Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm

British Journal of Surgery

Volumn 88, Issue 5, 2001, Pages 625-626

  Lindholt, J S ^a  

^a VIBORG HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL AORTA ANEURYSM; ANEURYSM RUPTURE; ANEURYSM SURGERY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; ECHOGRAPHY; EDITORIAL; HUMAN; MORTALITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TREATMENT INDICATION;

AORTIC ANEURYSM, ABDOMINAL; AORTIC RUPTURE; HUMANS; MASS SCREENING; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 0035666123     PISSN: 00071323     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2001.01754.x     Document Type: Editorial

References (11)

1. Is screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm acceptable for the population? Selection and recruitment for hospital-based screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm
2. Mass or high-risk screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm
3. The validity of ultrasonographic scanning as screening method for abdominal aortic aneurysm
4. Interval screening and surveillance of abdominal aortic aneurysms
5. Psychological consequences of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm and conservative treatment of small abdominal aortic aneurysms
6. Health service costs and quality of life for early elective surgery or ultrasonographic surveillance for small abdominal aortic aneurysms
7. Yield of repeated screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm after a 4-year interval
8. Mortality results for randomised controlled trial of early elective surgery or ultrasonographic surveillance for small abdominal aortic aneurysms
9. Influence of screening on the incidence of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: 5-Year results of a randomized controlled study