Characterizing diagrams produced by individuals and dyads

Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (Subseries of Lecture Notes in Computer Science)

Volumn 3343, Issue , 2005, Pages 214-226

  Heiser, Julie ^a   Tversky, Barbara ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABSTRACTING; INFORMATION ANALYSIS;

DYADS; VERBAL INSTRUCTIONS;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

EID: 26444543792     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-32255-9_13     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Agrawala, M., Phan, D., Heiser, J., Haymaker, J., Klingner, J., Hanrahan, P., and Tversky, B. (2003). Designing effective step-by-step assembly instructions. SIGGRAPH 2003.
2. Clark, H. and Wilkes-Gibbs, D. (1986). Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition, 22, 1-39.
3. Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Garrod, S. and A. Anderson (1987). Saying what you mean in dialogue: A study in conceptual and semantic co-ordination. Cognition, 27: 181-218.
5. Goldschmidt, G. The dialectics of sketching. Creativity Research Journal, Vol. 4, No 2, (1991) pp. 123-143.
6. Hegarty, M. and Sims, V. K. (1994). Individual differences in mental animation during mechanical reasoning. Memory & Cognition, 22, 411-430.
7. th annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society.
8. th annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society.
9. Larkin, J. & Simon, H. (1987). Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science, 11:65-99.
10. Mayer, R. E., & Gallini, J. K. (1990). When is an illustration worth ten thousand words? Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(4), 715-726.
11. Mijksenaar, P. & Westendorp, P. (1999). Open here: the art of instructional design. London: Thames and Hudson.
12. Money, J., and Alexander, D. (1966). Turner's syndrome: further demonstration of the presence of specific cognitional deficiencies. Journal of Medical Genetics, 3, 47-48.
13. Novick, L. and Morse, D.L. (2000). Folding a fish, making a mushrooms: The role of diagrams in executing assembly procedures. Memory & Cognition, 28(7), 1242-1256.
14. Pinker, S. (1990). A theory of graph comprehension. In R. Freedle (Ed.), Artificial intelligence and the future of testing. Pp. 73-126. Hillsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum.
15. Richards, C. (2000). Getting the picture: Diagram design and the information revolution. Information Design Journal, 9(2).
16. Schon, D. A.: The Reflective Practitioner. Basic Books, New York. (1983)
17. Schwartz, D. (1995) The emergence of abstract representations in dyad problem solving. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4, 321-354.
18. Shepard, R. & Cooper, L. (1982). Mental Images and Their Transformations. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press.
19. Suwa, M., Tversky, B. (1997). What do architects and students perceive in their design sketches?: A protocol analysis. Design Studies, 18, 385-403.
20. Tversky, B. (1995). Cognitive origins of graphic conventions. In F. T. Marchese (Ed.). Understanding images, (pp.29-53). New York: Springer-Verlag.
21. Tversky, B. & Lee, P.U. (1999). Pictorial and verbal tools for conveying routes. In C. Freksa, D.M. Mark (eds.) Spatial information theory (pp. 51-64). Berlin: Springer
22. Tversky, B., Zacks, J., Lee, P. U., & Heiser, J. (2000). Lines, blobs, crosses, and arrows: Diagrammatic communication with schematic figures. In M. Anderson, P. Cheng, and V. Haarslev (Editors). Theory and application of diagrams. Pp. 221-230. Berlin: Springer.
23. Vandenburg, S.G. and Kuse, A.R. (1978). Mental rotations. A group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization, Perceptual Motor Skills, 47, 599-604.
24. Wright, P., Lickorish, A., Hull, A., and Ummelen, N. (1995). Graphics in written directions: Appreciated by readers but not by writers. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 9, 41-59.