OK, who's got number one? Permeable Triadic Dialogue, covert participation and the co-construction of checking episodes

Language Teaching Research

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 403-422

  Gourlay, Lesley ^a  

^a EDINBURGH NAPIER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 26844494490     PISSN: 13621688     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1191/1362168805lr175oa     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Berry, M. 1981: Systemic linguistics and discourse analysis: a multi-layered approach to exchange structure. In Coulthard, M. and Montgomery, M., editors, Studies in discourse analysis. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 120-45.
2. Erickson, F. 1982: Classroom discourse as improvisation: relationships between academic task structure and social participation structure in lessons. In Wilkinson, L., editor, Communication in the classroom. London: Academic Press, 153-81.
3. Foster, P. 1998: A classroom perspective on the negotiation of meaning. Applied Linguistics 19(1): 1-23.
4. Halliday, M. 1984: Language as code and language as behaviour: a systemic functional interpretation of the nature and ontogenesis of language. In Fawcett, R., Halliday, M., Lamb, S. and Makkai, A., editors, The semiotics of culture and language, Vol. 1. London: Frances Pinter, 3-35.
5. Lemke, J. 1990: Talking science: language, learning and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
6. Leontiev, A. 1981: The problem of activity in psychology. In Wertsch, J., editor, The concept of activity in Soviet psychology. Armonk, NY: Sharpe: 37-71.
7. Martin, J. 1992: English texts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
8. Musumeci, D. 1996: Teacher-learner negotiation in content-based instruction: communication at cross-purposes? Applied Linguistics 17(3): 286-325.
9. Nassaji, H. and Wells, G. 2000: What's the use of 'triadic dialogue'? An investigation of teacher-student interaction. Applied Linguistics: 21(3): 376-406.
10. Nunn, R. 2000: Language learning across boundaries: negotiating classroom rituals. Paper presented at the annual conference of the British Association of Applied Linguistics, Cambridge.
11. Pica, T. 1994: Research on negotiation: what does it reveal about second language learning conditions, processes, outcomes? Language Learning 44(3): 493-527.
12. Sinclair, J. and Coulthard, M. 1975: Towards an analysis of discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13. Ulichny, P. 1996: Performed conversations in an ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly 30(4): 739-65.
14. Walsh, S. 2002: Construction or obstruction: teacher talk and learner involvement in the EFL classroom. Language Teaching Research 6(1): 3-23.
15. Wells, G. 1993: Re-evaluating the IRF sequence: a proposal for the articulation of theories of activity and discourse for the analysis of teaching and learning in the classroom. Linguistics and Education 5: 1-38.
16. Wells, G. 1996: Using the toolkit of discourse in the activity of learning and teaching. Mind, Culture and Activity 3(2): 74-101.