Ab initio molecular dynamics of liquid 1,3-dimethylimidazolium chloride

Journal of Physical Chemistry B

Volumn 109, Issue 39, 2005, Pages 18591-18599

  Bühl, Michael ^a   Chaumont, Alain ^b   Schurhammer, Rachel ^b   Wipff, Georges ^b  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUT FÜR KOHLENFORSCHUNG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITÉ LOUIS PASTEUR   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHARGE TRANSFER; HYDROGEN BONDS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; NEUTRON DIFFRACTION; POSITIVE IONS; SALTS;

ANTIBONDING; CAR-PARRINELLO MOLECULAR DYNAMICS (CPMD); CATION-ANION DISTRIBUTION; IONIC LIQUIDS;

CHLORINE COMPOUNDS;

EID: 26944493390     PISSN: 15206106     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jp0518299     Document Type: Review

References (77)

1. For selected reviews and monographs see e.g.: (a) Welton, T. Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 2071-2083.
2. (b) Rogers, R. D.; Seddon, K. R., Eds. Ionic Liquids. Industrial applications for Green Chemistry; ACS Symp. Ser. Vol. 818; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 2002.
3. For selected reviews in organic synthesis see, e.g.: (a) Earle, M. J.; Seddon, K. R. In Clean Solvents; Abraham, M. A., Moens, L., Eds.; ACS Symp. Ser. Vol. 819; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 2002; pp 10-25.
4. (b) Baudequin, C.; Levillain, J.; Cahard, D.; Gaumont, A. C.; Plaquevent, J. C. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2003, 14, 3081-3093.
5. (c) Andrade, C. K. Z.; Alves, L. M. Curr. Org. Chem. 2005, 9, 195-218.
6. For selected reviews in catalysis see, e.g.: (a) Gordon, C. M. Appl. Catal., A 2001, 222, 101-117.
7. (b) Zhao, D. B.; Wu, M.; Kou, Y.; Min, E. Catal. Today 2002, 74, 157-189.
8. (c) Sheldon, R. A.; Lau, R. M.; Sorgedrager, M. J.; van Rantwijk, F.; Seddon, K. R. Green Chem. 2002, 4, 147-151.
9. (d) Welton, T. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2004, 248, 2459-2477.
10. (e) Wasserscheid, P.; Welton, T. Ionic Liquids in Synthesis; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2002.
11. Arduengo, A. J.; Dias, H. V. R.; Harlow, R. L.; Kline, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 5530-5534.
12. Kölle, R.; Dronskowski, R. Inorg. Chem. 2004, 43, 2803-2809.
13. Review: Dupont, J. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2004, 15, 341-350.
14. Turner, E. A.; Pye, C. C.; Singer, R. D. J. Phys. Chem. A 2003, 107, 2277-2288.
15. Talaty, E. R.; Raja, S.; Storhaug, V. J.; Dölle, A.; Carper, W. R. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 13177-13184.
16. For some recent examples see: (a) Urahata, S. M.; Ribeiro, M. C. C. J. Chem. Phys. 2005, 122, 024511.
17. (b) Del Pópolo, M. G.; Voth, G. A. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 1744-1752.
18. (c) Hanke, C. G.; Lynden-Bell, R. M. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 10873-10878.
19. (d) Margulis, C. J.; Stern, H. A.; Berne, B. J. J. Phys. Chem. B 2002, 106, 12017-12021.
20. (e) Canongia-Lopes, J. N.; Deschamps, J.; Padua, A. A. H. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 2038-2047.
21. (f) de Andrade, J.; Böes, E. S.; Stassen, H. J. Phys. Chem. B 2002, 106, 3546-3548.
22. For instance: (a) Chaumont, A.; Wipff, G. Inorg. Chem. 2004, 43, 5891-5901.
23. (b) Chaumont, A.; Wipff, G. Chem. Eur. J. 2004, 10, 3919-3930.
24. For a semiempirical (AM1) MD study see: Kunsági- Máté, S.; Lemli, B.; Nagy, G.; Kollár, L. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 9246-9250.
25. For a very recent DFT-based MD study see: Del Pópolo, M. G.; Lynden-Bell, R. M.; Kohanoff, J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 5895-5902.
26. Liu, Z.; Huang, S.; Wang, W. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 12978-12989.
27. Car, R.; Parrinello, M. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1985, 55, 2471-2474.
28. See for instance: Sprik, M. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2000, 12, A161-A163 and references therein.
29. Hardacre, C.; Holbrey, J. D.; McMath, S. E. J.; Bowron, D. T.; Soper, A. K. J. Chem. Phys. 2003, 118, 273-278.
30. Empirical potential structure refinement process: (a) Soper, A. K. Chem. Phys. 1996, 202, 295-306.
31. (b) Soper, A. K. Mol. Phys. 2001, 99, 1503-1516.
32. (a) Hehre, W. J.; Ditchfield, R.; Pople, J. A. J. Chem. Phys. 1972, 56, 2257-2261.
33. (b) Hariharan, P. C.; Pople, J. A. Theor. Chim. Acta 1973, 28, 213-222.
34. (c) Clark, T.; Chandrasekhar, J.; Spitznagel, G. W.; Schleyer, P. v. R. J. Comput. Chem. 1983, 4, 294-301.
35. Becke, A. D. Phys. Rev. A 1988, 38, 3098-3100.
36. Perdew, J. P. Phys. Rev. B 1986, 33, 8822-8824.
37. Perdew, J. P. Phys. Rev. B 1986,34, 7406.
38. Lee, C.; Yang, W.; Parr, R. G. Phys. Rev. B 1988, 37, 785-789.
39. (a) Perdew, J. P.; Burke, K.; Ernzerhof, M. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 77, 3865-3868.
40. (b) Perdew, J. P.; Burke, K.; Ernzerhof, M. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1997, 78, 1396.
41. Becke, A. D. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648-6552.
42. Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; et al. Gaussian 98; Gaussian, Inc.: Pittsburgh, PA, 1998.
43. Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; et al. Gaussian 03; Gaussian, Inc.: Pittsburgh, PA, 2003.
44. CPMD Version 3.7.0.; Copyright by IBM Corp. and Max-Planck-Institut für Festkörperforschung: Stuttgart, Germany.
45. Troullier, N.; Martins, J. L. Phys. Rev. B 1991, 43, 1993-2006.
46. Kleinman, L.; Bylander, D. M. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1982, 48, 1425-1428.
47. Reed, A. E.; Curtiss, L. A.; Weinhold, F. Chem. Rev. 1988, 88, 899-926.
48. (a) Singh, U. C.; Kollman, P. A. J. Comput. Chem. 1984, 5, 129-145.
49. (b) Besler, B. H.; Merz, K. M., Jr.; Kollman, P. A. J. Comput. Chem. 1990, 11, 431-439.
50. Breneman, C. M.; Wiberg, K. B. J. Comput. Chem. 1990, 11, 361-373.
51. Atomic orbitals were taken from the pseudo wave functions involved in construction of the pseudopotentials, except for hydrogen, where a standard Slater function was used.
52. (a) Wannier, G. H. Phys. Rev. 1937, 52, 191-197.
53. (b) Berghold, G.; Mundy, C. J.; Romero, A. H.; Hutter, J.; Parrinello, M. Phys. Rev. B 2000, 61, 10040-10048.
54. Case, D. A.; Pearlman, D. A.; Caldwell, J. W.; Cheatham, T. E., III; Wang, J.; Ross, W. S.; Simmerling, C. L.; Darden, T. A.; Merz, K. M.; Stanton, R. V.; Cheng, A. L.; Vincent, J. J.; Crowley, M.; Tsui, V.; Gohlke, H.; Radmer, R. J.; Duan, Y.; Pitera, J.; Massova, I.; Seibel, G. L.; Singh, U. C.; Weiner, P. K.; Kollman, P. A. ̧AMBER7; University of California: San Francisco, CA, 2002.
55. de Andrade, J.; Böes, E. S.; Stassen, H. J. Phys. Chem. B 2002, 106, 13344-13351.
56. Morrow, T. I.; Maginn, E. J. J. Phys. Chem. B 2002, 106, 12807-12813.
57. Hanke, C. G.; Price, S. L.; Lynden-Bell, R. M. Mol. Phys. 2001, 99, 801-809.
58. By 1.5 kcal/mol with dielectric constants of 10 and 78, as obtained from single point calculations using the Polarizable Continuum Model (Barone, V.; Cossi, M.; Tomasi, J. J. Comput. Chem. 1998, 19, 404.
59. Cossi, M.; Scalmani, G.; Rega, N.; Barone, V. J. Chem. Phys. 2002, 117, 43.
60. Cossi, M.; Crescenzi, O. J. Chem. Phys. 2003, 19, 8863) as implemented in Gaussian 03.
61. 1 = 2.20 Å) differ conspicuously from our PBE/6-31+G* * data in Table 1, which could be indicative of an overestimation of the cation-anion interaction with the former approach. Also, Del Pópolo et al. find that perpendicular π-coordinated 2 is preferred over in-plane coordinated 1 (by 3.2 kcal/mol), whereas we find the opposite result at all DFT levels including PBE (Table 1). In any event, the two forms are close in energy, and mimicking the solvent by an empirical solvation model is sufficient to enhance the preference for in-plane coordination, as found in the solid-state structure and in the liquid state.
62. Fannin, A. A., Jr.; Florcani, D. A.; King, L. A.; Landers, J. S.; Piersma, B. J.; Stech, D. J.; Vaughn, R. L.; Wilkes, J. S.; Williams, J. L. J. Phys. Chem. 1984, 88, 2614-2621.
63. For the definition of the pair correlation function see, for example: Allen, M. P.; Tildesley, D. J. Computer Simulation of Liquids; Clarendon Press: Oxford, UK, 1987.
64. The performance of AMBER to describe geometries and interaction energies of stacked N-heterocyclic aromatics (such as DNA base pairs) is usually quite good, but can depend on the particular system, see, e.g.: (a) Hobza, P.; Kabeláč, M.; Šponer, J.; Mejzlík, P.; Vondrá×f0ek, J. J. Comput. Chem. 1997, 18, 1136-1150.
65. (b) Řeha, D.; Kabeláč, M.; Ryáček, F.; Šponer, J.; Šponer, J. E.; Elstner, M.; Suhai, S.; Hobza, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 3366-3376.
66. Shim, Y.; Duan, J.; Choi, M. Y.; Kim, H. Y. J. Phys. Chem. 2003, 119, 6411-6414.
67. Yan, T.; Burnham, C. J.; Del Pópolo, M. G.; Voth, G. A. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 11877-11881
68. For recent monographs and reviews, see, e.g.: (a) Desiraju, G. R.; Steiner, T.; The Weak Hydrogen Bond in Structural Chemistry and Biology; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1999.
69. (b) Steiner, T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 48-76.
70. (c) Meot-Ner (Mautner), M. Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 213-284.
71. Wiberg, K. Tetrahedron 1968, 24, 1083-1096.
72. For instance: (a) Guerra, C. F.; Bickelhaupt, F. M.; Snijders, J. G.; Baerends, E. J. Chem. Eur. J. 1999, 5, 3581-3594.
73. (b) Bühl, M.; Wipff, G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 4473-4480.
74. (c) Kryachko, E. S.; Zeegers-Huyskens, T. J. Phys. Chem. A 2002, 106, 6832-6838.
75. Wiberg, K. B.; Rablen, P. R. J. Comput. Chem. 1993, 14, 1504-1518.
76. The significance of this bonding analysis should be unaffected by possible incomplete equilibration of the cation-cation distribution, see above.
77. Similar values for the unassigned charge were found in CPMD results for an ionic solid: Haiber, M.; Ballone, P.; Parrinello, M. Am. Mineral. 1997, 82, 913-922.