Correlational analysis of proteins and nonmetallic nanoparticles in a deep-nulling microscope

Journal of Physical Chemistry B

Volumn 109, Issue 38, 2005, Pages 18162-18170

  Hilbert, Michael ^a   Hippchen, Hendrik ^a   Wehling, Axel ^b   Walla, Peter J ^a,b  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR BIOPHYSICAL CHEMISTRY   (Germany)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF BRAUNSCHWEIG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIFFUSION; FLUORESCENCE; NANOSTRUCTURED MATERIALS; PHOTONS; POLYMERS; POLYSTYRENES; REFRACTIVE INDEX;

LABEL-FREE MICROSCOPIC ANALYSIS; POLYMER DIFFUSION; PROTEIN COMPLEX;

PROTEINS;

BACTERIAL PROTEIN; NANOPARTICLE; PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; INTERFEROMETRY; METHODOLOGY; MICROSCOPY; PHOTOSYSTEM I; SYNECHOCOCCUS;

BACTERIAL PROTEINS; INTERFEROMETRY; MICROSCOPY; NANOPARTICLES; PHOTOSYSTEM I PROTEIN COMPLEX; PROTEINS; SYNECHOCOCCUS;

EID: 26844468806     PISSN: 15206106     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jp052204d     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Gryczynski, Z.; Gryczynski, I.; Lakowicz, J. R. Biophotonics, Part A 2003, 360, 44.
2. Moerner, W. E.; Orrit, M. Science 1999, 283, 1670.
3. Ambrose, W. P.; Goodwin, P. M.; Jett, J. H.; van Orden, A.; Werner, H. J.; Keller, R. A. Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 2929.
4. Deniz, A. A.; Laurence, T. A.; Dahan, M.; Chemla, D. S.; Schultz, P. G.; Weiss, S. Anna. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2001, 52, 233.
5. Eigen, M.; Rigler, R. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1994, 91, 5740.
6. Kulzer, F.; Orrit, M. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2004, 55, 585.
7. Kuhnemuth, R.; Seidel, C. A. M. Single Mol. 2001, 2, 251.
8. Moerner, W. E.; Fromm, D. P. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2003, 74, 3597.
9. Xie, X. S.; Trautmann, J. K. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 1998, 49, 441.
10. Noji, H. Y. R.; Yoshida, M.; Kinosita, K. Nature 1997, 386, 299.
11. Yildiz A.; Forkey, J. N.; McKinney S. A.; Ha, T.; Goldman, Y. E.; Selvin, P. R. Science 2003, 300, 2061.
12. Schwille, P. In Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy: Theory and Applications; Springer Series in Chemical Physics; Springer-Verlag: New York, 2001, p 360.
13. Eigen, M.; Rigler, R. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1994, 91, 5740.
14. Walla, P. J.; Jelezko, F.; Tamarat, P.; Lounis, B.; Orrit, M. Chem. Phys. 1998, 233, 117.
15. Hess, S. T., Huang S.; Heikal, A. A.; Webb, W. W. Biochemistry 2002, 41, 697.
16. Eggeling, C.; Fries, J. R.; Brand, L.; Gunther, R.; Seidel, C. A. M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1998, 95, 1556.
17. Liedberg, B.; Nylander, C.; Lundstrom, I. Sens. Actuators 1983, 4, 299.
18. Kasper, M.; Busche, S.; Dieterle, F.; Belge, G.; Gauglitz, G. Meas. Sci. Technol. 2004, 15, 540.
19. Volkmer, A. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2005, 38, R59.
20. Zumbusch, A.; Holtom, G. R.; Xie, X. S. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1999, 82, 4142.
21. Mawatari, K.; Kitamori, T.; Sawada, T. Anal. Chem. 1998, 70, 5037.
22. Berciaud, S.; Cognet, L.; Blab, G. A.; Lounis, B. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 9525, 7402.
23. Boyer, D.; Tamarat, P.; Maali, A.; Lounis, B.; Orrit, M. Science 2002, 297, 1160.
24. Cognet, L.; Tardin, C.; Boyer, D.; Choquet, D.; Tamarat, P.; Lounis, B. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2003, 100, 11350.
25. Kwiat, P.; Weinfurter, H.; Herzog, T.; Zeilinger, A.; Kasevich, M. A. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1995, 74, 4763.
26. Kwiat, P. G.; White, A. G.; Mitchell, J. R.; Nairz, O.; Weihs, G.; Weinfurter, H.; Zeilinger, A. Phys. Revi. Lett. 1999, 83, 4725.
27. Wallace, K.; Hardy, G.; Serabyn, E. Nature 2000, 406, 700.
28. Serabyn, E.; Wallace, J. K.; Hardy, G. J.; Schmidtlin, E. G. H.; Nguyen, H. T. Appl. Opt. 1999, 38, 7128.
29. Serabyn, E.; Colavita, M. M. Appl. Opt. 2001, 40, 1668.
30. Fromme, P.; Witt, H. T. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1998, 1365, 175.
31. The most sensitive region of a beam quadrant with respect to refractive index changes is very close to the focus of the microscope objectives. This is the region where the beam quadrants just can be optically separated, considering the diffraction limit of about 200 nm. The region is determined by a complicated three-dimensional optical transfer function defined by the numerical apertures of the objectives and the position of the detection fiber. In total, eight such regions are present for each of the four beam quadrants, one in front of and one after the focus.
32. 0 = 200 nm. Note that this calculation neglects effects due to absorption or scattering.