Close encounters with a fish screen: Integrating physiological and behavioral results to protect endangered species in exploited ecosystems

Transactions of the American Fisheries Society

Volumn 134, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 1111-1123

  Swanson, Christina ^a   Young, Paciencia S ^a   Cech Jr , Joseph J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESPONSE; ENDANGERED SPECIES; FISH; POPULATION DECLINE; RIVER MANAGEMENT; SPECIES CONSERVATION; SWIMMING BEHAVIOR;

CALIFORNIA; NORTH AMERICA; SACRAMENTO-SAN JOAQUIN DELTA; UNITED STATES; WESTERN HEMISPHERE; WORLD;

HYPOMESUS TRANSPACIFICUS; OSMERIDAE; PISCES;

EID: 27144506164     PISSN: 00028487     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1577/T04-121.1     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Arthur, J. F., M. D. Ball, and S. Y. Baughman. 1996. Summary of federal and state water project environmental impacts in the San Francisco Bay-Delta Estuary, California. Pages 445-495 in J. T. Hollibaugh, editor. San Francisco Bay: The Ecosystem. Pacific Division, American Association for the Advancement of Science, San Francisco, California, USA.
2. Bennett, W. A. and P. B. Moyle. 1996. Where have all the fishes gone? Interactive factors producing fish declines in the Sacramento-San Joaquin estuary. Pages 519-541 in J. T. Hollibaugh, editor. San Francisco Bay: The Ecosystem. Pacific Division, American Association for the Advancement of Science, San Francisco, California, USA.
3. CALFED. 2000. Ecosystem Restoration Program Plan. Volume 2: Ecological Management Zone Visions. CALFED Bay-Delta Program, Sacramento, California, USA.
4. CDFG (California Department of Fish and Game). 2000. Fish screen criteria. California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento, California, USA. Available at http://iep.water.ca.gov/cvffrt/DFGCriteria2.htm.
5. Clay, C. H. 1995. Design of Fishways and Other Fish Facilities. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida, USA.
6. Hadderingh, R. H., and Z. Jager. 2002. Comparison of fish impingement by a thermal power station with fish populations in the Ems estuary. Journal of Fish Biology 61(Supplement A):105-124.
7. Hayes, D. E., S. D. Mayr, M. L. Kavvas, Z. Q. Chen, E. Velagic, A. Karakas, H. Bandeh, E. C. Dogrul, J. J. Cech, Jr., C. Swanson, and P. S. Young. 2000. Fish screen velocity criteria development using a screened, circular swimming channel. Pages 137-147 in M. Odeh, editor. Advances in fish passage technology: engineering design and biological evaluation. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland.
8. Herren, J. R. and S. S. Kawasaki. 2001. Inventory of water diversions in four geographic areas in California Central Valley. California Fish and Game Fish Bulletin 179:343-355.
9. Kano, R. M. 1982. Responses of juvenile chinook salmon, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha, and American shad, Alosa sapidissima, to long term exposure to two-vector flows. Interagency Ecological Study Program for the Sacramento-San Joaquin Estuary. Technical Report 4.
10. Kimmerer, W. J., J. H. Cowan, L. W. Miller, and K. A. Rose. 2001. Analysis of estuarine striped bass population: effects of environmental conditions during early life. Estuaries 24:557-575.
11. Margraf, F. J., D. M. Chase, and K. Strawn. 1985. Intake screens for sampling fish populations: the size-selectivity problem. North America Journal of Fisheries Management 5:210-213.
12. Mount, J. F. 1995. California rivers and streams: the conflict between fluvial process and land use. University of California Press, Berkeley, California, USA.
13. Moyle, P. B. 2002. Inland Fishes of California. University of California Press, Berkeley, California, USA.
14. Moyle, P. B., B. Herbold, D. E. Stevens, and L. W. Miller. 1992. Life history and status of delta smelt in the Sacramento-San Joaquin estuary, California. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 121:67-77.
15. NMFS (National Marine Fisheries Service). 1997. Fish screening criteria for anadromous salmonids. National Marine Fisheries Service, Southwest Region, Santa Rosa, California, USA. Available at http://swr.ucsd.edu/hcd/fishscrn.htm.
16. SPSS. 2003. Sigmastat 3.0: getting started guide. SPSS, Chicago.
17. Stevens, D. E., D. W. Kohlhorst, L. W. Miller, and D. W. Kelley. 1985. The decline of striped bass in the Sacramento-San Joaquin estuary, California. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 114:12-30.
18. Swanson, C., R. Mager, S. I. Doroshov, and J. J. Cech, Jr. 1996. Use of salts, anesthetics and polymers to minimize handling and transport mortality in delta smelt. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 125:326-329.
19. Swanson, C., T. Reid, P. S. Young, and J. J. Cech, Jr. 2000. Comparative environmental tolerances of threatened delta smelt (Hypomesus transpacificus) and introduced wakasagi (H. nipponensis) in an altered California estuary. Oecologia 123:384-390.
20. Swanson, C., P. S. Young, and J. J. Cech, Jr. 1998. Swimming performance of delta smelt: maximum performance, and behavioral and kinematic limitations of swimming at submaximal velocities. Journal of Experimental Biology 201:333-345.
21. Swanson, C., P. S. Young, and J. J. Cech, Jr. 2004. Swimming in two-vector flows: performance and behavior of juvenile Chinook salmon near a simulated screened water diversion. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 133:265-278.
22. USFWS (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service). 1995a. Working paper on restoration needs: habitat restoration actions to double natural production of anadromous fish in the Central Valley of California. Volume 2. U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Anadromous Fish Restoration Program Core Group, Stockton, California, USA.
23. USFWS (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service). 1995b. Formal consultation and conference on the effects of long-term operation of the Central Valley Project and the State Water Project on the threatened delta smelt, delta smelt critical habitat, and the proposed threatened Sacramento splittail. U. S. Fish and Wildlife Services, Ecological Services, Sacramento, California, USA.
24. Wilkinson, L., G. Blank, and C. Gruber. 1996. Desktop data analysis with SYSTAT. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.