Contrast-enhanced "low MI real-time" phase-inversion sonography to differentiate between malignant and benign focal liver lesions;Kontrastmittelgestützte "low-MI-real-time"-sonographie zur beurteilung der dignität fokaler leberläsionen

RoFo Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Rontgenstrahlen und der Bildgebenden Verfahren

Volumn 177, Issue 10, 2005, Pages 1394-1404

  Strunk, Holger ^a   Borner N ^b   Stuckmann, G ^c   Frohlich E ^d   Hadizadeh, D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL BONN   (Germany)

^b Gastroenterologische Gemeinschaftspraxis Mainz ^*  (Germany)

^c Radiologische Abteilung des Kantonspitals Winterthur   (Switzerland)

^d Karl Olga Krankenhaus   (Germany)

Author keywords

Contrast media; Liver; Liver tumors; Phase inversion technique; Sonography; SonoVue

Indexed keywords

SONOVUE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; B SCAN; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; LIVER ADENOMA; LIVER CIRRHOSIS; LIVER HEMANGIOMA; LIVER METASTASIS; LIVER TUMOR; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REAL TIME ECHOGRAPHY; SARCOIDOSIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TERATOMA; TUMOR VOLUME; VIDEORECORDING;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COMPUTER SYSTEMS; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; LIVER NEOPLASMS; MALE; MICROBUBBLES; MIDDLE AGED; PHOSPHOLIPIDS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SULFUR HEXAFLUORIDE;

EID: 26944470796     PISSN: 14389029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-858319     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Albrecht T, Hoffmann CW, Schmitz SA et al. Phase-inversion sonography during the liver-specific late phase of contrast enhancement: improved detection of liver metastases. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 176: 1191-1198
2. Harvey CJ, Blomley MJ, Eckersley RJ et al. Pulse-inversion mode imaging of liver specific microbubbles: improved detection of subcentimetre metastases. Lancet 2000; 355: 807-808
3. Bernatik T, Strobel D, Hahn EG et al. Detection of liver metastases: comparison of contrast-enhanced wide-band harmonic imaging with conventional ultrasonography. J Ultrasound Med 2001; 20: 509-515
4. Oldenburg A, Albrecht T, Hohmann J et al. Detektion von Lebermetastasen mittels Kontrastmittel gestützter Sonographie mit SonoVue in "low-MI-real-time" Technik. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2004; 176: S1
5. Hohmann J, Skrok J, Puls R et al. Charakterisierung fokaler Leberläsionen mit kontrastmittelgestütztem "low MI real time" Ultraschall und SonoVue. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2003; 175: 835-843
6. Kim TK, Choi BI, Han JK et al. Hepatic tumors: contrast agent-enhancement patterns with pulse-inversion harmonic US. Radiology 2000; 216: 411-417
7. Strobel D, Hahn EG, Becker D. Harmonic Imaging zur Verbesserung der Diagnostik von Lebertumoren - ein Werkstattbericht. Z Gastroenterol 2001; 39: 287-289, 292-294
8. Strobel D, Hoefer A, Martus P et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced power Doppler sonography improves the differential diagnosis of liver lesions. Int J Colorectal Dis 2001; 16: 247-256
9. Gebel M, Caselitz M, Manns MP. Sonographische Diagnose raumfordernder Leberprozesses. Internist (Berl) 1997; 38: 901-907
10. Harvey CJ, Albrecht T. Ultrasound of focal liver lesions. Eur Radiol 2001; 11: 1578-1593
11. Nisenbaum HL, Rowling SE. Ultrasound of focal hepatic lesions. Semin Roentgenol 1995; 30: 324-346
12. Beissert M, Jenett M, Keberle M et al. Vergleich von Contrast Harmonic Imaging im B-Mode mit stimulierter akustischer Emission, konventionellem B-Mode US und Spiral-CT in der Detektion fokaler Leberläsionen. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2000; 172: 361-366
13. Dalla Palma L, Bertolotto M, Quaia E et al. Detection of liver metastases with pulse inversion harmonic imaging: preliminary results. Eur Radiol 1999; 9 (Suppl 3): S382-387
14. Quaia E, Bertolotto M, Calderan L et al. US characterization of focal hepatic lesions with intermittent high-acoustic-power mode and contrast material. Acad Radiol 2003; 10: 739-750
15. Quaia E, Degobbis F, Tona G et al. [Differential patterns of contrast enhancement in different focal liver lesions after injection of the microbubble US contrast agent SonoVue]. Radiol Med (Torino) 2004; 107: 155-165
16. Strobel D, Raeker S, Martus P et al. Phase inversion harmonic imaging versus contrast-enhanced power Doppler sonography for the characterization of focal liver lesions. Int J Colorectal Dis 2003; 18: 63-72
17. Wilson SR, Burns PN, Muradali D et al. Harmonic hepatic US with microbubble contrast agent: initial experience showing improved characterization of hemangioma, hepatocellular carcinoma, and metastasis. Radiology 2000; 215: 153-161
18. Burns PN, Hope Simpson D, Averkiou MA. Nonlinear imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol 2000; 26 (Suppl 1): S19-22
19. Burns PN, Wilson SR, Simpson DH. Pulse inversion imaging of liver blood flow: improved method for characterizing focal masses with microbubble contrast. Investigative Radiology 2000; 35: 58-71
20. Albrecht T, Hoffmann CW, Wolf KJ. Sonographie von Lebermetastasen mit leberspezifischem Kontrastmittel. Radiologe 2001; 41: 8-15
21. Albrecht T, Blomley MJ, Heckemann RA et al. Stimulierte akustische Emission mit dem Ultraschall-Kontrastmittel Levovist: Ein klinisch nutzbarer Kontrasteffekt mit leberspezifischen Eigenschaften. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2000; 172: 61-67
22. Isozaki T, Numata K, Kiba T et al. Differential diagnosis of hepatic tumors by using contrast enhancement patterns at US. Radiology 2003; 229: 798-805
23. Borghi C, Aiani L, Sopransi M et al. Current state of the use of sonographic contrast agents with low acoustic pressure techniques in the study of focal liver lesions. Radiol Med (Torino) 2004; 107: 174-186; quiz 187-188
24. Quaia E, Calliada F, Bertolotto M et al. Characterization of focal liver lesions with contrast-specific US modes and a sulfur hexafluoride-filled microbubble contrast agent: diagnostic performance and confidence. Radiology 2004; 232: 420-430
25. Albrecht T. Kontrastmittelgestützter Ultraschall der Leber - Herausforderung und Chance für die deutsche Radiologie. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2003; 175: 889-891
26. Bryant TH, Blomley MJ, Albrecht T et al. Improved characterization of liver lesions with liver-phase uptake of liver-specific microbubbles: prospective multicenter study. Radiology 2004; 232: 799-809
27. Lemke AJ, Chopra SS, Hengst SA et al. Charakterisierung von Lebertumoren durch kontrastverstärkte Sonographie und digitale Graustufenbestimmung. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2004; 176: 1607-1616
28. Grimm J, Müller-Hülsbeck S, Blume J et al. Vergleich von Doppel-Spiral-CT und MnDPDP-verstärkter MRT zur Erfassung und Charakterisierung von Leberläsionen. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2001; 173: 266-272
29. Hori M, Murakami T, Kim T et al. CT Scan and MRI in the Differentiation of Liver Tumors. Digestive Diseases 2004; 22: 39-55
30. Numminen K, Halavaara J, Tervahartiala P et al. Liver tumour MRI: what do we need for lesion characterization? Scand J Gastroenterol 2004; 39: 67-73
31. Kim MJ, Kim JH, Lim JS et al. Detection and characterization of focal hepatic lesions: mangafodipir vs. superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004; 20: 612-621
32. Leen E. MultiHance-enhanced MRI in the characterisation of focal liver lesions. Eur Radiol 2004; 14 (Suppl 7): 031-35
33. Youk JH, Lee JM, Kim CS. MRI for detection of hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of mangafodipir trisodium and gadopentetate dimeglumine contrast agents. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004; 183: 1049-1054
34. Brannigan M, Burns PN, Wilson SR. Blood flow patterns in focal liver lesions at microbubble-enhanced US. Radiographics 2004; 24: 921-935
35. Solbiati L, Tonolini M, Cova L et al. The role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the detection of focal liver leasions. Eur Radiol 2001; 11 (Suppl 3): E15-26