Traditional versus non-traditional teaching: Perspectives of students in introductory statistics classes

Journal of Statistics Education

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2005, Pages

  Johnson, H Dean ^a   Dasgupta, Nairanjana ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Binary logistic regression; Cochran Armitrage trend test; Pedagogical research

Indexed keywords

EID: 27244434159     PISSN: 10691898     EISSN: 10691898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10691898.2005.11910558     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Agresti, A. (1990), Categorical Data Analysis, New York: John Wiley.
2. Armitage, P. (1955), "Tests for linear trends in proportions and frequencies," Biometrics, 11, 375-86.
3. Cochran, W. G. (1954), "Some methods for strengthening the common tests," Biometrics, 10, 417-51.
4. Davidson, G. V., (1990), "Matching Learning Styles with Teaching Styles: Is it a useful Concept in Education?" Performance and Instruction, 29(4) 36-38.
5. Davidson, N., and Kroll, D. L. (1991), "An Overview of Research on Cooperative Learning Related to Mathematics," Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 22(5), 362-65.
6. Giraud, G. (1997), "Cooperative Learning and Statistics Instruction," Journal of Statistics Education [Online], 5(3). www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v5n3/giraud.html
7. Henak, R. M., (1992), "Effective Teaching: Addressing Learning Styles," Technology Teacher, 52 (2) 23-28.
8. Hinde, R. J. and Kovac, J. (2001), "Student Active Learning Methods in Physical Chemistry," Journal of Chemical Education, 78(1), 93-99.
9. Hosmer, D. W., and Lemeshow, S. (2000), Applied Logistic Regression, 2nd Ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
10. Jeffries, P. R. (2001), "Computer versus Lecture: A Comparison of Two Methods of Teaching Oral Medication Administration in a Nursing Skills Laboratory," Journal of Nursing Education, 40(7), 323-29.
11. Johnson, R. T., and Johnson, D. W. (1985), "Student-Student Interaction: Ignored but Powerful," Journal of Teacher Education, 34(36), 22-26.
12. Johnson, R. T., and Johnson, D. W. (1986a), "Action Research: Cooperative Learning in the Science Classroom," Science and Children, 24(2), 31-32.
13. Johnson, R. T., and Johnson, D. W. (1986b), Encouraging Student/Student Interaction. Research Matters... to the Science Teacher, ERIC Document ED266960, United States: National Association for Research in Science Teaching.
14. Keeler, C. M., and Steinhorst, R. K. (1995), "Using Small Groups to Promote Active Learning in the Introductory Statistics Course: A Report from the Field," Journal of Statistics Education [Online], 3(2) www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v3n2/keeler.html
15. McCarthy, J. P. and Anderson, L. (2000), "Active Learning Techniques versus Traditional Teaching Styles: Two Experiments from History and Political Science," Innovative Higher Education, 24(4), 279-94.
16. McCullagh, P., and Nelder, J. A. (1989), Generalized Linear Models, 2nd Ed. London: Chapman & Hall.
17. Spoon, J. C., and Schell, J. W., (1998), "Aligning Student Learning Styles with Instructor Teaching Styles," Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 35 (2), 41-56.
18. Woo, M. A., and Kimmick, J. V. (2000), "Comparison of Internet versus Lecture Instructional Methods for Teaching Nursing Research," Journal of Professional Nursing, 16(3), 132-39.