Methodology for the steady-state operability analysis of plantwide systems

Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research

Volumn 44, Issue 20, 2005, Pages 7770-7786

  Subramanian, Sivakumar ^a,c   Georgakis, Christos ^a,b  

^a Lehigh University   (United States)

^b Tufts University   (United States)

^c Invensys India Private Limited   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACHIEVABLE PRODUCTION OUTPUT SPACE (APOS); ENERGY SAVINGS; MASS AND HEAT INTEGRATION; PLANT DESIGN;

CONTROL SYSTEMS; DESIGN; ENERGY UTILIZATION; PROCESS CONTROL;

INDUSTRIAL PLANTS;

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING;

EID: 26844531704     PISSN: 08885885     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ie0490076     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Ziegler, J. G.; Nichols, N. B. Process lags in automatic control circuits. Trans. ASME 1943, 65, 433.
2. Morari, M.; Perkins, J. Design for operations. In 4th International Conference on Foundations of computer aided process design, Biegler, L. T., Doherty, M. F., Eds.; AIChE: New York, 1994; pp 105-114.
3. Swaney, R. E.; Grossmann, I. E. An index for operational flexibility in chemical process design. Part I: Formulation and theory. AIChE J. 1985, 31, 621-630.
4. Dimitriadis, V.; Pistikopoulos, E. Flexibility analysis of dynamic systems. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1995, 34, 4451-4462.
5. Bahri, P. A.; Bandoni, A.; Romagnoli, J. Effect of disturbances in optimizing control: Steady-state open-loop backoff problem. AIChE J. 1996, 42, 983-994.
6. Bahri, P. A.; Bandoni, J. A.; Romagnoli, J. A. Integrated flexibility and controllability analysis in design of chemical processes. AIChE J. 1997, 43, 997-1015.
7. Russo, L. P.; Bequette, B. W. Impact of process design on the multiplicity behavior of a jacketted exothermic CSTR. AIChE J. 1995, 41, 135-147.
8. Vinson, D. R.; Georgakis, C. A new measure of process output controllability. In DYCOPS-5, 5th IFAC symposium on dynamics and control of process systems; Georgakis, C., Ed.; Pergamon Press: Elmsford, NY, 1998; pp 700-709.
9. Vinson, D. R.; Georgakis, C. A new measure of process output controllability. J. Proc. Control 2000, 10, 185-194.
10. Subramanian, S.; Georgakis, C. Steady-state operabilty characteristics of idealized reactors. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2001, 56, 5111-5130.
11. Uztürk, D.; Georgakis, C. Inherent dynamic operability of processes: General definitions and analysis of SISO cases. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2002, 41, 421-432.
12. Uztürk, D. Dynamic Operability of Processes. Ph.D. Thesis, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, Nov. 2001.
13. Subramanian, S.; Uztürk, D.; Georgakis, C. An optimization-based approach for the operability analysis of continuously stirred tank reactors. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2001, 40, 4238-4252.
14. Gilliland, E. R.; Gould, L. A.; Boyle, T. J. Dynamic effects of material recycle. In Preprints of Joint Automatic Control Conference; Stanford, CA, 1964; p 140.
15. Verykios, X.; Luyben, W. L. Steady-state sensitivity and dynamics of a reactor/distillation column system with recycle. ISA Trans. 1978, 17, 31.
16. Denn, M. M.; Lavie, R. Dynamics of plants with recycle. Chem. Eng. J. 1982, 24, 55.
17. Papadourakis, A.; Doherty, M. F.; Douglas, J. M. Relative gain array for units in plants with recycle. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1987, 26, 1259-1262.
18. Luyben, W. L. Dynamics and control of recycle systems. 1. Simple open-loop and closed-loop systems. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1993, 32, 466.
19. Luyben, W. L. Dynamics and control of recycle systems. 2. Comparison of alternative process designs. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1993, 32, 476.
20. Luyben, W. L. Dynamics and control of recycle systems. 3. Alternative process designs including ternary systems. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1993, 32, 1142.
21. Tyreus, B. D.; Luyben, W. L. Dynamics and control of recycle systems. 4. Ternary systems with one or two recycle streams. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1993, 32, 1154.
22. Morud, J.; Skogestad, S. Dynamic behavior of integrated plants. J. Proc. Control 1996, 6, 145-156.
23. Seferlis, P.; Grievink, J. Plant design based on economic and static controllability criteria. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference of Foundations of Computer-Aided Process Design; American Institute of Chemical Engineers: New York, 1999; p 346.
24. Groenendijk, A.; Dimian, A. C.; Iedema, P. D. Systems approach for evaluating dynamics and plantwide control of complex plants. AIChE J. 2000, 46, 133-145.
25. Solovyev, B.; Lewin, D. R. A steady-state process resiliency index for nonlinear processes. 1. Analysis. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2003, 42, 4506.
26. Solovyev, B.; Lewin, D. R. A steady-state process resiliency index for nonlinear processes. 2. Applications. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2004, 43, 6453.
27. Lewin, D. R. A simple tool for disturbance resiliency diagnosis and feedforward control design. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1996, 20, 13-25.
28. Luyben, W. L.; Tyréus, B. D.; Luyben, M. L. Plantwide process control; McGraw-Hill: New York, 1999.
29. Price, R. M.; Georgakis, C. Plantwide regulatory control design procedure using a tiered framework. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1993, 32, 2693-2705.
30. Banerjee, A.; Arkun, Y. Control configuration design applied to the Tennessee Eastman plant-wide control problem. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1995, 19, 453-480.
31. Downs, J. J.; Vogel, E. F. A plant-wide industrial process control problem. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1993, 17, 245.
32. Wu, K.-L.; Yu, C.-C. Reactor/separator processes with recycle. 1. Candidate control structure for operability. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1996, 20, 1291-1316.
33. Samsatli, N. J.; Papageorgiou, L. G.; Shah, N. Robustness metrics for dynamic optimization models under uncertainty. AIChE J. 1998, 44, 1993-2006.
34. Yi, C. K.; Luyben, W. L. Evaluation of plant-wide control structures by steady-state disturbance analysis. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1995, 34, 2393-2405.
35. Luyben, W. L. Tradeoffs between design and control in chemical reactor systems. J. Proc. Control 1993, 3, 17-41.
36. Luyben, W. L. Snowball effects in reactor/separator processes with recycle. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1994, 33, 299-305.
37. Jaisathaporn, P. Tradeoffs between load rejection and switchability. Master's Thesis, Lehigh University, Bethehem, PA, 2000.
38. McAvoy, T. J.; Ye, N. Base control for the Tennessee Eastman problem. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1994, 18, 383-413.
39. Lyman, P. R.; Georgakis, C. Plant-wide control of the Tennessee Eastman problem. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1995, 19, 321-331.
40. Ricker, N. L. Decentralized control of the Tennessee Eastman challenge process. J. Proc. Control 1996, 6, 205-221.
41. Kanadibhotla, R. S.; Riggs, J. B. Nonlinear model based control of a recycle reactor process. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1995, 19, 933-948.
42. Ricker, N. L.; Lee, J. H. Nonlinear model predictive control of the Tennesse Eastman challenge process. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1995, 19, 961-981.
43. Sriniwas, G. R.; Arkun, Y. Control of the Tennessee Eastman process using input-output models. J. Proc. Control 1997, 7, 387-400.
44. Ricker, N. L. Optimal steady-state operation of the Tennessee Eastman challenge process. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1995, 19, 949-959.
45. Ricker, N. L.; Lee, J. H. Nonlinear modeling and state estimation for the Tennessee Eastman challenge process. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1995, 19, 983-1005.