The identification of exemplar change in the Wife of Bath's Prologue using the maximum chi-squared method

Literary and Linguistics Computing

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 189-204

  Windram, Heather F ^a   Howe, Christopher J ^a   Spencer, Matthew ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 26844565873     PISSN: 02681145     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/llc/fqi001     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Barbrook, A. C., Howe, C. J., Blake, N., and Robinson, P. (1998). The phylogeny of The Canterbury Tales. Nature, 394: 839.
2. Beadle, R. (1997). Geoffrey Spirleng (c.1426-c.1494): A scribe of the Canterbury Tales in his time. In Robinson, P. and Zim, R. (eds), Of the Making of Books: Medieval Manuscripts, their Scribes and Readers Aldershot: Scolar Press, pp. 116-46.
3. Blake, N. F. (1997). The project's lineation system. In Blake, N. and Robinson, P. (eds), The Canterbury Tales Project: Occasional Papers, Vol. II, London: Office for Humanities Communication Publications, pp. 5-14.
4. Howe, C. J., Barbrook, A. C., Spencer, M., Robinson, P., Bordalejo, B., and Mooney, L. R. (2001). Manuscript evolution. Trends in Genetics, 17: 147-52.
5. Maddison, D. R., Swofford, D. L., and Maddison, W. P. (1997). NEXUS: An extensible file format for systematic information. Systematic Biology, 46: 590-621.
6. Manly, J. M., and Rickert, E. (eds) (1940). The Text of the Canterbury Tales: Studied on the Basis of All Known Manuscripts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7. Maynard Smith, J. (1992). Analysing the mosaic structure of genes. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 34: 126-9.
8. Mooney, L. R. Chaucer's scribe. Speculum, in press.
9. Owen, C. A., Jr. (1991). The Manuscripts of the Canterbury Tales. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer.
10. Posada, D. (2002). Evaluation of methods for detecting recombination from DNA sequences: Empirical data. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 19: 708-17.
11. Posada, D. and Crandall, K. A. (2001). Evaluation of methods for detecting recombination from DNA sequences: Computer simulations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98: 13757-62.
12. Robinson, P. (1994). Collate: Interactive Collation of Large Textual Traditions. Oxford: Oxford University Centre for Humanities Computing.
13. Robinson, P. (ed.) (1996). Chaucer: The Wife of Bath's Prologue on CD-ROM. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Robinson, P. (1997). A stemmatic analysis of the fifteenth-century witnesses to The Wife of Bath's Prologue. In Blake, N. and Robinson, P. (eds), The Canterbury Tales Project: Occasional Papers, Vol. II, London: Office for Humanities Communication Publications, pp. 69-132.
15. Saitou, N. and Nei, M. (1987). The Neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 4: 406-25.
16. Sokal, R. R. and Rohlf, F. J. (1995). Biometry. New York: W. H. Freeman and Co.
17. Solopova, E. (1997). The problem of authorial variants in the Wife of Bath's Prologue. In Blake, N. and Robinson, P. (eds), The Canterbury Tales Project: Occasional Papers, Vol. II, London: Office for Humanities Communication Publications, pp. 133-42.
18. 2 method of detecting recombination. Bioinformatics, 19: 1368-70.
19. Spencer, M., Bordalejo, B., Wang, L.-S., et al. (2003). Analysing the order of items in manuscripts of The Canterbury Tales. Computers and the Humanities, 37: 97-109.
20. Spencer, M., Wachtel, K., and Howe, C. J. (2004). Representing multiple pathways of textual flow in the Greek manuscripts of the Letter of James using reduced median networks. Computers and the Humanities 38: 1-14.
21. Stubbs, E. (2000). General introduction. In Stubbs, E. (ed.), The Hengwrt Chaucer Digital Facsimile, Leicester: Scholarly Digital Editions.
22. Swofford, D. L. (2001). PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and other methods). Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
23. Wattel, E. and van Mulken, M. J. P. (1996). Shock waves in text traditions. In van Reenan, P. and van Mulken, M. J. P. (eds), Studies in Stemmatology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 105-21.