The validation of a use innovativeness scale

European Journal of Innovation Management

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 471-481

  Girardi, Antonia ^a   Soutar, Geoffrey N ^b   Ward, Steven ^a  

^a MURDOCH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

Factor analysis; Mathematical modelling; Measurement

Indexed keywords

EID: 26844508450     PISSN: 14601060     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/14601060510627830     Document Type: Review

References (20)

1. Browne, M.W. and Cudeck, R. (1993), "Alternative ways of assessing model fit", in Bollen, K.A. (Ed.), Structural Equations with Latent Variables, Wiley, New York, NY.
2. Byrne, B.M. (1989), A Primer of LISREL, Springer-Verlag, New York, NY.
3. Byrne, B. (1998), Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL, PRELIS and SIMPLIS: Basic Concepts, Applications and Programming, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
4. Cronbach, L.J. (1951), "Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests", Psychometrika, Vol. 16 No. 3, pp. 297-334.
5. Flynn, L.R., Goldsmith, R.E. and Eastman, J.K. (1996), "Opinion leaders and opinion seekers: two new measurement scales", Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 24 No. 2, pp. 137-47.
6. Foxall, G.R. (1995), "Cognitive styles of consumer initiators", Technovation, Vol. 15 No. 5, pp. 269-88.
7. Goldsmith, R.E. (1990), "The validity of a scale to measure global innovativeness", The Journal of Applied Business Research, Vol. 7 No. 2, pp. 89-97.
8. Hirschman, E.C. (1980), "Innovativeness, novelty seeking and consumer creativity", Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 7 No. 3, pp. 283-95.
9. Holmes-Smith, P. and Rowe, K. (1994), "The development and use of congeneric measurement models in school effectiveness research: improving the reliability and validity of composite and latent variables for fitting multilevel and structural equation models", paper presented at the International Congress for School Effectiveness and Improvement, Melbourne.
10. Hu, L., Bentler, P.M. and Kano, Y. (1992), "Can test statistics in covariance structure analysis be trusted?", Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 112 No. 2, pp. 351-62.
11. Joreskog, K.G. and Sorbom, D. (1993), LISREL 8: Structural Equation Modelling with the SIMPLIS Command Language, Scientific Software International, Chicago, IL.
12. Kline, R.B. (1998), Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, Guildford Press, New York, NY.
13. Marsh, H.W. (1994), "Confirmatory factor analysis models of factorial invariance: a multifaceted approach", Structural Equation Modelling, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 5-34.
14. Midgley, D.F. and Dowling, G.R. (1978), "Innovativeness: the concept and its measurement", Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 4 No. 4, pp. 229-42.
15. Nunnally, C.J. and Bernstein, H.I. (1994), Psychometric Theory, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
16. Price, L. and Ridgway, N.M. (1983), "Development of scale to measure use innovativeness", in Bagozzi, R. and Trybout, A. (Eds), Advances in Consumer Research, Association for Consumer Research, Ann-Arbor, MI, pp. 681-2.
17. Steenkamp, J., Hostede, F. and Wedel, M. (1999), "A cross-national investigation into the individual and national cultural antecedents of consumer innovativeness", Journal of Marketing, Vol. 63 No. 2, pp. 55-69.
18. Tabachnik, B.G. and Fidell, L.S. (1989), Using Multivariate Statistics, Harper & Row, New York, NY.
19. Venkatraman, M.P. and Price, L. (1990), "Differentiating between cognitive and sensory innovativeness", Journal of Business Research, Vol. 20 No. 4, pp. 293-315.
20. Ward, S. and Soutar, G. (1997), "Consumer acquisition patterns for durable goods and financial assets: a rasch analysis", Applied Economics, Vol. 29 No. 5, pp. 903-11.