Communication in a fund-raising marathon group

Journal of Communication

Volumn 55, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 257-276

  Kramer, Michael W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION;

EID: 26844517464     PISSN: 00219916     EISSN: 14602466     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/joc/55.2.257     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Albrecht, T. L., & Adelman, M. B. (1987). Communicating social support. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2. Buchalter, R. (2003). Negotiating (im)permeable neighborhood borders. In L. R. Frey (Ed.), Group communication in context: Studies of bona fide groups (2nd ed., pp. 57-82). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Cattel, R. B. (1951). New concepts for measuring leadership, in terms of group syntality. Human Relations, 4, 161-184.
4. Creswell, J. W. (1997). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5. Dennis, A. R., & Valacich, J. S. (1993). Computer brainstorms: More heads are better than one. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 531-537.
6. Fetterman, D. M. (1989). Ethnography: Step by step. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
7. Fisher, B. A. (1970). Decision emergence: Phases in group decision making. Speech Monographs, 37, 53-66.
8. Frey, L. R. (2003). Introduction. In L. R. Frey (Ed.), Group communication in context: Studies of bona fide groups (2nd ed., pp. 1-20). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Goodman, L. P., & Goodman, R. A. (1972). Theater as a temporary system. California Management Review, 15, 103-108.
10. Gouran, D. S. (1999). Communication in groups: The emergence and evolution of a field of study. In L. R. Frey, D. S. Gouran, & M. S. Poole (Eds.), The handbook ofgroup communication theory and research (pp. 3-36). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Hooghe, M. (2003). Participation in voluntary associations and value indicators: The effect of current and previous participation experiences. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 32, 47-69.
12. Howell, S., Brock, B., & Hauser, E. (2003). A multicultural, intergenerational youth program: Creating and sustaining a youth community group. In L. R. Frey (Ed.), Group communication in context Studies of bona fide groups (2nd ed., pp. 85-107). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Keyton, J. (1999). Group communication: Process and analysis. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
14. Keyton, J., & Stallworth, V. (2003). On the verge of collaboration: Interaction processes versus group outcomes. In L. R. Frey (Ed.), Group communication in context: Studies of bona fide groups (2nd ed., pp. 235-260). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Kramer, M. W. (2001). Communication in a community theater group: Managing multiple group roles. Communication Studies, 53, 151-170.
16. Lammers, J. C., & Krikorian, D. H. (1997). Theoretical extension and operationalization of the bona fide group construct with an application to surgical teams. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 25, 17-18.
17. Lindlof, T. R. (1995). Qualitative communication research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18. Moreland, R. L., & Levine, J. M. (1982). Socialization in small groups: Temporal changes in individual-group relations. Advances in experimental and social psychology, 15, 137-192.
19. Petronio, S., Jones, S., & Morr, M. C. (2003). Family privacy dilemmas: Managing communication boundaries within family groups. In L. R. Frey (Ed.), Group communication in context: Studies of bona fide groups (2nd ed., pp. 23-55). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Poole, M. S. (1990). Do we have any theories of group communication? Communication Studies, 41, 237-247.
21. Poole, M. S. (1999). Group communication theory. In L. R. Frey, D. S. Gouran, & M. S. Poole (Eds.), The handbook of group communication theory and research (pp. 37-70). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22. Poole, M. S., Keyton, J., & Frey, L. R. (1999). Group communication methodology: Issues and considerations. In L. R. Frey, D. S. Gouran, & M. S. Poole (Eds.), The handbook of group communication theory and research (pp. 92-112). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23. Putnam, L. L. (1983). Paradigms for organizational communication research: An overview and synthesis. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 46, 192-206.
24. Putnam, L. L. (1994). Revitalizing small group communication: Lessons learned from a bona fide group perspective. Communication Studies, 45 97-102.
25. Putnam, L. L. (2003). Rethinking the nature of groups: A bona fide group perspective. In R. Y. Kirokawa, R. S. Cathcart, L. A. Samovar, & L. D. Henman (Eds.), Small group communication theory and practice: An anthology (8th ed., pp. 8-16). Los Angeles: Roxbury.
26. Putnam, L. L., & Stohl, C. (1990). Bona fide groups: A reconceptualization of groups in context. Communication Studies, 41 248-265.
27. Putnam, L. L., & Stohl, C. (1996). Bona fide groups: An alternative perspective for communication and small group decision making. In R. Y. Hirokawa & M. S. Poole (Eds.), Communication and group decision making (2nd ed., pp. 147-178). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28. Rubin, R. B., Rubin, A. M., & Piele, L. J. (2000). Communication research: Strategies and sources (5th ed.). Stamford, CT: Wadsworth.
29. Salazar, A. J. (1995). Understanding the synergistic effects of communication in small groups: Making the most out of group member abilities. Small Group Research, 26, 169-199.
30. Salazar, A. J., Hirokawa, R. Y., Propp, K. M., Julian, K. M., & Leatham, G. B. (1994). In search of true causes: Examination of the effect of group potential and group interaction on decision performance. Human Communication Research, 20, 529-559.
31. Shaw, M. E. (1981). Group dynamics: The psychology of small group behavior (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
32. Stohl, C., & Holmes, M. E. (1992). A functional perspective for bona fide groups. In S. A. Deetz (Ed.), Communication yearbook, 16 (pp. 601-614). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
33. Stohl, C., & Putnam, L. L. (2003). Communication in bona fide groups: A retrospective and prospective account. In L. R. Frey (Ed.), Group communication in context: Studies of bona fide groups (2nd ed., pp. 399-414). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
34. Tracy, K., & Standerfer, C. (2003). Selecting a school superintendent: Sensitivities in group deliberations. In L. R. Frey (Ed.), Group communication in context: Studies of bona fide groups (2nd ed., pp. 109-134). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
35. Tziner, A., & Eden, D. (1985) Effects of crew composition on crew performance: Does the whole equal the sum of the parts? Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 85-93.
36. Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Aministrative Science Quarterly, 21, 1-19.