Compensation and induced defense in response to herbivory in Sedum maximum (Crassulaceae)

Fragmenta Floristica et Geobotanica

Volumn 45, Issue 1-2, 2000, Pages 193-202

  Adamski, Paweł ^a   Margielewska, Katarzyna ^a   Witkowski, Zbigniew ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF NATURE CONSERVATION   (Poland)

Author keywords

Chemical defense; Compensation response; Herbivory; Parnassius apollo; Sedum maximum; Shift of energy allocation

Indexed keywords

EID: 26944492684     PISSN: 0015931X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. AARSSEN L. W. 1995. Hypotheses for the evolution of apical dominance in plants: implications for the interpretation of overcompensation. - Oikos 74: 149-156.
2. AARSSEN L. W. & IRVIN D. L. 1991. What selection: herbivory or competition? - Oikos 60: 261-262.
3. AGRAWAL A. A. 2000. Benefits and costs of induced plant defense for Lepidium virginicum (Brassicaceae). - Ecology 81: 1804-1813.
4. BERGELSON J. & CRAWLEY M. J. 1992. Herbivory and Ipomopis aggregata: the disadvantages of being eaten. - Am. Nat. 139: 870-882.
5. BERGELSON J., JUENGER T. & CRAWLEY M. J. 1996. Regrowth following herbivory in Ipomopsis aggregata: compensation but not overcompensation. - Am. Nat. 148: 744-755.
6. FRANK B. & HARTMANN W. 1963. Sedum-Alkaloide. - Abh. Deut. Acad. Wiess. Berl., Kl. Chem. Geol., Biol. 44: 111-119.
7. HAUKIOJA E. & NEUVONEN S. 1985. Induced long-term resistance of birch foliage against defoliators: defensive or incidental? - Ecology 66: 1303-1308.
8. ŁASKAWIEC A. 1988. Rozmieszczenie i zasoby Sedum maximum Sut. w Pienińskim Parku Narodowym (Distribution and resources of Sedum maximum Sut. in the Pieniny National Park). Mscr. of M. Sc. thesis, Institute of Botany, Jagiellonian University, Kraków.
9. MASCHINSKI J. & WHITHAM T. G. 1989. The continuum of plant responses to herbivory: the influence of plant association, nutrient availability and timing. - Am. Nat. 134: 1-19.
10. MOSER H. A. & OERTLI J. J. 1980. Evidence of a biochemical interaction between insect and specific foodplant in the system P. apollo - S. album. - Rev. Suisse Zool. 87: 341-357.
11. MUTIKAINEN P. & WALLS M. 1995. Growth, reproduction and defence in nettles: responses to herbivory modified by competition and fertilization. - Oecologia 104: 487-495.
12. OHNMEISS T. E. & BALDWIN I. T. 2000. Optimal defense theory predicts the ontogeny of an induced nicotine defense. - Ecology 81: 1765-1783.
13. PAIGE K. N. & WHITHAM T. G. 1987. Overcompensation in response to mammalian herbivory: the advantages of being eaten. - Am. Nat. 129: 407-416.
14. RHOADES D. F. 1979. Evolution of plant chemical defense against herbivores. - In: G. A. ROSENTHAL & D. H. JANZEN (eds), Herbivores: their interaction with secondary plant metabolites, pp. 4-54. Academic Press, New York.
15. VERKAAR H. J. E., MEIJDEN VAN DER E. & BREEBART L. 1986. The responses of Cynoglossum officinale L. and Verbascum thapsus L. to defoliation in relation to nitrogen supply. - New. Phytol. 104: 121-129.
16. WALA K. 1995. Rozchodnik wielki Sedum maximum - roślina żywicielska ga̧sienic niepylaka apollo Parnassius apollo [Sedum maximum - the host plant of apollo butterfly caterpillars]. Chrońmy Przyr. Ojcz. 51(3): 44-55 (in Polish with English summary).
17. WITKOWSKI Z. & ADAMSKI P. 1996. Decline and rehabilitation of the apollo butterfly Parnassius apollo (Linnaeus, 1758) in the Pieniny National Park (Polish Carpathians). - In: J. SETTELE, C. MARGULES, P. POSCHLOD & K. HEINLE (eds), Species survival in fragmented landscapes, pp. 7-14. Kluwer Academic Publ., Dordrecht.
18. WITKOWSKI Z., PŁONKA P. & BUDZIK J. 1993. Vanishing of the local race of the apollo butterfly, Parnassius apollo frankenbergeri Slaby 1955 in the Pieniny Mountains (Polish West Carpathians) and measures taken to restitute its population, (in Polish). - In: A. BIDERMAN & B. WIŚNIEWSKI (eds), Utrzymanie i restytucja gina̧cych gatunków roślin i zwierza̧t w parkach narodowych i rezerwatach przyrody [Preservation and restitution of declining species in natural parks and nature reserves]. - Pra̧dnik (Suppl. 1993): 103-119.
19. WITKOWSKI Z. & ADAMSKI P. 1997. Decline and rehabilitation of apollo butterfly Parnassius apollo (Linnaeus 1758) in the Pieniny National Park (Polish Carpathians): 7-14. - In: J. SETTELE, C. MARGULES, P. POSCHLOD & K. HEINLE (eds), Species Survival in fragmented landscapes, pp. 7-14. Kluwer Academic Publ., Dordrecht.
20. WOLBIŚ M. 1989. Badania zwia̧zków fenolowych w niektórych gatunkach rodzaju Sedum L. ["Studies of phenolic compounds in some species of the genus Sedum L."]. 112 pp. Habilitation Thesis, Medical Academy of Łódź, Łódź (in Polish).
21. ZARZYCKI K. (ed.). 1991. Przyroda Pienin w obliczu zmian [The nature of the Pieniny Mts. (West Carpathians) in face of the coming changes]. 578 pp. Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Warszawa (in Polish).
22. ZAWISZA A. 1998. Pochodzenie linii hodowlanej niepylaka apollo, Parnassius apollo L. ssp. frankenbergeri Slaby (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae) a tempo metabolizmu i budzet energetyczny w końcowych etapach ontogenezy (Origin of breeding line of apollo butterfly, Parnassius apollo L., ssp. frankenbergeri Slaby (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae) and metabolism rate and energy budget in the final phase of ontogenesis). Mscr. of M. Sc. thesis, Chair of Physiology of Man and Animals, Silesian University, Katowice.