Clinical evaluation of the use of fiber posts and direct resin restorations for endodontically treated teeth

International Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 399-404

  Grandini, Simone ^a   Goracci, Cecilia ^a   Tay, Franklin R ^a,b   Grandini, Romano ^c   Ferrari, Marco ^a,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SIENA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FLORENCE   (Italy)

^d University of Florence ^*  (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 26444593249     PISSN: 08932174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Bradley JS, Hastings GW, Johnson-Nurse C. Carbon fibre-reinforced epoxy as a high strength, low modulus material for internal fixation plates. Biomaterials 1980;1:38-40.
2. Duret B, Reynaud M, Duret F. Un nouveau concept de reconstitution corono-radiculaire: Le composiposte (1). Chir Dent France 1990;540:131-141.
3. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A, Heitmann T. Stiffness, elastic limit, and strength of newer types of endodontic posts. J Dent 1999;27:275-278.
4. Fredriksson M, Astback J, Pamenius M, et al. A retrospective study on 236 patients with teeth restored by carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:151-157.
5. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Mannocci F, Mason PN. Retrospective study of clinical performance of fiber posts. Am J Dent 2000;13:9B-14B.
6. Ferrari M, Vichi A, García-Godoy F. A retrospective study of fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts vs. cast posts and cores: A four-year recall. Am J Dent 2000;13:B9-B14.
7. Vichi A, Ferrari M, Davidson CL. Influence of ceramic and cement thickness on the masking of various types of opaque posts. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;83:412-417.
8. Drummond JL, Toepke RS, King TJ. Thermal and cycling loading of endodontic posts. Eur J Oral Sci 1999;107:220-224.
9. Nakabayashi N, Pashley DH. Hybridization of Dental Hard Tissue. Berlin: Quintessence, 1998.
10. Chappel RP, Cobb CM, Spencer P. Dentinal tubule anastomosis: A potential factor in adhesive bonding? J Prosthet Dent 1994;72:183-188.
11. Mjör IA, Nordhal I. The density and branching of dentinal tubules in human teeth. Arch Oral Biol 1996;41:401-412.
12. Ferrari M, Mannocci F, Vichi A, Cagidiaco MC, Mjör IA. Bonding to root canal: Structural characteristics of the substrate. Am J Dent 2000;13:380-386.
13. Vichi A Grandini S, Ferrari M. Comparison between two clinical procedures for bonding fiber posts into a root canal: A microscopic investigation. J Endod 2002;28:355-360.
14. Gateau P, Sabek M, Dailey B. Fatigue testing and microscopic evaluation of post and core restorations under artificial crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:341-347.
15. Cohen BI, Pagnillo MK, Condos S, Deutsch AS. Four different core materials measured for fracture strength in combination with five different designs of endodontic posts. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76:487-495.
16. Freedman GA. Esthetic post and core treatment. Dent Clin North Am 2001;45:103-116.
17. Dietschi D, Romelli M, Goretti A. Adaptation of adhesive posts and cores to dentin after fatigue testing. Int J Prosthodont 1997;10:498-507.
18. Monticelli F, Grandini S, Goracci C, Ferrari M. Clinical behavior of translucent-fiber posts: A 2-year prospective study. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:593-596.
19. Creugers NH, Mentink AG, Fokkinga WA, Kreulen CM. A 5-year follow-up of a prospective clinical study on various types of core restorations. Int J Prosthodont 2005;18:34-39.
20. Sorensen JA, Martinoff JT. Intracoronal reinforcement and coronal coverage: A study of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1984;51:780-784.
21. Paul S, Scharer P. Post and core reconstruction for fixed prosthodontic restoration. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1998;5:513-520.
22. Fuss Z, Lustig J, Katz A, Tamse A. An evaluation of endodontically treated vertical root fractured teeth: Impact of operative procedures. J Endod 2001;27:46-48.
23. Aquilino SA, Caplan DJ. Relationship between crown placement and the survival of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 2002r;87:256-263.
24. Newman MP, Yaman P, Dennison J, Rafter M, Billy E. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with composite posts. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:360-367.
25. Hassan K, Mante F, List G, Dhuru V. A modified incremental filling technique for Class II composite restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1987;58:153-156.
26. Bichacho N. The centripetal build-up for composite resin posterior restorations. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1994;6:17-23; quiz 24.
27. Ausiello P, De Gee AJ, Rengo S, Davidson CL. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars adhesively restored. Am J Dent 1997;10:237-241.
28. Yamada Y, Tsubota Y, Fukushima S. Effect of restoration method on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:94-98.
29. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Grandini S, Goracci C. Efficacy of a self-curing adhesive/resin cement system on luting glass-fibre posts into root canals: An SEM investigation. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:543-549.
30. Tay FR, Gwinnett AJ, Pang KM, Wei SHY. Micromorphologic relationship of the resin-dentine interface following a total-etch technique in vivo using a dentinal bonding system. Quintessence Int 1995;26:63-70.
31. Baran G, Boberick K, McCool J. Fatigue of restorative materials. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 2001;12:350-360.
32. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Grandini S. Influence of adhesive application technique on efficacy of bonding to root canal walls: An SEM investigation. Dent Mater 2001;17:422-429.
33. Lovdahl PE, Nicholls JI. Pin-retained amalgam cores vs. cast-gold dowel-cores. J Prosthet Dent 1977;38:507-514.
34. Trabert KC, Caputo AA, Abou Rass M. Tooth fracture: A comparison of endodontic and restorative treatments. J Endod 1978;4:341-345.
35. Sorensen JA. Preservation of tooth structure. J Calif Dent Assoc 1988;16:15-22.
36. Gesi A, Magnolfi S, Goracci C, Ferrari M. Comparison of two techniques for removing fiber posts. J Endod 2003;29:580-582.
37. Frankenberger R, Kramer N, Ebert J, et al. Fatigue behavior of the resin-resin bond of partially replaced resin-based composite restoration. Am J Dent 2003;16:17-22.
38. Saunders WP. Effect of fatigue upon the interfacial bond strength of repaired composite resin. J Dent 1990;18:158-162.
39. Yip KH, Smales RJ, Kaidonis JA. Differential wear of teeth and restorative materials: Clinical implications. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:350-356.
40. Derand P, Vereby P. Wear of low-fusing dental porcelains. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:460-463.
41. Hickel R, Heidemann D, Staehle HJ, Minnig P, Wilson NH. Direct composite restorations: Extended use in anterior and posterior situations. Clin Oral Investig 2004;8:43-44.
42. Mjör IA, Gordan VV. Failure, repair, refurbishing and longevity of restorations. Oper Dent 2002;27:528-534.
43. Grandini S, Goracci C, Monticeli F, Tay FR, Ferrari M. Fatigue resistance and structural characteristics of fiber posts: Three-point bending test and SEM evaluation. Dent Mater 2005;Feb;21:75-82.