Scoring of visual field measured through Humphrey perimetry: Principal component varimax rotation followed by validated cluster analysis

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 46, Issue 9, 2005, Pages 3169-3176

  Nordmann, Jean Philippe ^a   Mesbah, Mounir ^b   Berdeaux, Gilles ^c,d,e  

^a CENTRE HOSPITALIER NATIONAL D OPHTALMOLOGIE DES QUINZE VINGTS   (France)

^b SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^c University of Paris Cité   (France)

^d Alcon France   (France)

^e NONE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AGING; ALGORITHM; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANATOMY; ARTICLE; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; HUMPHREY PERIMETRY; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PATIENT CODING; PERIMETRY; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; SCORING SYSTEM; SCOTOMA; VALIDATION PROCESS; VARIMAX ROTATION; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT; VISUAL SYSTEM; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; FEMALE; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PILOT STUDY; VALIDATION STUDY; VISUAL DISORDER;

CLUSTER ANALYSIS; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERIMETRY; PILOT PROJECTS; VISION DISORDERS; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 27244449650     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.04-1214     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Grodum K, Heijl A, Bengtsson B. A comparison of glaucoma patients Identified through mass screening and in routine clinical practice. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2002;80:627-631.
2. Katz J, Tielsch JM, Quigley HA, Javitt J, Witt K, Sommer A. Automated supra-threshold screening for glaucoma: the Baltimore Eye Survey. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993;34:3271-3277.
3. Iwasaki A, Sugita M, Tatemichi M. Performance of glaucoma mass screening with only a visual field test using frequency doubling technology perimetty. Am J Ophthalmology. 2002;134:529-537.
4. Quigley HA. Current and future approaches to glaucoma screening. J Glaucoma. 1998;7:210-220.
5. Anderson DR, Patella VM. Automated Static Perimetry. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 1999.
6. Brigatti L, Hoffman D, Caprioli J. Neural networks to identify glaucoma with structural and functional measurements. Am J Ophthalmol. 1996;121:511-521.
7. Brigatti L, Noun Mahdavi K, Weitzman M, Caprioli J. Automatic detection of glaucomatous visual field progression with neural networks. Arch Ophthalmol. 1997;115:725-728.
8. Mandava S, Zulauf M, Zeyen T, Caprioli J. An evaluation of clusters in the glaucomatous visual field. Am J Ophthalmol. 1993;116:684-691.
9. Nunnaly J. Psychometric Theory. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1978.
10. Hamon A, Mesbah M. Questionnaire reliability under the Rasch model. Statistical Methods for Quality of Life Studies. Amsterdam: Kluwer, 2002:155-168.
11. Curt F, Mesbah M, Lellouch J, Dellatolas G. Handedness scale: how many and which items? Laterality. 1997;2:137-154.
12. Chassany O, Sagnier P, Marquis P, Fullerton S, Aaronson N. for the European Regulatory issues on quality of life assessment group. Patient-reported outcomes: the example of health-related quality of life-a European guidance document for the improved integration of health-related quality of life assessment in the drug regulatory process. Drug Inform J. 2002;36:209-238.
13. Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951;16:297-334.
14. The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study Investigators. Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study. 2. Visual field test scoring and reliability. Ophthalmology. 1994;101:1445-1455.
15. Kristof W. The statistical theory of stepped-up reliability coefficients when a test has been divided into several equivalent parts. Psychometrika. 1963;28:221-238.
16. Moret L, Mesbah M, Chwalow J, Lellouch J. Validation interne d'une échelle de mesure: relation entre analyse en composantes principales, coefficient alpha de Cronbach et coefficient de corrélation intra-classe. [Internal validation of a measurement scale: relation between principal component analysis, Cronbach's alpha coefficient and intra-class correlation coefficient]. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 1993;41:179-186.