On the verge of collaboration: Interaction processes versus group outcomes

Group Communication in Context: Studies of Bona Fide Groups, Second Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 235-260

  Keyton, Joann ^a   Stallworth, Virginia ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

^b Child Advocacy Center in Memphis   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85076264947     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (27)

1. Berman, E. M., & West, J. P. (1995). Public-private leadership and the role of nonprofit organizations in local government: The case of social services. Policy Studies Review, 14, 235-246.
2. Brewer, M. B. (1995). Managing diversity: The role of social identities. In S. E. Jackson & M. N. Ruderman (Eds.), Diversity in work teams: Research paradigms for a changing workplace (pp. 47-68). Washington, DC: American Psycho-logical Association.
3. Chrislip, D. D., & Larson, C. E. (1994). Collaborative leadership: How citizens and civic leaders can make a difference. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
4. DeLamater, J. (1974). A definition of “group.�? Small Group Behavior, 5, 30-44.
5. Gray, B. (1985). Conditions facilitating interorganizational collaboration. Human Relations, 38, 911-936.
6. Gray, B. (1989). Collaborating: Finding common ground for multiparty prob-lems. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
7. Gray, B., & Wood, D. J. (1991). Collaborative alliances: Moving from practice to theory. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27, 3-22.
8. Hackman, J. R. (Ed.). (1990). Groups that work (and those that don’t): Creating conditions for effective teamwork. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
9. Hargrove, R. (1998). Mastering the art of creative collaboration. New York: McGraw-Hill.
10. Iles, P. A., & Auluck, R. (1990). From organizational to interorganizational develop-ment in nursing practice: Improving the effectiveness ofinterdisciplinaryteam-work and interagency collaboration. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 15, 50-58.
11. Keyton, J. (1999). Relational communication in groups. In L. R. Frey (Ed.), D. S. Gouran, & M. S. Poole (Assoc. Eds.), The handbook of group communication theory & research (pp. 192-222). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12. Johnson, P., &Cahn, K. (1995). Improving child welfare practice through improvements in attorney-social worker relationships. Child Welfare, 74, 383-394.
13. Lammers, J. C., & Krikorian, D. H. (1997). Theoretical extension and operationali-zation ofthe bona fide group construct with an application to surgical teams. Journal ofApplied Communication Research, 25, 17-38.
14. Logsdon, J. M. (1991). Interests and interdependence in the formation of social problem-solving collaborations. Journal ofApplied Behavioral Science, 27, 23-37.
15. McGrath, J. E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
16. Mohan, M. L. (1993). Organizational communication and cultural vision: Approaches for analysis. Albany: State University of New York Press.
17. Putnam, L. L., & Stohl, C. (1996). Bona fide groups: An alternative perspective for communication and small group decision making. In R. Y. Hirokawa & M. S. Poole (Eds.), Communication and group decision making (2nd ed., pp. 147-178). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18. Quinn, D., & Cumblad, C. (1994). Service providers’ perceptions of interagency collaboration in their communities. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 2, 109-116.
19. Stallworth, V. (1998). Building a model of interorganizational nonprofit collaboration. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Memphis, TN.
20. Stegelin, D. A., & Jones, S. D. (1991). Components of early childhood interagency collaboration: Results of a statewide survey. Early Education and Development, 2, 54-67.
21. Stohl, C. (1995). Organizational communication: Connectedness in action. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22. Stohl, C., &Walker, K. (2002). Abona fide perspective for the future of groups: Understanding collaborating groups. In L. R. Frey (Ed.), New directions in group communication (pp. 237-252). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23. Taber, T. D., Walsh, J. T., & Cooke, R. A. (1979). Developing a community-based program for reducing the social impact of a plant closing. Journal of Applied Behavioral Sciences, 15, 133-155.
24. Wageman, R. (1995). Interdependence and group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 145-180.
25. Wood, D. J., & Gray, B. (1991). Toward a comprehensive theory of collaboration. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27, 139-162.
26. Yon, M. G., Mickelson, R. A., & Carlton-LaNey, I. (1993). A child’s place: De-veloping interagency collaboration on behalfofhomeless children. Education and Urban Society, 25, 410-423.
27. York, A., & Zychlinski, E. (1996). Competing nonprofit organizations also collaborate. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 7, 15-27.