Dynamic circuitry for updating spatial representations. I. Behavioral evidence for interhemispheric transfer in the split-brain macaque

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 94, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 3228-3248

  Berman, Rebecca A ^a,d   Heiser, Laura M ^a,e   Saunders, Richard C ^b   Colby, Carol L ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH   (United States)

^c CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE   (United States)

^e LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BRAIN CORTEX; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; INTERHEMISPHERIC TRANSFER; MALE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RHESUS MONKEY; SPATIAL DISCRIMINATION; SPLIT BRAIN; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL SYSTEM;

NASA DISCIPLINE NEUROSCIENCE; NON-NASA CENTER;

ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; MACACA MULATTA; NERVE NET; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PROSENCEPHALON; SACCADES; SPACE PERCEPTION; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL FIELDS; VISUAL PATHWAYS;

EID: 27144472274     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00028.2005     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Baizer JS and Bender DB. Comparison of saccadic eye movements in humans and macaques to single-step and double-step target movements. Vision Res 29: 485-495, 1989.
2. Barash S, Bracewell RM, Fogassi L, Gnadt JW, and Andersen RA. Saccade-related activity in the lateral intraparietal area. II. Spatial properties. J Neurophysiol 66: 1109-1124, 1991.
3. Becker W and Jürgens R. An analysis of the saccadic system by means of double step stimuli. Vision Res 19: 967-983, 1979.
4. Bell AH, Everting S, and Munoz DP. Influence of stimulus eccentricity and direction on characteristics of pro- and antisaccades in non-human primates. J Neurophysiol 84: 2595-2604, 2000.
5. Bellebaum C, Daum I, Koch B, Schwarz M, and Hoffmann KP. The role of the human thalamus in processing corollary discharge. Brain 2005 [epub ahead of print].
6. Ben Hamed S, Duhamel JR, Bremmer F, and Graf W. Representation of the visual field in the lateral intraparietal area of macaque monkeys: a quantitative receptive field analysis. Exp Brain Res 140: 127-144, 2001.
7. Berlucchi G and Rizzolatti G. Binocularly driven neurons in visual cortex of split-chiasm cats. Science 159: 308-310, 1968.
8. Colby CL and Goldberg ME. Space and attention in parietal cortex. Annu Rev Neurosci 22: 319-349, 1999.
9. Corballis MC. Visual integration in the split brain. Neuropsychologia 33: 937-959, 1995.
10. Dassonville P, Schlag J, and Schlag-Reg M. The use of egocentric and exocentric location cues in saccadic programming. Vision Res 35: 2191-2199, 1995.
11. Demeter S, Rosene DL, and Van Hoesen GW. Fields of origin and pathways of the interhemispheric commissures in the temporal lobe of macaques. J Comp Neurol 302: 29-53, 1990.
12. Desimone R, Moran J, Schein SJ, and Mishkin M. A role for the corpus callosum in visual area V4 of the macaque. Vis Neurosci 10: 159-171, 1993.
13. Duhamel JR, Colby CL, and Goldberg ME. The updating of the representation of visual space in parietal cortex by intended eye movements. Science 255: 90-92, 1992a.
14. Duhamel JR, Goldberg ME, Fitzgibbon EJ, Sirigu A, and Grafman J. Saccadic dysmetria in a patient with a right frontoparietal lesion. The importance of corollary discharge for accurate spatial behaviour. Brain 115: 1387-1402, 1992b.
15. Eacott MJ and Gaffan D. Interhemispheric transfer of visual learning in monkeys with intact optic chiasm. Exp Brain Res 74: 348-352, 1989.
16. Ellison A and Walsh V. Visual field asymmetries in attention and learning. Spat Vis 14: 3-9, 2000.
17. Gazzaniga MS. Perceptual and attentional processes following callosal section in humans. Neuropsychologia 25: 119-133, 1987.
18. Gazzaniga MS, Bogen JE, and Sperry RW. Some functional effects of sectioning the cerebral commissures in man. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 15: 1765-1769, 1962.
19. Gnadt JW and Andersen RA. Memory related motor planning activity in posterior parietal cortex of macaque. Exp Brain Res 70: 216-220, 1988.
20. Gnadt JW, Bracewell RM, and Andersen RA. Sensorimotor transformation during eye movements to remembered visual targets. Vision Res 31: 693-715, 1991.
21. Goldberg ME and Bruce CJ. Primate frontal eye fields. III. Maintenance of a spatially accurate saccade signal. J Neurophysiol 64: 489-508, 1990.
22. Goldberg ME, Colby CL, and Duhamel J-R. Representation of visuomotor space in the parietal lobe of the monkey. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 55: 729-739, 1990.
23. Gottlieb JP, Kusunoki M, and Goldberg ME. The representation of visual salience in monkey parietal cortex. Nature 391: 481-484, 1998.
24. Gross CG, Bender DB, and Mishkin M. Contributions of the corpus callosum and the anterior commissure to visual activation of inferior temporal neurons. Brain Res 131: 227-239, 1977.
25. Guillery RW. Branching thalamic afferents link action and perception. J Neurophysiol 90: 539-548, 2003.
26. Hallett PE and Lightstone AD. Saccadic eye movements to flashed targets. Vision Res 16: 107-114, 1976.
27. Hasegawa I, Fukushima T, Ihara T, and Miyashita Y. Callosal window between prefrontal cortices: cognitive interaction to retrieve long-term memory. Science 281: 814-818, 1998.
28. Hedreen JC and Yin TC. Homotopic and heterotopic callosal afferents of caudal inferior parietal lobule in Macaca mulatta. J Comp Neurol 197: 605-621, 1981.
29. Heide W, Blankenburg M, Zimmermann E, and Kompf D. Cortical control of double-step saccades: implications for spatial orientation. Ann Neurol 38: 739-748, 1995.
30. Hikosaka O and Wurtz RH. Visual and oculomotor functions of monkey substantia nigra pars reticulata. III. Memory-contingent visual and saccade responses. J Neurophysiol 49: 1268-1284, 1983.
31. Hines RF, Paul LK, and Brown WS. Spatial attention in agenesis of the corpus callosum: shifting attention between visual fields. Neuropsychologia 40: 1804-1814, 2002.
32. Holtzman JD. Interactions between cortical and subcortical visual areas: evidence from human commissurotomy patients. Vision Res 24: 801-813, 1984.
33. Holtzman JD, Sidtis JJ, Volpe BT, and Gazzaniga MS. Dissociation of spatial information for stimulus localization and the control of attention. Brain 104: 861-872, 1981.
34. Houzel JC, Carvalho ML, and Lent R. Interhemispheric connections between primary visual areas: beyond the midline rule. Braz J Med Biol Res 35: 1441-1453, 2002.
35. Huxlin KR and Pasternak K. Training-induced recovery of visual motion perception after extrastriate cortical damage in the adult cat. Cereb Cortex 14: 81-90, 2004.
36. Jeffries SM, Kusunoki M, Krishna SB, Cohen IS, and Goldberg ME. Localization errors in a double-step saccade task are qualitatively explained by peri-saccade response patterns in LIP. Soc Neurosci Abstr 386.13, 2003.
37. Jouandet ML and Gazzaniga MS. Cortical field of origin of the anterior commissure of the rhesus monkey. Exp Neurol 66: 381-397, 1979.
38. Judge SJ, Richmond BJ, and Chu FC. Implantation of magnetic search coils for measurement of eye position: an improved method. Vision Res 20: 535-538, 1980.
39. Kalesnykas RP and Hallett PE. Retinal eccentricity and the latency of eye saccades. Vision Res 34: 517-531, 1994.
40. Karni A and Sagi D. Where practice makes perfect in texture discrimination: evidence for primary visual cortex plasticity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88: 4966-4970, 1991.
41. Lamantia AS and Rakic P. Cytological and quantitative characteristics of four cerebral commissures in the rhesus monkey. J Comp Neurol 291: 520-537, 1990.
42. Land EH, Hubel DH, Livingstone MS, Perry SH, and Burns MM. Colour-generating interactions across the corpus callosum. Nature 303: 616-618, 1983.
43. Li CS and Andersen RA. Inactivation of macaque lateral intraparietal area delays initiation of the second saccade predominantly from contralesional eye positions in a double-saccade task. Exp Brain Res 137: 45-57, 2001.
44. Maunsell JH and Van Essen DC. Topographic organization of the middle temporal visual area in the macaque monkey: representational biases and the relationship to callosal connections and myeloarchitectonic boundaries. J Comp Neurol 266: 535-555, 1987.
45. Mays LE and Sparks DL. Dissociation of visual and saccade-related responses in superior colliculus neurons. J Neurophysiol 43: 207-232, 1980.
46. Medendorp WP, Goltz HC, Vilis T, and Crawford JD. Gaze-centered updating of visual space in human parietal cortex. J Neurosci 23: 6209-6214, 2003.
47. Merriam EP, Genovese CR, and Colby CL. Spatial updating in human parietal cortex. Neuron 39: 361-373, 2003.
48. Nakamura K and Colby CL. Visual, saccade-related, and cognitive activation of single neurons in monkey extrastriate area V3A. J Neurophysiol 84: 677-692, 2000.
49. Nakamura K and Colby CL. Updating of the visual representation in monkey striate and extrastriate cortex during saccades. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 4026-4031, 2002.
50. Pandya DN and Vignolo LA. Interhemispheric projections of the parietal lobe in the rhesus monkey. Brain Res 15: 49-65, 1969.
51. Pierrot-Deseilligny C, Milea D, and Muri RM. Eye movement control by the cerebral cortex. Curr Opin Neurol 17: 17-25, 2004.
52. Pisella L and Mattingley JB. The contribution of spatial remapping impairments to unilateral visual neglect. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 28: 181-200, 2004.
53. Platt ML and Glincher PW. Response fields of intraparietal neurons quantified with multiple saccadic targets. Exp Brain Res 121: 65-75, 1998.
54. Previc FH. Functional specialization in the lower and upper visual fields in humans: its ecological origins and neurophysiological implications. Behav Brain Sci 13: 519-575, 1990.
55. Quaia C, Optican LM, and Goldberg ME. The maintenance of spatial accuracy by the perisaccadic remapping of visual receptive fields. Neural Networks 11: 1229-1240, 1998.
56. Recanzone GH, Schreiner CE, and Merzenich MM. Plasticity in the frequency representation of primary auditory cortex following discrimination training in adult owl monkeys. J Neurosci 13: 87-103, 1993.
57. Reuter-Lorenz PA and Fendrich R. Orienting attention across the vertical meridian: evidence from callosotomy patients. J Cogn Neurosci 2: 232-238, 1990.
58. Rudolph K and Pasternak T. Transient and permanent deficits in motion perception after lesions of cortical areas MT and MST in the macaque monkey. Cereb Cortex 9: 90-100, 1999.
59. Schwartz ML and Goldman-Rakic PS. Callosal and intrahemispheric connectivity of the prefrontal association cortex in rhesus monkey: relation between intraparietal and principal sulcal cortex. J Comp Neurol 226: 403-420, 1984.
60. Seltzer B and Pandya DN. The distribution of posterior parietal fibers in the corpus callosum of the rhesus monkey. Exp Brain Res 49: 147-150, 1983.
61. Sommer MA and Wurtz RH. A pathway in primate brain for internal monitoring of movements. Science 296: 1480-1482, 2002.
62. Sommer MA and Wurtz RH. The frontal eye field sends predictively remapped visual signals to the colliculus. J Vision 3: 146a, 2003.
63. Sommer MA and Wurtz RH. What the brain stem tells the frontal cortex. I. Oculomotor signals sent from superior colliculus to frontal eye field via mediodorsal thalamus. J Neurophysiol 91: 1381-1402, 2004a.
64. Sommer MA and Wurtz RH. What the brain stem tells the frontal cortex. II. Role of the SC-MD-FEF pathway in corollary discharge. J Neurophysiol 91: 1403-1423, 2004b.
65. Tomita H, Ohbayashi M, Nakahara K, Hasegawa I, and Miyashita Y. Top-down signal from prefrontal cortex in executive control of memory retrieval. Nature 401:699-703, 1999.
66. Trevarthen C. Integrative functions of the cerebral commissures. In: Handbook of Neuropsychology, edited by Boller FG and Grafman J. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1990, vol. 4, p. 49-83.
67. Umeno MM and Goldberg ME. Spatial processing in the monkey frontal eye field. I. Predictive visual responses. J Neurophysiol 78: 1373-1383, 1997.
68. Umeno MM and Goldberg ME. Spatial processing in the monkey frontal eye field. II. Memory responses. J Neurophysiol 86: 2344-2352, 2001.
69. van Donkelaar P and Muri R. Craniotopic updating of visual space across saccades in the human posterior parietal cortex. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 269: 735-739, 2002.
70. Vogels R, Saunders RC, and Orban GA. Hemispheric lateralization in rhesus monkeys can be task-dependent. Neuropsychologia 32: 425-438, 1994.
71. Walker MF, Fitzgibbon EJ, and Goldberg ME. Neurons in the monkey superior colliculus predict the visual result of impending saccadic eye movements. J Neurophysiol 73: 1988-2003, 1995.
72. White RL III and Snyder LH. Delay period microstimulation in frontal eye fields updates spatial memories. Soc Neurosci Abstr 527: 9, 2004.
73. Zaidel E and Iacoboni M. Introduction: Poffenberger's simple reaction time paradigm for measuring interhemispheric transfer time. In: The Parallel Brain: The Cognitive Neuroscience of the Corpus Callosum, edited by Zaidel E and Iacoboni M. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2003, p. 1-7.
74. Zivotofsky AZ, Tzur R, Caspi A, and Gordon CR. Evidence for coprocessing of orthogonal compared to co-linear saccades. Soc Neurosci Abstr 441: 6, 2003.