Recommendations of the French Society of Vascular Medicine for Screening and Surveillance of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms;Recommandations de la Société Française de Médecine Vasculaire pour le Dépistage et la Surveillance des Anévrysmes de l'Aorte Abdominale

Journal des Maladies Vasculaires

Volumn 30, Issue 4 III, 2005, Pages

  Becker, F ^a   Baud, J M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE FRANCHE COMTÉ   (France)

^b SFMV   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL AORTA ANEURYSM; CONFERENCE PAPER; ECHOGRAPHY; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; IMAGING; PREVALENCE; RISK FACTOR; SCREENING;

AGED; AORTIC ANEURYSM, ABDOMINAL; AORTIC RUPTURE; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FRANCE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; RISK FACTORS; SOCIETIES, MEDICAL;

EID: 26444577557     PISSN: 03980499     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (65)

1. KENT KC, ZWOLAK RM, JAFF MR et al. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: a consensus statement. J Vasc Surg, 2004; 39: 267-9.
2. Suggested standards for reporting on arterial aneurysms. Subcommittee on reporting standards for arterial aneurysms, ad hoc committee on reporting standards, Society for Vascular Surgery and North American chapter, International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery. J Vasc Surg, 1991; 13: 444-50.
3. LUCARROTTI ME, SHAW E, HEATHER BP. Distribution of aortic diameter in a screened male population. Br J Surg, 1992; 79: 641-2.
4. GRIMSHAW GM, THOMPSON JM. The abnormal aorta: a statistical definition and strategy for monitoring change. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 1995; 10: 95-100.
5. LEDERLE FA, JOHNSON GR, WILSON SE et al. relationship of age, gender, race, and body size to infrarenal aortic diameter. J Vasc Surg, 1997; 26: 595-601.
6. WILMINK ABM, PLEUMEEKERS HJCM, HOES AW et al. The infrarenal aortic diameter in relation to age: only part of the population in older age groups shows an increase. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 1998; 16: 431-7.
7. LINDHOLT JS, VAMMEN S, JUUL S et al. Optimal interval screening and surveillance of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovas Surg, 2000; 20: 369-73.
8. GRIMSHAW GM, THOMPSON JM. Changes in diameter of the abdominal aorta with age, an epidemiological study. J Clin Ultrasound, 1997; 25: 7-13.
9. LEDERLE FA, WILSON SE, JOHNSON GG et al. Design of the abdominal aortic Aneurysm Detection and Management Study (ADAM Study). J Vasc Surg, 1994; 20: 296-303.
10. HOLDSWORTH RJ, SHEARER C. Comparison of antero-posterior and transverse aortic diameters: implications for routine aneurysm surveillance. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2004; 27: 100-2.
11. SPROUSSE LR, MEIER GH, PARENT FN et al. Is ultrasound more accurate than axial computed tomography for determination of maximal abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter. Eur J Vasc Endovasc, 2004; 28: 28-35.
12. MALONEY JD, PAIROLERO PC, SMITH SF et al. Ultrasound evaluation of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Circulation, 1977; 56 (3 Suppl.): II80-5.
13. AKKERSDIJK GJ, PUYLAERT JB, COERKAMP EG et al. Accuracy of ultrasonographic measurement of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm. Br J Surg, 1994; 81: 376.
14. SINGH K, JACOBSEN BK, SOLBERG S et al. The difference between ultrasound and computed tomography measurements of aortic diameter increases with aortic diameter: analysis of axial images of abdominal aortic and common iliac artery diameter in normal and aneurysmal aortas. The Thromso Study, 1994-1995. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2004; 28: 158-67.
15. WANHAINEN A, BERGQVIST D, BJÖRCK M. Measuring the abdominal aorta with ultrasonography and computed tomography: difference and variability. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2002; 24: 428-34.
16. SPROUSSE LR, MEIER GH, LESAR CJ et al. Comparison of abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter measurements obtained with ultrasound and computed tomography: is there a difference? J Vasc Surg, 2003; 38: 466-72.
17. CAYNE NS, VEITH FJ, LIPSITZ EC et al. Variability of maximal aortic aneurysm diameter measurements on CT scan: significance and methods to minimize. J Vasc Surg, 2004; 39: 811-5.
18. BAUD JM, MAS D, PICHOT O et al. Critères de quantification et de caractérisation des anévrysmes de l'aorte abdominale par l'échographie, Etude AFFCA. J Mal Vasc, 1997; 22: 313-20.
19. VANHAINEN A, BJÖRCK M, BOMAN K, RUTEGARD J, BERGQVIST D. Influence of diagnostic criteria on the prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg, 2001; 34: 229-35.
20. PLEUMEEKERS HJCM, HOES AW, VAN DER DOES E et al. Epidemiology of abdominal aortic aneurysms, Review. Eur J Vasc Surg, 1994; 8: 119-28.
21. WILMINK ABM, QUICK CRG. Epidemiology and potential for prevention of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Br J Surg, 1998; 85: 155-62.
22. BOLL APM, VERBEEK ALM, VAN DE LISDONK EH et al. High prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm in a primary care screening program. Br J Surg, 1998; 85: 1090-4.
23. LEDERLE FA, JOHNSON GR, WILSON SE et al. Prevalence and associations of abdominal aortic aneurysm detected through screening. Ann Intern Med, 1997; 126: 441-9.
24. SINGH K, BONAA KH, JACOBSEN BK et al. Prevalence of and Risk factors for abdominal aortic aneurysm in a population based study, The Tromso Study. Am J Epidemiol, 2001; 154: 236-44.
25. LEDERLE FA, JOHNSON GR, WILSON SE et al. Abdominal aortic aneurysm in women. J Vasc Surg, 2001; 34: 122-6.
26. BLANCHARD JF, ARMENIAN HK, FRIESEN PP. Risk factor for abdominal aortic aneurysm: results of a case-control study. Am J Epidemiol, 2000; 151: 575-83.
27. FLEMING C, WHITLOCK EP, BEIL T et al. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: a best-evidence systematic review for the US preventive services task force. Ann Inter Med, 2005; 142: 203-11.
28. LEDERLE FA, JOHNSON GR, WILSON SE et al. The Aneurysm Detection and Management Study Screening Program. Validation cohort and final results. Arch Intern Med, 2000; 160: 1425-30.
29. VANHAINEN A, BERGQVIST D, BOMAN K et al. Risk factors associated with abdominal aortic aneurysm: a population-based study with historical and current data. J Vasc Surg, 2005; 41: 390-6.
30. KUIVANIEMI H, SHIBAMURA H, ARTHUR C et al. Familial abdominal aortic aneurysm: collection of 233 multiplex families. J Vasc Surg, 2003; 37: 340-5.
31. LIMET R. Le risque familial de l'anévrysme de l'aorte abdominale et ses conséquences pour l'organisation d'un dépistage sélectif. J Mal Vasc, 1995; 20: 285-7.
32. LIMET R, SAKALIHASSAN N, ALBERT A. Determination of the expansion rate and incidence of rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg, 1991; 14: 540-8.
33. The UK Small Aneurysm trial participants. Long-term outcomes of immediate repair compared with surveillance of small abdominal aortic aneurysms. NEJM, 2002; 346: 1445-52.
34. LEDERLE FA, WILSON SE, JOHNSON JR et al. Immediate repair compared with surveillance of small abdominal aortic aneurysms. NEJM, 2002; 346: 1437-44.
35. POWEL JT, GREENHALGH RM. Small abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med, 2003; 348: 1895-901.
36. BREWSTER DC, CRONENWETT JL, HALLETT JW et al. Guidelines for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Report of a subcommittee of the Joint Council of the American Association for Vascular Surgery and Society for Vascular Surgery. J Vasc Surg, 2003; 37: 1106-17.
37. SCKERMERHORN ML, CRONENWETT JL. Decision making in vascular surgery. Philadelphia: WB Sanders Co. 2001.
38. MEHARD WB, HEIKE JP, SICARD GA. High-attenuating crescent in abdominal aortic aneurysm wall at CT: a sign of acute or impending rupture. Radiology, 1994; 192: 359-62.
39. SIEGEL CL, COHAN RH, KOROBKIN M et al. Abdominal aortic aneurysm morphology: CT features in patients with ruptured and non-ruptured aneurysms. Am J Roentgenol, 1994; 163: 1123-9.
40. BRADY AR, THOMPSON SG, FOWKES GR et al. Abdominal aortic aneurysm expansion, risks factors and time intervals for surveillance. Circulation 2004; 110: 16-21.
41. SOLBERG S, SINGH K, WILSGAARD T et al. Increased growth rate of abdominal aortic aneurysms in women. The TromsØ Study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2005; 29: 145-9.
42. BROWN LC, POWELL JT and the UK Small Aneurysm Trial participants. Risk factors for aneurysm rupture in patients kept under ultrasound surveillance. Ann Surg, 1999; 230: 289-97.
43. HEIKKINEN M, SALENIUS JP, AUVINEN O. Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm in a well-defined geographic area. J Vasc Surg, 2002; 36: 291-6.
44. BROWN PM, ZELT DT, SOBOLEV B. The risk of rupture in untreated aneurysms: the impact of size, gender and expansion rate. J Vasc Surg, 2003; 37: 280-4.
45. DARLING RC III, BREWSTET DC, DARLING RC et al. Are familial abdominal aortic aneurysm different? J Vasc Surg, 1989; 10: 39-43.
46. VERLOES A, SAKALIHASAN N, KOULISCHER L et al. Aneurysms of the abdominal aorta: familial and genetics aspect in three hundred thirteen pedigrees. J Vasc Surg, 1995; 10: 39-43.
47. BAIRD PA, SADOVNICK AD, YEE IML et al. Sibling risks of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Lancet 1995; 346: 601-4.
48. STEYERBERG EW, KIEVIT J, DE MOL VAN OTTERLOO et al. Perioperative mortality of elective abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery. A clinical prediction rule based on literature and individual patient data. Arch Intern Med, 1995; 155: 1998-2004.
49. WANHAINEN A, LUNDKVIST J, BERGQVIST D et al. Cost-effectiveness of different screening strategies for abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vas Surg, 2005; 41: 741-51.
50. NORMAN PE, JAMROZIK K, LAWRENCE-BROWN MM, et al. Population based randomised controlled trial on impact of screening on mortality from abdominal aortic aneurysm. BMJ, 2004; 329: 1259-64.
51. LEDERLE FA, SIMEL DL. Does this patient have abdominal aortic aneurysm? JAMA, 1999; 281: 77-82.
52. CHERVU A, CLAGETT GP, VALENTINE RJ et al. Role of physical examination in detection of aortic abdominal aneurysm. Surgery, 1995; 117: 454-7.
53. VENKATASUBRAMANIAM AK, MEHTA T, CHETTER IC et al. The value of abdominal examination in the diagnosis of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2004; 24: 56-60.
54. LINDHOLD J, JUUL S, Fasting H et al. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms: single centre randomised controlled trial. BMJ, 2005; 330: 750-4.
55. CROW P, SHAW E, EARNSHAW JJ et al. A single normal ultrasonographic scan at age 65 years rules out significant aneurysm disease for life in men. Br J Surg, 2001; 88: 941-4.
56. SCOTT RAP, VARDULAKI KA, WALKER NM et al. The long-terme benefits of a single scan for abdominal aortic aneurysm at age 65. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2001; 21: 535-40.
57. NEWMAN AB, ARNOLD AM, BURKE GL et al. Cardiovascular disease and mortality in older adults with small abdominal aortic aneurysms detected by ultrasonography: the Cardiovascular Health Study. Ann Intern Med, 2001; 134: 182-90.
58. BEARD JD. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm. Br J Surg, 2003; 90: 515-6.
59. LINDHOLT JS. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm. Br J Surg, 2001; 88: 625-6.
60. THOMPSON S. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: screening reduces deaths related to aneurysm. BMJ, 2005; 330: 601 (letter).
61. Multicenter aneurysm screening study group. Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study (MASS): Cost effectiveness analysis of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm based on four year results from randomised controlled trial. BMJ, 2005; 325: 1135-42.
62. GREENHALGH RM. Screening men for aortic aneurysm: a national population screening service will be cost-effective. BMJ, 2002; 325: 1123-4.
63. US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: Recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med, 2005; 142: 198-202.
64. VARDULAKI KA, PREVOST TC, WALKER NM et al. Growth rates and risk of rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Br J Surg, 1998; 85: 1674-80.
65. MCCARTHY RJ, SHAW E, WHYMAN MR et al. Recommendations for screening intervals for small aortic aneurysms. Br J Surg, 2003; 90: 821-6.