Comparing fault-proneness estimation models

Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Engineering of Complex Computer Systems, ICECCS

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 205-214

  Bellini, P ^a   Bruno, I ^a   Nesi, P ^a   Rogai, D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORENCE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Cross validation; Empirical validation; Fault proneness estimation; Fault proneness prediction; Maintenance

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER PROGRAMMING; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE; ESTIMATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; QUALITY CONTROL; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

CROSS VALIDATION; EMPIRICAL VALIDATION; FAULT-PRONENESS ESTIMATION; FAULT-PRONENESS PREDICTION; IDENTIFYING MODELS; SOFTWARE PRODUCTS; SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT;

FAULT TOLERANT COMPUTER SYSTEMS;

EID: 27144496378     PISSN: 27708527     EISSN: 27708535     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. V. R. Basili, L. Briand, and W. L. Melo. A validation of object oriented design metrics as quality indicators. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, pp.751-761, October 1996.
2. L. C. Briand, V. R. Basili, and C. J. Hetmanski. Developing interpretable models with optimized set reduction for identifying high-risk software components. IEEE Transactions Software Engineering, vol.19, n.11, pp. 1028-1044, November 1993.
3. L. C. Briand, J. Wust, J. W. Daly, and D. V. Porter. Exploring the relationships between design measures and software quality in object oriented systems. Journal of Systems and Software, 1998.
4. G. Dunteman, Principal Component Analysis, Sage University Paper, 07-69, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 1989.
5. C. Ebert. Classification techniques for metric-based software development. Software Quality J., vol.5, no.4, pp.255-272, December 1996.
6. F. Fioravanti, P. Nesi, and S. Perlini. Assessment of system evolution through characterization. In Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering, pp.456-459, Kyoto, Japan, April 1998.
7. F. Fioravanti, P. Nesi. A Study on Fault-Proneness Detection of Object-Oriented Systems, In Proc. of the Fifth European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering, IEEE Press, pp.121-130, Lisbon, Portugal, March 2001.
8. H. F. Kaiser. The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika, vol.32, pp. 187-198, 1958.
9. R. Hochman, T. M. Khoshgoftaar. E. B. Allen, J. P. Hudepohl, S. J. Aud. Application of neural networks to software quality modeling of a very large telecommunications system. Neural Networks, IEEE Transactions on,vol.8, n.4,pp.902-909, July 1997.
10. T. M. Khoshgoftaar and E. B. Allen. Logistic regression modeling of software quality. Int. J. Reliability, Quality, and Safety Engineering., vol.6, n.4, pp.303-317, December 1999.
11. T. M. Khoshgoftaar, E. B. Allen, D. Jianyu. Using regression trees to classify fault-prone software modules. IEEE Transactions on Reliability,vol.51 ,n.4, pp.455-462,December 2002.
12. J.C. Munson, T.M. Khoshgoftaar. The Detection of Fault-prone Programs. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol.18, n.5, pp.423-432, 1992.
13. N. Ohlsson, M. Zhao, and M. Helander. Application of multivariate analysis for software fault prediction. Software Quality Journal, vol. 7, pp.51-66, 1998.
14. D. B. Simmons (editor), N. C. Ellis, H. Fujihara, W. Kuo. Software Measurement: A Visualization Toolkit For Project Control and Process Improvement Prentice Hall. November, 1997. ISBN 0-13-840695-2.
15. M. Pighin, R. Zamolo. A predictive metric based on discriminant statistical analysis. In Proc. of the 19th International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE 97. Boston, Massachusetts, USA, pp.262-270, May 1997.
16. N. F. Schneidewind. Software metrics model for integrating quality control and prediction, in Proc. 8th Int. Symp. Software Reliability Engineering, pp.402-415, 1997.
17. H. M. Sneed. Estimating the costs of software maintenance tool. In Proc. International Conference on Software Maintenance, pp.168-181, Opio, France, October 1995.