Optimal spin-entangled electron-hole pair pump

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 94, Issue 18, 2005, Pages

  Beenakker, C W J ^a   Titov, M ^b   Trauzettel, B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITEIT LEIDEN   (Netherlands)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUT FÜR PHYSIK KOMPLEXER SYSTEME   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ELECTRON-HOLE; FLYING QUBITS; NONPERTURBATIVE THEORY; SPIN-ENTANGLED;

ELECTRONS; FERMI LEVEL; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; OSCILLATIONS;

PERTURBATION TECHNIQUES;

EID: 27144516789     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: 10797114     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.186804     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. M. Switkes, C.M. Marcus, K. Campman, and A.C. Gossard, Science SCIEAS 0036-8075 283, 1905 (1999); 10.1126/science.283.5409.1905
2. T.A. Shutenko, I.L. Aleiner, and B.L. Altshuler, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 61, 10366 (2000). 10.1103/PhysRevB.61.10366
3. Y. Levinson, O. Entin-Wohlman, and P. Wölfle, Physica (Amsterdam) 302A, 335 (2001). PHYADX 0378-4371 10.1016/S0378-4371(01)00451-4
4. J.E. Avron, A. Elgart, G.M. Graf, and L. Sadun, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 236601 (2001). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.236601
5. Y. Makhlin and A.D. Mirlin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 276803 (2001). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.276803
6. C.W.J. Beenakker, C. Emary, M. Kindermann, and J.L. van Velsen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 147901 (2003). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.147901
7. P. Samuelsson, E.V. Sukhorukov, and M. Büttiker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 026805 (2004). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.026805
8. P. Samuelsson and M. Büttiker, cond-mat/0410581 [Phys. Rev. B (to be published)].
9. A. Bertoni, P. Bordone, R. Brunetti, C. Jacoboni, and S. Reggiani, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5912 (2000). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.5912
10. R. Ionicioiu, G. Amaratunga, and F. Udrea, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A IMPAEF 0217-751X 15, 125 (2001).
11. T.M. Stace, C.H.W. Barnes, and G.J. Milburn, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 126804 (2004). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.126804
12. C.W.J. Beenakker, D.P. DiVincenzo, C. Emary, and M. Kindermann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 020501 (2004). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.020501
13. M.G. Vavilov, V. Ambegaokar, and I.L. Aleiner, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 63, 195313 (2001). 10.1103/PhysRevB.63.195313
14. M. Moskalets and M. Büttiker, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 66, 205320 (2002). 10.1103/PhysRevB.66.205320
15. W.K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2245 (1998). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.2245
16. A. Botero and B. Reznik, Phys. Lett. A 331, 39 (2004). We cannot use these general results for our purpose, because the entanglement of modes does not account for the restriction on the accessible entanglement posed by charge conservation, cf. PYLAAG 0375-9601 10.1016/j.physleta.2004.08.037
17. H.M. Wiseman and J.A. Vaccaro, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 097902 (2003). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.097902
18. J. Eisert, S. Scheel, and M.B. Plenio, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 137903 (2002). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.137903
19. C.W.J. Beenakker, M. Titov, and B. Trauzettel, cond-mat/0502055.
20. A. Andreev and A. Kamenev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1294 (2000). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.1294
21. M.L. Polianski, M.G. Vavilov, and P.W. Brouwer, Phys. Rev. B PRBMDO 0163-1829 65, 245314 (2002). 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.245314