Compromise plans with clear two-factor interactions

Statistica Sinica

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 709-715

  Ke, Weiming ^a,d   Tang, Boxin ^a,b   Wu, Huaiqing ^c,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS   (United States)

^b SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d University of Memphis   (United States)

^e Department of Statistics Center for Statistics and Applications in Forensic Evidence Iowa State University 2438 Osborn Dr Ames   (United States)

Author keywords

Alias set; Clear compromise plan; Defining contrast subgroup; Fractional factorial design; Requirement set; Resolution

Indexed keywords

EID: 27144540963     PISSN: 10170405     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Addelman, S. (1962). Symmetrical and asymmetrical fractional factorial plans. Technometrics 4, 47-58.
2. k-p fractional factorial designs. Technometrics 3, 311-351 and 449-458.
3. n-m designs with resolution III or IV containing clear two-factor interactions. J. Statist. Plann. Inference 75, 147-158.
4. Chen, J., Sun, D. X. and Wu, C. F. J. (1993). A catalogue of two-level and three-level fractional factorial designs with small runs. Internat. Statist. Rev. 61, 131-145.
5. Draper, N. R. and Lin, D. K. J. (1990). Capacity considerations for two-level fractional factorial designs. J. Statist. Plann. Inference 24, 25-35.
6. Sun, D. X. (1993). Estimation capacity and related topics in experimental designs. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Waterloo, Waterloo.
7. m-p designs of resolution III and IV. Canad. J. Statist. 30, 127-136.
8. Wu, C. F. J. and Chen, Y. (1992). A graph-aided method for planning two-level experiments when certain interactions are important. Technometrics 34, 162-175.
9. Wu, C. F. J. and Hamada, M. (2000). Experiments: Planning, Analysis, and Parameter Design Optimization. Wiley, New York.
10. Wu, H. and Wu, C. F. J. (2002). Clear two-factor interactions and minimum aberration. Ann. Statist. 30, 1496-1511.