Global versus local adaptation in fly motion-sensitive neurons

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 272, Issue 1578, 2005, Pages 2243-2249

  Neri, Peter ^a   Laughlin, Simon B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Directional gain; Insect; Neural coding; Vision

Indexed keywords

FLY; LOCAL ADAPTATION; VISION;

ADAPTATION; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CONTRAST; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; FLY; MOTION; NERVE CELL; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEPTIVE FIELD; SPATIAL DISCRIMINATION; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

ANIMALIA; INSECTA;

EID: 27244444108     PISSN: 09628452     EISSN: 14712970     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2005.3191     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Addams, R. 1834 An account of a peculiar optical phenomenon seen after having looked at a moving body. Lond. Edinb. Phil. Mag. J. Sci. 5, 373-374.
2. Anstis, S. M. & Reinhardt-Rutland, A. H. 1976 Interactions between motion aftereffects and induced movement. Vis. Res. 16, 1391-1394. (doi:10.1016/0042-6989(76)90157-7.)
3. Barlow, H. B. 1990 A theory about the functional role and synaptic mechanism of visual after-effects. In Vision: coding and efficiency (ed. C. Blakemore), pp. 363-375. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
4. Barlow, H. B. & Hill, R. M. 1963 Evidence for a physiological explanation of the waterfall phenomenon and figural aftereffects. Nature 100, 1345-1347.
5. Brenner, N., Bialek, W. & de Ruyter van Steveninck, R. 2000 Adaptive rescaling maximizes information transmission. Neuron 26, 695-702. (doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(00)81205-2.)
6. Carandini, M. & Ferster, D. 1997 A tonic hyperpolarization underlying contrast adaptation in cat visual cortex. Science 276, 949-952. (doi:10.1126/science.276.5314.949.)
7. Clifford, C. W. G. & Langley, K. 1996 Psychophysics of motion adaptation parallels insect electrophysiology. Curr. Biol. 6, 1340-1342. (doi:10.1016/S0960-9822(02)70721-5.)
8. Day, R. H. & Strelow, E. 1971 Reduction and disappearance of visual aftereffect of movement in the absence of patterned surround. Nature 230, 55-56. (doi:10.1038/230055a0.)
9. de Ruyter van Steveninck, R. R., Zaagman, W. H. & Masterbroek, H. A. K. 1986 Adaptation of transient responses of a movement-sensitive neuron in the visual system of the blowfly Calliphora erythrocephala. Biol. Cybern. 54, 223-236. (doi:10.1007/BF00318418.)
10. Egelhaaf, M., Kern, R., Hrapp, G. K., Kretzberg, J., Kurtz, R. & Warzecha, A.-K. 2002 Neural encoding of behaviourally relevant visual-motion information in the fly. Trends Neurosci. 25, 96-102. (doi:10.1016/S0166-2236(02) 02063-5.)
11. Fairhall, A. L., Lewen, G. D., Bialek, W. & de Ruyter van Steveninck, R. R. 2001 Efficiency and ambiguity in an adaptive neural code. Nature 412, 787-792. (doi:10.1038/35090500.)
12. Götz, K. G. & Wenking, H. 1973 Visual control of locomotion in the walking fruitfly Drosophila. J. Comp. Physiol 85, 235-266.
13. Haag, J. & Borst, A. 2004 Neural mechanism underlying complex receptive field properties of motion-sensitive interneurons. Nat. Neurosci. 7, 628-634. (doi:10.1038/nn1245.)
14. Harris, R. A., O'Carroll, D. C. & Laughlin, S. B. 2000 Contrast gain reduction in fly motion adaptation. Neuron 28, 595-606. (doi:10.1016/S0896- 6273(00)00136-7.)
15. Hausen, K. 1984 The lobula-complex of the fly: structure, function and significance in visual behaviour. In Photoreception and vision in invertebrates (ed. M. A. Ali), pp. 523-559. New York: Plenum Press.
16. Kohn, A. & Movshon, J. A. 2003 Neuronal adaptation to visual motion in area MT of the macaque. Neuron 39, 681-691. (doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00438- 0.)
17. Kohn, A. & Movshon, J. A. 2004 Adaptation changes the direction tuning of macaque MT neurons. Nat. Neurosci. 7, 764-772. (doi:10.1038/nn1267.)
18. Krapp, H. G. & Hengstenberg, R. 1996 Estimation of self-motion by optic flow processing in single visual interneurons. Nature 384, 463-466. (doi:10.1038/384463a0.)
19. Krapp, H. G. & Hengstenberg, R. 1997 A fast stimulus procedure to determine local receptive field properties of motion-sensitive visual interneurones. Vis. Res. 37, 225-234. (doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(96)00114-9.)
20. Kurtz, R., Warzecha, A. K. & Egelhaaf, M. 2001 Transfer of visual motion information via graded synapses operates linearly in the natural activity range. J. Neurosci. 21, 6957-6966.
21. Maddess, T. & Laughlin, S. B. 1985 Adaptation of the motion-sensitive neuron H1 is generated locally and governed by contrast frequency. Proc. R. Soc. B 225, 251-275.
22. Maffei, L., Fiorentini, A. & Bisti, S. 1973 Neural correlate of perceptual adaptation to gratings. Science 182, 1036-1038.
23. Mather, G., Anstis, S. & Verstraten, F. (eds) 1998 The motion aftereffect: a modern perspective. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24. Movshon, J. A. & Lennie, P. 1979 Pattern-selective adaptation in visual cortical neurones. Nature 278, 850-852. (doi:10.1038/278850a0.)
25. Murakami, I. & Shimojo, S. 1995 Modulation of motion aftereffect by surround motion and its dependence on stimulus size and eccentricity. Vis. Res. 35, 1835-1844. (doi:10.1016/0042-6989(94)00269-R.)
26. Srinivasan, M. V. & Dvorak, D. R. 1979 The waterfull illusion in an insect visual system. Vis. Res. 19, 1435-1437. (doi:10.1016/0042-6989(79)90220- 7.)
27. Srinivasan, M. V., Jin, Z. F., Stange, G. & Ibbotson, M. R. 1993 'Vector white noise': a technique for mapping the motion receptive fields of direction-selective visual neurons. Biol. Cybern. 68, 199-207. (doi:10.1007/BF00224852.)
28. Treue, S. & Martínez-Trujillo, J. C. 1999 Feature-based attention influences motion processing in macaque visual cortex. Nature 399, 575-579. (doi:10.1038/21176.)
29. Wainwright, M. J. 1999 Visual adaptation as optimal information transmission. Vis. Res. 39, 3960-3974. (doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(99)00101-7.)