Reduced intensity conditioning prior to allogeneic stem cell transplantation for patients with acute myeloblastic leukemia as a first-line treatment

Cancer

Volumn 104, Issue 9, 2005, Pages 1931-1938

  Blaise, Didier P ^a,b   Boiron, Jean Michel ^c   Faucher, Catherine ^a   Mohty, Mohamad ^a   Bay, Jacques Olivier ^d   Bardoux, Valerie Jeanne ^a   Perreau, Virginie ^c   Coso, Diane ^a   Pigneux, Arnaud ^c   Vey, Norbert ^a  

^a INSTITUT PAOLI CALMETTES   (France)

^b AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

^c HAUT LÉVÊQUE HOSPITAL   (France)

^d CENTRE JEAN PERRIN   (France)

Author keywords

Allogeneic stem cell transplant; AML; GVHD; Reduced intensity regimen

Indexed keywords

BUSULFAN; CYCLOSPORIN; CYTARABINE; FLUDARABINE; FLUDARABINE PHOSPHATE; METHOTREXATE; MYCOPHENOLIC ACID; THYMOCYTE ANTIBODY;

ACUTE MYELOBLASTIC LEUKEMIA; ADULT; ARTICLE; CANCER SURVIVAL; CHRONIC GRAFT VERSUS HOST DISEASE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMBINATION CHEMOTHERAPY; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; DISEASE COURSE; DRUG MEGADOSE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; RELAPSE; REMISSION; STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; ANTINEOPLASTIC COMBINED CHEMOTHERAPY PROTOCOLS; COMBINED MODALITY THERAPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEUKEMIA, MYELOCYTIC, ACUTE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PILOT PROJECTS; REMISSION INDUCTION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TRANSPLANTATION CONDITIONING; TRANSPLANTATION, HOMOLOGOUS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 27244434510     PISSN: 0008543X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.21418     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Zittoun R, Mandelli F, Willemze R, et al. Autologous or allogeneic bone marrow transplantation compared with intensive chemotherapy in acute myelogenous leukemia. N Engl J Med. 1995;332:217.
2. Reiffers J, Stoppa AM, Attal M, et al. Allogeneic vs autologous stem cell transplantation vs chemotherapy in patients with acute myeloid leukemia in first remission: the BGMT 87 study. Leukemia. 1996;10:1874-1882.
3. Gupta V, Lazarus HM, Keating A. Myeloablative conditioning regimens for AML allografts: 30 years later. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2003;32:969-978.
4. Feinstein LC, Sandmaier BM, Hegenbart U, et al. Non-myeloablative allografting from human leucocyte antigen-identical sibling donors for treatment of acute myeloid leukaemia in first complete remission. Br J Haematol. 2003;120: 281-288.
5. Taussig DC, Davies AJ, Cavenagh JD, et al. Durable remissions of myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia after reduced-intensity allografting. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:3060-3065.
6. Blaise D, Maraninchi D, Archimbaud E, et al. Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia in first remission: a randomized trial of a busulfan-Cytoxan versus Cytoxan-total body irradiation as preparative regimen: a report from the Group d'Etudes de la Greffe de Moelle Osseuse. Blood. 1992;79:2578-2582.
7. Blaise D, Maraninchi D, Michallet M, et al. Long term follow-up of a randomized trial comparing the combination of cyclophosphamide with total body irradiation or busulfan as conditioning regimen for patients receiving HLA-identical marrow grafts for acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission;. Blond. 2001;97:3669-3671.
8. de Lima M, Anagnostopoulos A, Munsell M, et al. Nonablative versus reduced-intensity conditioning regimens in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome: dose is relevant for long-term disease control after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2004;104:865-872.
9. Shimoni A, Yeshurun M, Hardan I, et al. Allogeneic stem-cell transplantation in patients with AML and MDS using myeloablative versus reduced-intensity doses of intravenous busulfan (Busulfex): the role of dose intensity. [abstract 1781. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2005;11(1suppl)59.
10. Cahn JY, Labopin M, Schattenberg A, et al. Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for acute leukemia in patients over the age of 40 years. Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Group for Bone Marrow Transplantation (EBMT). Leukemia. 1997;11:416-419.
11. Ferrant A, Labopin M, Frassoni F, et al. Karyotype in acute myeloblastic leukemia: prognostic significance for bone marrow transplantation in first remission: a European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation study. Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT). Blood. 1997;90:2931-2938.
12. Liso V, Iacopino P, Avvisati G, et al. Outcome of patients with acute myeloid leukemia who failed to respond to a single course of first-line induction therapy: a GIMEMA study of 218 unselected consecutive patients. Gruppo Italiano Malattie Ematologiche Maligne dell'Adulto. Leukemia. 1996;10:1443-1452.
13. Jourdan E, Reiffers J, Stoppa AM, et al. Outcome of adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia who failed to achieve complete remission after one course of induction chemotherapy: a report from the BGMT Study Group. Leuk Lymphoma. 2001;42:57-65.
14. Mohty M, Bay JO, Faucher C, et al. Graft-versus-host disease following allogeneic transplantation from HLA-identical sibling with antithymocyte globulin-based reduced-intensity preparative regimen. Blood. 2003;102:470-476.
15. Blaise D, Bay JO, Faucher C, et al. Reduced-intensity preparative regimen and allogeneic stem cell transplantation for advanced solid tumors. Blood. 2004;103:435-441.
16. Slavin S, Nagler A, Naparstek E, et al. Nonmyeloablative stem cell transplantation and cell therapy as an alternative to conventional bone marrow transplantation with lethal cytoreduction for the treatment of malignant and nonmalignant hematologic diseases. Blood. 1998;91:756-763.
17. Faucher C, Mohty M, Vey N, et al. Bone marrow as stem cell source for allogeneic HLA-identical sibling transplantation following reduced-intensity preparative regimen. Exp Hematol. 2003;31:873-880.
18. Mohty M, Faucher C, Vey N, et al. High rate of secondary viral and bacterial infections in patients undergoing allogeneic bone marrow mini-transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2000;26:251-255.
19. Storb R, Deeg H, Joachim, et al. Methotrexate and cyclosporine compared with cyclosporin alone prophylaxis of acute graft versus host disease after marrow transplantation for leukemia. N Engl J Med. 1986;314:729-735.
20. Mohty M, De Lavallade H, Faucher C, et al. Mycophenolate mofetil and cyclosporine for graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis following reduced intensity conditioning allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2004;34:527-530.
21. Przepiorka D, Weisdorf D, Martin P, et al. 1994 Consensus Conference on Acute GVHD Grading. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1995;15:825-828.
22. Sullivan KM, Agura E, Anasetti C, et al. Chronic graft-versus-host disease and other late complications of bone marrow transplantation. Semin Hematol. 1991;28:250-259.
23. Kwiatkowski F, Girard M, Hacene K, Berlie J. Sem: a suitable statistical software adapted for research in oncology. [In French.] Bull Cancer. 2000;87:715-721.
24. Gooley TA, Leisenring W, Crowley J, Storer BE. Estimation of failure probabilities in the presence of competing risks: new representations of old estimators. Stat Med. 1999;18:695-706.
25. Kaplan E, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc. 1957;53:457-481.
26. Anderson JR, Cain KC, Gelber RD. Analysis of survival by tumor response. J Clin Oncol. 1983;1:710-719.
27. Gratwohl A, Baldomero H, Passweg J, Urbano-Ispizua A. Increasing use of reduced intensity conditioning transplants: report of the 2001 EBMT activity survey. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2002;30:813-831.
28. Deeg HJ, Storer B, Slattery JT, et al. Conditioning with targeted busulfan and cyclophosphamide for hemopoietic stem cell transplantation from related and unrelated donors in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome. Blood. 2002;100: 1201-1207.
29. Shimoni A, Bielorai B, Toren A, et al. Intravenous busulfan-based conditioning prior to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: myeloablation with reduced toxicity. Exp Hematol. 2003;31:428-434.
30. Slovak ML, Kopecky KJ, Cassileth PA, et al. Karyotypic analysis predicts outcome of preremission and postremission therapy in adult acute myeloid leukemia: a Southwest Oncology Group/Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study. Blood. 2000;96:4075-4083.
31. Suciu S, Mandelli F, de Witte T, et al. Allogeneic compared with autologous stem cell transplantation in the treatment of patients younger than 46 years with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR1): an intention-to-treat analysis of the EORTC/GIMEMAAML-10 trial. Blood. 2003;102:1232-1240.
32. Schlenk RF, Benner A, Hartmann F, et al. Risk-adapted postremission therapy in acute myeloid leukemia: results of the German multicenter AML HID93 treatment trial. Leukemia. 2003;17:1521-1528.
33. Cahn JY, Labopin M, Sierra J, et al. No impact of high-dose cytarabine on the outcome of patients transplanted for acute myeloblastic leukaemia in first remission. Acute Leukaemia Working Party of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT). Br J Haematol. 2000;110: 308-314.
34. Burnett AK, Wheatley K, Goldstone AH, et al. The value of allogeneic bone marrow transplant in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia at differing risk of relapse: results of the UK MRC AML 10 trial. Br J Haematol. 2002;118:385-400.