Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics and their changes in women with high tetraplegia

Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 63-78

  Parrilla, Zoraya ^a   Gómez Marín, Orlando ^a,b   Sipski, Marca ^a,b   Thomas, George ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI MILLER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Demographics; Spinal cord injury; Tetraplegia; Women

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; CASE STUDY; CHILD; CLINICAL FEATURE; DECUBITUS; DEMOGRAPHY; DISABILITY; EDUCATION; EMPLOYMENT; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; INDWELLING CATHETER; LIFE SATISFACTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MARRIAGE; NEUROLOGIC EXAMINATION; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PNEUMONIA; QUADRIPLEGIA; SCORING SYSTEM; SOCIAL ASPECT; SPINAL CORD INJURY; VENTILATOR;

EID: 26844548830     PISSN: 10820744     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1310/MEP4-TLLJ-EVRN-DDCN     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Nobunaga AI, Go BK, Karunas RB. Recent demographic and injury trends in people served by the model spinal cord injury care systems. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80:1372-1382.
2. Price C, Makintubee S, Herndon W, et al. Epidemiology of traumatic spinal cord injury and acute hospitalization and rehabilitation charges for spinal cord injuries in Oklahoma, 1988-1990. Am J Epidemiol. 1994;139:37-47.
3. Acton PA, Parley T, Freni LW, et al. Traumatic spinal cord injury in Arkansas, 1980-1989. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;74:1035-1040.
4. Pentland W, Walker J, Minnes P, et al. Women with spinal cord injury and the impact of aging. Spinal Cord. 2002;40:374-387.
5. McColl M, Charlifue S, Glass C, et al. Aging, gender, and spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:363-367.
6. Krause J, Broderick L. Outcomes after spinal cord injury: comparisons as a function of gender and race and ethnicity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:355-362.
7. Whiteneck G, Tate D, Charlifue S. Predicting community reintegration after spinal cord injury from demographic and injury characteristics. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80:1485-1491.
8. Tate DG, Kalpakjian CZ, Forchheimer MB. Quality of life issues in individuals with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83(12 suppl 2):S18-25.
9. Hall K, Knudsen S, Wright J, et al. Follow-up study on individuals with high tetraplegia (C1-C4) 14 to 24 years postinjury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80:1507-1513.
10. Guide for the Uniform Data Set for Medical Rehabilitation (adult FIM), Version 5.1. Buffalo, NY: State University of New York at Buffalo; 1997.
11. American Spinal Injury Association. International Standards for Neurological and Functional Classification of Spinal Cord Injury-Revised. Chicago, IL: ASIA; 1996.
12. Diener E, Emmons R, Larsen R, et al. The Satisfaction with Life Scale. J Pers J Assess. 1985;49:71-75.
13. Whiteneck GG, Charlifue SW, Gerhart KA, et al. Quantifying handicap: a new measure of long-term rehabilitation outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992;73:519-526.
14. Center on Outcome Measurement in Brain Injury website. Accessed at: www.tbims.org/ combi/chartsf.
15. DeVivo M. Epidemiology of traumatic spinal cord injury. In: Kirshblum S, Campagnolo DI, DeLisa JA, eds. Spinal Cord Medicine. Philadelphia, PA. Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 2002:69-81.
16. Acton PA, Parley T, Freni LW, et al. Traumatic spinal cord injury in Arkansas, 1980 to 1989. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;74:1035-1040.
17. Colorado Department of Health. 1996 Annual Report of the Spinal Cord Injury Early Notification System. Denver, CO: Colorado Department of Transportation Printing Office; 1997.
18. DeVivo MJ, Fine PR. Spinal cord injury: its short-term impact on marital status. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1985;66:501-504.
19. Krause JS, Kewman D, DeVivo M, et al. Employment after spinal cord injury: an analysis of cases from the model spinal cord injury systems. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80:1492-1500.
20. DeVivo MJ, Black KJ, Stover SL. Causes of death during the first 12 years after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;74:248-254.
21. Claxton AR, Wong DT, Chung F, et al. Predictors of hospital mortality and mechanical ventilation in patients with cervical spinal cord injury. Can J Anaesth. 1998;45(2):144-149.
22. McKinley WO, Jackson AB, Cardenas DD, et al. Long-term medical complications after traumatic spinal cord injury: a regional model systems analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80:1402-1410.
23. Chen D, Apple DF, Hudson LM, et al. Medical complications during acute rehabilitation following spinal cord injury-current experience of the model systems. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80:1397-1401.
24. Jackson AB, Groomes TE. Incidence of respiratory complications following spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75:270-275.
25. Rodriguez GP, Garber SL. Prospective study of pressure ulcer risk in spinal cord injury patients. Paraplegia. 1981;19:235-247.
26. Richardson RR, Meyer PR. Prevalence and incidence of pressure sores in acute spinal cord injuries. Paraplegia. 1981;19:235-247.
27. Carlson CE, King BB, Kirk PM. Incidence and correlates of pressure ulcer development after spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Nurs Res. 1992;1:34-40.
28. Fuhrer MJ, Garber SL, Rintala DH, et al. Pressure ulcers in community-resident persons with spinal cord injury: prevalence and risk factors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;74:1172-1177.
29. Marino RJ, Ditunno JF, Donovan WH, et al. Neurologic recovery after traumatic spinal cord injury, data from the model spinal cord injury systems. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80:1391-1396.
30. Sipski ML, Jackson A, Gómez-Marín O, et al. Effects of gender on functional recovery and potential following spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:1826-1836.