) bill (second reading). Hansard, 16, 1884.
48. Pathe, M., & Mullen, P. E. (1997). The impact of stalkers on their victims. British Journal of Psychiatry, 170, 12-17.
49. Phillips, L., Quirk, R., Rosenfeld, B., & O'Connor, M. (2004). Am I being stalked? Perceptions of stalking among college undergraduates. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 31, 73-96.
50. Protection From Harassment Act, 1997 (England and Wales).
51. Protection From Harassment Act, 1997 (Scotland).
52. Sebba, L. (1980). Is mens rea a component of perceived offence seriousness? Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 71, 124-135.
53. Sebba, L. (1984). Crime seriousness and criminal intent. Crime and Delinquency, 30, 227-244.
54. Sheridan, L., & Davies, G. M. (2001). What is stalking: The match between legislation and public perception. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 6, 3-17.
55. Sheridan, L., Davies, G. M., & Boon, J. C. W. (2001). Stalking: Perceptions and prevalence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16, 151-167.
56. Sheridan, L., Gillet, R., & Davies, G. M. (1997). Stalking: Seeking the victim's perspective. Paper presented at the Seventh Annual Conference of the British Psychological Society, Division of Criminological and Legal Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England.
57. Sinclair, H. C., & Frieze, I. H. (2000). Initial courtship behavior and stalking: How should we draw the line? Violence and Victims, 15, 23-40.
58. Snyder, M., & Swann, W. Jr. (1978). Hypothesis-testing processes in social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1202-1212.
59. Sohn, E. F. (1994). Antistalking statutes: Do they actually protect victims? Criminal Law Bulletin, 30, 203-241.
60. South Australian Criminal Law Consolidation Act, 1935 (s19A).
61. Swanwick, R. A. (1996). Stalkees strike back - the stalkers stalked: A review of the first two years of stalking legislation in Queensland. University of Queensland Law Journal, 19, 26-44.
62. Taplin, J. L. (1997). Community perceptions of stalking behaviour. Unpublished master's dissertation. Edith Cowan University, Perth, Western Australia.
63. The Queen v. Kyriakou. (1994, May 19). Unreported, District Court Mt. Isa, Daly DCJ.
64. Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (1998). Stalking in America: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey (NCJ 169592). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
65. Tjaden, P., Thoennes, N., & Allison, C. J. (2000). Comparing stalking victimisation from legal and victim perspectives. Violence and Victims, 15, 7-22.
66. Weiner, D. (1994). Stalking: Criminal responsibility and the infliction of harm. Law Institute Journal, 18, 337-343.
67. Wells, C. (1997, July). Stalking: The criminal law response. Criminal Law Review, 463-470.
68. Westrup, D. (1998). Applying functional analysis to stalking behavior. In J. Reid Meloy (Ed.), The psychology of stalking: Clinical and forensic perspectives (pp. 275-294). San Diego: Academic Press.
69. Wilkinson, G. (1998, November 30). Stalk crime soars. Herald Sun, 1-4.
70. Wright, J. A., Burgess, A. G., Burgess, A. W., Laszlo, A. T., McCrary, G. O., & Douglas, J. E. (1996). A typology of interpersonal stalking. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 11, 487-502.
71. Wright, J. A., Burgess, A. G., Burgess, A. W., McCrary, G. O., & Douglas, J. E. (1995). Investigating stalking crimes. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health, 33, 38-43.
72. Zona, M. A., Palarea, R. E., & Lane, J. C., Jr. (1998). Psychiatric diagnosis and the offender-victim typology of stalkers. In J. Reid Meloy (Ed.), The psychology of stalking: Clinical and forensic perspectives (pp. 69-84). San Diego: Academic Press.
73. Zona, M. A., Sharma, K. K., & Lane, J. (1993). A comparative study of erotomanic and obsessional subjects in a forensic sample. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 38, 894-903.