Swimming in two-vector flows: Performance and behavior of juvenile Chinook salmon near a simulated screened water diversion

Transactions of the American Fisheries Society

Volumn 133, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 265-278

  Swanson, Christina ^a   Young, Paciencia S ^a   Cech Jr , Joseph J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESPONSE; FISHPASS STRUCTURE; FLOW VELOCITY; JUVENILE; RHEOTAXIS; SALMONID; SWIMMING BEHAVIOR; WATER FLOW;

ONCORHYNCHUS TSHAWYTSCHA; SALMONIDAE;

EID: 1642354451     PISSN: 00028487     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1577/03-068     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Adams, S. R., J. J. Hoover, and K. J. Kilgore. 2000. Swimming performance of the Topeka shiner (Notropis topeka), an endangered midwestern minnow. American Midland Naturalist 144:178-186.
2. Beamish, F. W. H. 1978. Swimming capacity. Pages 101-187 in W. S. Hoar and D. J. Randall, editors. Fish Physiology, volume 7. Locomotion. Academic Press, New York.
3. Brett, J. R. 1964. The respiratory metabolism and swimming performance of young sockeye salmon. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 21: 1183-1226.
4. CALFED (CALFED Bay-Delta Program). 1999. Ecosystem restoration program plan, volume 2. Ecological management zone visions. Sacramento, California.
5. Castleberry, D. T., J. J. Cech, Jr., M. Saiki, and B. A. Martin. 1991. Growth, condition, and physiological performance of juvenile salmonids from the lower American River, February through June 1991. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and University of California. Final Report, Davis, California.
6. CDFG (California Department of Fish and Game). 2000. Fish screening criteria. Available: www.iep.water. ca.gov/cvffrt/DFGCriteria2.htm. (June 2000).
7. Clay, C. H. 1995. Design of fishways and other fish facilities. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida.
8. Hammer, C. 1995. Fatigue and exercise tests with fish. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 112A: 1-20.
9. Hanson, C. H., and H. W. Li. 1978. A research program to examine fish behavior in response to hydraulic flow fields: development of biological design criteria for proposed water diversions. Office of Water Research and Technology, U.S. Department of the Interior, Completion Report for Project C-7679, Sacramento, California.
10. Hayes, D. E., S. D. Mayr, M. L. Kavvas, Z. Q. Chen, E. Velagic, A. Karakas, H. Bandeh, E. C. Dogrul, J. J. Cech, Jr., C. Swanson, and P. S. Young. 2000. Fish screen velocity criteria development using a screened, circular swimming channel. Pages 137-147 in M. Odeh, editor. Advances in fish passage technology, American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland.
11. Healy, M. C. 1991. Life history of Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Pages 313-394 in C. Groot and L. Margolis, editors. Pacific salmon life histories. UBC Press, Vancouver, British Columbia.
12. Herren, J. R., and S. S. Kawasaki. 2001. Inventory of water diversions in four geographic areas in California's Central Valley. Pages 343-355 in R. L. Brown, editor. Contributions to the biology of Central Valley salmonids, volume 2. California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento.
13. Kano, R. M. 1982. Responses of juvenile Chinook salmon, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha, and American shad, Alosa sapidissima, to long-term exposure to twovector flows. Interagency Ecological Study Program for the Sacramento-San Joaquin Estuary, Technical Report 4, Sacramento, California.
14. Katzman, S. M. 2001. Swimming performance and muscle function in juvenile California salmon: hormonal and temperature influences during the transition from freshwater to seawater. Doctoral dissertation. University of California, Davis.
15. Kjelson, M. J., P. F. Raquel, and F. W. Fisher. 1982. Life history of fall-run juvenile Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchua tshawytscha) in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Estuary, California. Pages 393-411 in V. S. Kennedy, editor. Estuarine comparsions. Academic Press, New York.
16. Moyle, P. B. 2002. Inland fishes of California. University of California Press, Berkeley.
17. NMFS (National Marine Fisheries Service). 1997. Fish screening criteria for anadromous salmonids. NMFS Southwest Region, Sacramento, California.
18. SPSS. 1998. SYSTAT 8.0 user's manual. SPSS, Chicago.
19. Swanson, C., P. S. Young, and J. J. Cech, Jr. 1998. Swimming performance of delta smelt: maximum performance and behavioral and kinematic limitations of swimming at submaximal velocities. Journal of Experimental Biology 201:333-345.
20. USFWS (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service). 1995. Working paper on restoration needs: habitat restoration actions to double natural production of anadromous fish in the Central Valley of California, volume 2. Prepared for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services under the direction of the Anadromous Fish Restoration Program Core Group, Stockton, California.