Recruitment models for Norway spruce, Scots pine, birch and other broadleaves in young growth forests in Norway

Silva Fennica

Volumn 39, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 391-406

  Lexerød, Nils ^a   Eid, Tron ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Norway)

Author keywords

Conditional models; Growth simulators; National forest inventories; Norway; Probability models; Regeneration

Indexed keywords

ERROR ANALYSIS; GROWTH KINETICS; INVENTORY CONTROL; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; RANDOM PROCESSES;

CONDITIONAL MODELS; GROWTH STIMULATORS; NATIONAL FOREST INVENTORIES; PROBABILITY MODELS; RECRUITMENT MODELS; REGENERATION;

FORESTRY;

FOREST MANAGEMENT; MODELING; RECRUITMENT; REGENERATION;

BETULA; GROWTH; INVENTORY CONTROL; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NORWAY; PICEA; PINUS; RANDOM ERROR; RANDOM PROCESSES; RECRUITMENT;

EASTERN HEMISPHERE; EURASIA; EUROPE; NORTHERN EUROPE; NORWAY; SCANDINAVIA; WORLD;

PICEA ABIES; PINUS SYLVESTRIS;

EID: 27144559173     PISSN: 00375330     EISSN: 00375330     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14214/sf.376     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Adams, D.M. & Ek, A.R. 1974. Optimizing the management of uneven-aged forest stands. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 4(3): 274-287.
2. Agresti, A. 1996. An introduction to categorical data analysis. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York. 290 p.
3. Andreassen, K. & Tomter, S. 2003. Basal area growth models for individual trees of Norway spruce, Scots pine, birch and other broadleaves in Norway. Forest Ecology and Management 180: 11-24.
4. Belsley, D.A., Kuh, E. & Welsch, R.E. 1980. Regression diagnostics: identifying influential data and sources of collinearity. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
5. Buongiorno, J. & Michie, B.R. 1980. A matrix model of uneven-aged forest management. Forest Science 26(4): 609-625.
6. Eid, T. 2000. Use of uncertain inventory data in forestry scenario models and consequential incorrect harvest decisions. Silva Fennica 34(2): 89-100.
7. _ & Hobbelstad, K. 2000. AVVIRK-2000 - a large scale scenario model for long-term investment, income and harvest analyses. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 15: 472-482.
8. _ & Tuhus, E. 2001. Models for individual tree mortality in Norway. Forest Ecology and Management 154: 69-84.
9. _ & Øyen, B.-H. 2003. Models for prediction of mortality in even-aged forests. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 18(1): 64-77.
10. Fremstad, E. 1997. Vegetasjonstyper i Norge. NINA temahefte 12: 1-297. (In Norwegian).
11. Gobakken, T., Lexerød, N. & Eid, T. 2005. A growth simulator based on models for individual trees. In: Forest Inventory and Planning in Nordic Countries. Proceedings of SNS Meeting at Sjusjøen, Norway, September 6-8, 2004. Ed. Hobbelstad, K. NIJOS rapport 9/2005: 243-248.
12. Hoen, H.F. & Eid, T. 1990. A model for analysis of treatment strategies for a forest applying standvice simulations and linear programming. Rep. Norw. For. Res. Inst. 9/90: 1-35. (In Norwegian with English summary).
13. _, Eid, T., Veisten, K. & Økseter, P. 1998. Økonomiske konsekvenser av tiltak for et bærekraftig skogbruk. Forutsetninger og metodebeskrivelse. Rapport fra skogforskningen - Supplement 6/98: 1-48. (In Norwegian).
14. Hosmer, D.W. & Lemeshow, S. 1989. Applied logistic regression. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York. 307 p.
15. Huang, S., Yang, Y. & Wang, Y. 2003. A critical look at procedures for validating growth and yield models. In: Amaro, A., Reed, D. & Soares, P. (eds.). Modelling forest systems. CABI publishing, UK, London, p. 271-294.
16. Hyink, D.M. & Moser, J.W. 1983. A generalized framework for projecting forest yield and stand structure using diameter distributions. Forest Science 29(1): 85-95.
17. Kangas, A. 1996. On the bias and variance in tree volume predictions due to model and measurement errors. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 11(3): 281-290.
18. _ & Kangas, J. 1999. Optimization bias in forest management planning solutions due to errors in forest variables. Silva Fennica 33(4): 303-315.
19. Kozak, A. & Kozak, R. 2003. Does cross validation provide additional information in the evaluation of regression models? Canadian Journal of Forest Research 33(6): 976-987.
20. Leak, W.B. & Graber, R.E. 1976. Seedling input, death, and growth in uneven-aged northern hardwoods. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 6: 368-374.
21. Leskinen, P. & Kangas, J. 1998. Modeling and simulation of timber prices for forest management planning calculations. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 13(4): 469-476.
22. Lexerød, N. 2005. Recruitment models for different tree species in Norway. Forest Ecology and Management 206: 91-108.
23. Miller, D.M. 1984. Reducing transformation bias in curve fitting. The American Statistician 38(2): 124-126.
24. Montgomery, D.C. & Peck, E.A. 1992. Introduction to linear regression analysis. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York. 527 p.
25. Moser, J.W. 1972. Dynamics of uneven-aged forest stands. Forest Science 18(3): 184-191.
26. NIJOS 2000. Skog 2000, Statistics of forest conditions and resources in Norway. Norwegian Institute of Land Inventory, Ås. 7/99. 84 p.
27. Pasanen, K. 1998. Integrating variation in tree growth into forest planning. Silva Fennica 32(1): 11-25.
28. Randall, B.L., Ek, A.R., Hahn, J.T. & Buchman, R.G. 1988. STEMS model projection capability with incomplete tree list input data. Northern Journal of Applied Forestry 5: 190-194.
29. SAS Institute Inc. 1999. SAS OnlineDOC (R), Version 8. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC. 956 p.
30. Shifley, S.R., Ek, A.R. & Burk, T.E. 1993. A generalized methodology for estimating forest ingrowth at multiple threshold diameters. Forest Science 39(4): 776-798.
31. Sterba, H., Golser, M., Schweiger, J. & Hasenauer, H. 1997. Modelling recruitment and growth of natural regeneration. Centralblatt für das gesamte Forstwesen 114(1): 11-33.
32. Strand, L. 1967. Høydekurver for bjørk. In: Braastad, H. (ed.). Produksjonstabeller for bjørk. Meddelelse fra Del norske Skogforsøksvesen 22. p. 291-296. (In Norwegian).
33. Ståhl, G. 1994. Optimal stand level forest inventories under deterministic and stochastic stumpage value assumptions. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 9: 405-412.
34. Tveite, B. 1976. Bonitetskurver for furu. Norsk institutt for skogforskning. Intern rapport. (In Norwegian).
35. _ 1977. Bonitetskurver for gran. Meddelelser fra Norsk institutt for skogforskning 33: 1-84 (In Norwegian).
36. Vanclay, J.K. 1989. A growth model for north Queensland rainforests. Forest Ecology and Management 27: 245-271.
37. _ 1992. Modelling regeneration and recruitment in tropical rainforest. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 22(9): 1235-1248.
38. _ & Skovsgaard, J.P. 1997. Evaluating forest growth models. Ecological Modelling 98: 1-12.
39. Wikberg, P.-E. 2004. Occurence, morphology and growth of understory saplings in Swedish forests. Doctoral thesis. Department of Silviculture. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå.
40. Yaussy, D.A., Sutherland, E.K. & Hale, B.J. 1996. Rule-based, individual-tree regeneration model for forest simulators. In: Skovsgaard, J.R & Johanssen, V.K. (eds.). Modelling regeneration success and early growth of forest stands. Proceedings from the IUFRO Conference, Copenhagen, 10-13 June. Danish Forest and Landscape Research Institute. p. 176-182.