Soil carbon stocks, mineralization rates, and CO2 effluxes under 10 tree species on contrasting soil types

Canadian Journal of Forest Research

Volumn 35, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 1277-1284

  Ladegaard Pedersen, Pernille ^a   Elberling, Bo ^a   Vesterdal, Lars ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b DANISH FOREST LANDSCAPE RES INST   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARBON; CARBON DIOXIDE; CHELATION; FORESTRY; MINERALS;

INCUBATION; SANDY SOILS; SOIL ORGANIC CARBON (SOC); TREE SPECIES;

SOILS;

AFFORESTATION; CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON FLUX; MINERALIZATION; SOIL CARBON; SOIL TYPE;

CARBON; CARBON DIOXIDE; CHELATION; FORESTS; MINERALS; SOIL;

EID: 26944469081     PISSN: 00455067     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/x05-045     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Bastrup-Birk, A., Hansen, K., Ro-Poulsen, H., Jørgensen, B.B., Mikkelsen, T., Pilegaard, K., and Bille-Hansen, J. 2003. Biomasse og Produktion. In Næeringsstofkredsløb i skove - Ionbalanceprojektet. Edited by K. Hansen. Forest and Landscape Research No. 33. Ministry of the Environment, Danish Forest and Landscape Research Institute, Hørsholm, Denmark. pp. 69-96. [In Danish.]
2. 2 concentrations by increasing carbon sequestration in the soil. Biol. Fertil. Soils, 3: 230-235.
3. Borken, W., Xu, Y-J., Davidson, E.A., and Beese, F. 2002. Site and temporal variation of soil respiration in European beech, Norway spruce, and Scot pine forest. Global Change Biol. 8: 1205-1216.
4. Bowden, R.D., Newkirk, K.M., and Rullo, G.M. 1998. Carbon di-oxide and methane fluxes by a forest soil under laboratory controlled moisture and temperature conditions. Soil Biol. Biochem. 30: 1591-1597.
5. Côté, L., Brown, S., Paré, D., Fyles, J., and Bauhus, J. 2000. Dynamics of carbon and nitrogen mineralization in relation to stand type, stand age and soil texture in the boreal mixedwood. Soil Biol. Biochem. 32: 1079-1090.
6. 2 efflux in a beech forest: comparison of two closed dynamic systems. Plant Soil, 124: 125-132.
7. 2 dynamics in a soil subject to freezing. J. Hydrol. 276: 159-175.
8. 2 release in frozen soil respiration and its implications for field studies of arctic C cycling. Soil Biol. Biochem. 35: 263-272.
9. 2 dynamics in temperate beech and spruce forest stands. Biogeochemistry. In press.
10. Epron, D., Dantec, V.L., Dufrene, E., and Granier, A. 2001. Seasonal dynamics of soil carbon dioxide efflux and simulated rhizophere respiration in a beech forest. Tree Physiol. 21: 145-152.
11. Eswaran, H., Van den Berg, E., and Reich, P. 1993. Organic carbon in soils of the world. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 57: 192-194.
12. Falloon, P.D., Smith, P., Smith, J.U., Szabo, J., Coleman, K., and Marshall, S. 1998. Regional estimates of carbon sequestration potential: linking the Rothamsted Carbon Model to GIS databases. Biol. Fertil. Soils, 27: 236-241.
13. 2 efflux on temperature. Soil Biol. Biochem. 33: 155-165.
14. Gaudinski, J.B., Trumbore, S.E., Davidson, E.A., and Zheng, S.H. 2000. Soil carbon cycling in a temperate forest: radiocarbon-based estimates of residence times, sequestration rates and partitioning of fluxes. Biogeochemistry, 51: 33-69.
15. Hall, G.M.J., Wiser, S.K., Allen, R.B., Beets, P.N., and Goulding, C.J. 2001. Strategies to estimate national forest carbon stocks from inventory data: the 1990 New Zealand baseline. Global Change Biol. 7: 389-403.
16. Hanson, P.J., Edwards, N.T., Garten, C.T., and Andrews, J.A. 2000. Separating root and soil microbial contributions to soil respiration: a review of methods and observations. Biogeochemistry, 48: 115-146.
17. Healy, R.W., Striegl, R.G., Russell, T.F., Hutchinson, G.L., and Livingston, G.P. 1996. Numerical evaluation of static-chamber measurements of soil-atmosphere gas exchange: identification of physical processes. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 60: 740-747.
18. Holmsgaard, E., and Bang, C. 1977. Et træartsforsøg med nåletræer, bøg og eg. De første 10 år. Forstl. Forsøgsv. Danm. 35: 159-196. [In Danish.]
19. Homann, P.S., Sollins, P., Chappell, H.N., and Stangenberger, A.G. 1995. Soil organic carbon in a mountainous forest region: relation to site characteristics. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 59: 1468-1475.
20. Houghton, R.A. 2003. Why are estimates of the terrestrial carbon balance so different. Global Change Biol. 9: 500-509.
21. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2001a. Climate Change 2001: mitigation. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment. Edited by G.O.P. Obasi and K. Töpfer. Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, UK.
22. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2001b. Climate Change 2001: the scientific basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment. Edited by J.T. Houghton, Y. Ding, D.J. Griggs, M. van der Noguer, P.J. Linden, and D. Xiaosu. Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, UK.
23. Kirschbaum, M.U.F. 1995. The temperature dependence of soil organic matter decomposition, and the effect of global warming on soil organic C storage. Soil Biol. Biochem. 27: 753-760.
24. Lange, M. 1993. Macromycetes under twelve tree species in ten plantations on various soil types in Denmark. Opera Bot. 120: 1-53.
25. Laursen, E.V., Thomsen, R.S., and Cappelen, J. 1999. Observed air temperature, humidity, pressure, cloud cover and weather in Denmark - with climatological standard normals, 1961-90. Danish Meteorological Institute, Ministry of Transport, Tech. Rep. 99-5.
26. Masera, O.R., Garza-Caligaris, J.F., Kanninen, M., Karjalainen, T., Liski, J., Nabuurs, G.J., Pussinen, A., de Jong B.H.J., and Mohren, G.M.J. 2003. Modeling carbon sequestration in afforestation, agroforestry and forest management projects: the CO2FIX V.2 approach. Ecol. Model. 164: 177-199.
27. Matejovic, I. 1993. Determination of carbon, hydrogen, and nitrogen in soils by automated elemental analysis (dry combustion method). Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 24: 2213-2222.
28. Paul, K.I., Polglase, P.J., Nyakuengama, J.G., and Khanna, P.K. 2002. Change in soil carbon following afforestation. For. Ecol. Manage. 168: 241-257.
29. Paul, K.I., Polglase, P.J., and Richards, G.P. 2003. Predicted change in soil carbon following afforestation or reforestation, and analysis of controlling factors by linking a C accounting model (CAMFor) to models of forest growth (3PG), litter decomposition (GENDEC) and soil C turnover (RothC). For. Ecol. Manage. 177: 485-501.
30. Ponge, J.-F., Chevalier, R., and Loussot, P. 2002. Humus index: an integrated tool for the assessment of forest floor and topsoil properties. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 66: 1996-2001.
31. Sanger, L.J., Cox, P., Splatt, P., Whelan, M., and Anderson, J.M. 1998. Variability in the quality and potential decomposability of Pinus sylvestris litter from sites with different soil characteristics: acid detergent fibre (ADF) and carbohydtare signatures. Soil Biol. Biochem. 30: 455-461.
32. Sariyildiz, T., and Anderson, J.M. 2003. Interactions between litter quality, decomposition and soil fertility: a laboratory study. Soil Biol. Biochem. 35: 391-399.
33. SAS Institute Inc. 1997. SAS/STAT software: changes and enhancements through release 6.12. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, N.C.
34. Vejre, H., Callesen, I., Vesterdal, L., and Raulund-Rasmussen, K. 2003. Carbon and nitrogen in Danish forest soils - contents and distribution determined by soil order. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 67: 335-343.
35. Vesterdal, L. 1999. Influence of soil type on mass loss and nutrient release from decomposing foliage litter of beech and Norway spruce. Can. J. For. Res. 29: 95-105.
36. Vesterdal, L., and Raulund-Rasmussen, K. 1998. Forest floor chemistry under seven tree species along a soil fertility gradient. Can. J. For. Res. 28: 1636-1647.
37. Winkler, J.P., Cherry, R.S., and Schlesinger, W.H. 1996. The Q(10) relationship of microbial respiration in a temperate forest soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 28: 1067-1072.