Using similarity to infer meta-cognitive behaviors during analogical problem solving

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 3538 LNAI, Issue , 2005, Pages 134-143

  Muldner, Kasia ^a   Conati, Cristina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; COMPUTER SCIENCE; LEARNING SYSTEMS; PROBLEM SOLVING; STUDENTS;

ANALOGICAL PROBLEM SOLVING; COMPUTATIONAL FRAMEWORK; METACOGNITIVE BEHAVIORS;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

EID: 26944442375     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/11527886_18     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Aleven, V. and K.D. Ashley. Teaching case-based argumentation through a model and examples: Empirical evaluation of an intelligent learning environment. in Artificial Intelligence in Education. 1997. Kobe, Japan.
2. Anderson, J.R., Rules of the Mind. 1993, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
3. Atkinson, R., S. Derry, A. Renkl, and D. Wortham, Learning from Examples: Instructional Principles from the Worked Examples Research. Review of Educational Research, 2002. 70(2): 181-214.
4. Chi, M.T.H., M. Bassok, M.W. Lewis, P. Reimann, and R. Glaser, Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 1989. 13: 145-182.
5. Chi, M.T.H., P. Feltovich, and R. Glaser, Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 1981. 5: 121-152.
6. Chi, M.T.H. and K. VanLehn, The content of physics self-explanations. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1991. 1: 69-105.
7. Conati, C, A. Gertner, and K. VanLehn, Using Bayesian Networks to Manage Uncertainty in Student Modeling. Journal of User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 2002. 12(4): 371-417.
8. Conati, C. and K. VanLehn, Toward Computer-based Support of Meta-cognitive Skills: A Computational Framework to Coach Self-Explanation. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 2000. 11: 389-415.
9. Murray, C. and K. VanLehn. DT Tutor: A decision-theoretic dynamic approach for optimal selection of tutorial actions, in 5'th Int. Conf. on ITS. 2000. Montreal, Canada.
10. Novick, L.R., Analogical transfer, problem similarity and expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 1988. 14: 510-520.
11. Quilici, J. and R. Mayer, Role of Examples in How students Learn to Categorize Statistics Word Problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1996. 88(1): 144-161.
12. Reed, S.K., A structure-mapping model for word problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 1987. 13: 124-139.
13. Reed, S.K., A. Dempster, and M. Ettinger, Usefulness of analogous solutions for solving algebra word problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 1985. 11: 106-125.
14. Sweller, J. and G.A. Cooper, The use of worked examples as a substitute for problem solving in learning algebra. Cognition and Instruction, 1985. 2(1): 59-89.
15. VanLehn, K., Analogy Events: How Examples are Used During Problem Solving. Cognitive Science, 1998. 22(3): 347-388.
16. VanLehn, K., Rule-Learning Events in the Acquisition of a Complex Skill: An Evaluation of Cascade. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1999. 8(1): 71-125.
17. VanLehn, K. and R.M. Jones, Better learners use analogical problem solving sparingly, in Machine Learning: Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Conference, P.E. Utgoff, Editor. 1993, Morgan Kaufmann: San Mateo, CA. 338-345.
18. Weber, G., Individual Selection of Examples in an Intelligent Learning Environment. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 1996. 7(1): 3-33.