Hemispheric biases and the control of visuospatial attention: An ERP study

BMC Neuroscience

Volumn 6, Issue , 2005, Pages

  Spencer, Kevin M ^a   Banich, Marie T ^b  

^a VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION FUNCTION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; ERROR; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HEMISPHERE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEFT HEMISPHERE; MALE; PREDICTION; RIGHT HEMISPHERE; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL STIMULATION; ADOLESCENT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EVOKED RESPONSE; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; METHODOLOGY; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; TELENCEPHALON;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; EVOKED POTENTIALS; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; TELENCEPHALON;

EID: 26444467718     PISSN: 14712202     EISSN: 14712202     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2202-6-51     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Levy J, Heller W, Banich MT, Burton LA: Are variations among right-handed individuals caused by characteristic arousal differences between hemispheres? J Exp Psychol: Hum Percept Perform 1983, 9:329-359.
2. Desimone R, Duncan J: Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annu Rev Neurosci 1995, 18:193-222.
3. Posner MI, Petersen SE: The attention system of the human brain. Annu Rev Neurosci 1990, 13:25-42.
4. Arguin M, Lassonde M, Quattrini A, Del Pesce M, Foschi N, Papo I: Divided visuo-spatial attention systems with total and anterior callosotomy. Neuropsychologia 2000, 38:283-291.
5. Luck SJ, Hillyard SA, Mangun GR, Gazzaniga MS: Independent attentional scanning in the separated hemispheres of split-brain patients. J Cog Neurosci 1994, 6:84-91.
6. Corballis PM, Gratton G: Independent control of processing strategies for different conditions in the visual field. Biol Psychol 2003, 64:191-209.
7. Kinsbourne M: Orientational bias model of unilateral neglect: Evidence from attentional gradients within hemispace. In Unilateral Neglect: Clinical and Experimental Studies Edited by: Robertson IH, Marshall JC. Hove, UK, Erlbaum; 1993.
8. Jewell G, McCourt ME: Pseudoneglect: A review and meta-analysis of performance factors in line bisection tasks. Neuropsychologia 2000, 38:93-110.
9. Reuter-Lorenz PA, Kinsbourne M, Moscovitch M: Hemispheric control of spatial attention. Brain Cogn 1990, 12:240-266.
10. Berlucchi G, Aglioti S, Tassinari G: Rightward attentional bias and left hemisphere dominance in a cue-target light detection task in a callosotomy patient. Neuropsychologia 1997, 35:941-952.
11. Corballis MC: Line bisection in a man with complete forebrain commissurotomy. Neuropsychol 1995, 9:147-156.
12. Proverbio AM, Zani A, Gazzaniga MS, Mangun GR: ERP and RT signs of a rightward bias for spatial orienting in a split-brain patient. NeuroReport 1994, 5:2457-2461.
13. Behrmann M, Watt S, Black SE, Barton JJS: Impaired visual search in patients with unilateral neglect: an oculographic analysis. Neuropsychologia 1997, 35:1445-1458.
14. Smania N, Martini MC, Gambina G, Tomelleri G, Palamara A, Natale E, Marzi CA: The spatial distribution of visual attention in hemineglect and extinction patients. Brain 1998, 121:1759-1770.
15. Vuilleumier P, Hester D, Assal G, Regli F: Unilateral spatial neglect recovery after sequential strokes. Neurology 1996, 46:184-189.
16. Oliveri M, Rossini PM, Traversa R, Cicinelli P, Filippi MM, Pasqualetti P, Tomaiuolo F, Caltagirone C: Left frontal transcranial magnetic stimulation reduces contralesional extinction in patients with unilateral right brain damage. Brain 1999, 122:1731-1739.
17. Hilgetag CC, Théoret H, Pascual-Leone A: Enhanced visual spatial attention ipsilateral to rTMS-induced 'virtual lesions' of human parietal cortex. Nat Neurosci 2001, 4:953-957.
18. Kim H, Levine SC: Sources of between-subjects variability in perceptual asymmetries: a meta-analytic review. Neuropsychologia 1991, 29:877-888.
19. Kim H, Levine SC: Variations in characteristic perceptual asymmetry: modality specific and modality general components. Brain Cogn 1992, 19:21-47.
20. Kim H, Levine SC, Kertesz S: Are variations among subjects in lateral asymmetry real individual differences or random error in measurement? Putting variability in its place. Brain Cogn 1990, 14:220-242.
21. Levine SC, Banich MT, Kim H: Variations in arousal asymmetry: implications for face processing. In Duality and Unity of the Brain Edited by: Ottoson O. New York, Plenum Press; 1987.
22. Levine SC, Banich MT, Koch-Weser M: Variations in patterns of lateral asymmetry among dextrals. Brain Cogn 1984, 3:317-334.
23. Kim H, Levine SC: Inferring patterns of hemispheric specialization for individual subjects from laterality data: A two-task criterion. Neuropsychologia 1991, 3:93-105.
24. Eriksen BA, Eriksen CW: Effects of noise letters on the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Percept Psychophys 1974, 16:143-149.
25. Levy J, Heller W, Banich MT, Burton LA: Asymmetry of perception in free viewing of chimeric faces. Brain Cogn 1983, 2:404-419.
26. Berti A, Allport A, Driver J, Dienes Z, Oxbury J, Oxbury S: Levels of processing for visual stimuli in an "extinguished" field. Neuropsychologia 1992, 30:403-415.
27. Fuentes L, Humphreys GW: On the processing of "extinguished" stimuli in unilateral visual neglect: An approach using negative priming. Cog Neuropsychol 1996, 13:111-136.
28. McGlinchey-Berroth R, Milberg WP, Verfaellie M, Grande L, D'Esposito M, Alexander M: Semantic processing and orthographic specificity in hemispatial neglect. J Cog Neurosci 1996, 8:291-304.
29. Volpe BT, Ledoux JE, Gazzaniga MS: Information processing of visual stimuli in an "extinguished" visual field. Nature 1979, 282:722-724.
30. Luck SJ, Woodman GF, Vogel EK: Event-related potential studies of attention. Trends Cog Sci 2000, 4:432-440.
31. Pfefferbaum A, Ford JM, Weller BJ, Kopell BS: ERPs to response production and inhibition. Electroencephal clin Neurophysiol 1985, 71:55-63.
32. Kopp B, Rist F, Mattler U: N200 in the flanker task as a neurobehavioral tool for investigating executive control. Psychophysiol 1996, 33:282-294.
33. Van Veen V, Carter CS: The timing of action-monitoring processes in the anterior cingulate cortex. J Cog Neurosci 2002, 14:593-602.
34. West R: Neural correlates of cognitive control and conflict detection in the Stroop and digit-location tasks. Neuropsychologia 2003, 41:1122-1135.
35. Bartholow BD, Pearson MA, Dickter CL, Sher KJ, Fabiani M, Gratton G: Strategic control and medial frontal negativity: beyond errors and response conflict. Psychophysiol 2005, 42:33-42.
36. Spencer KM, Banich MT: Hemispheric biases in spatial attention. Cognitive Neurosci Soc Abstracts 2000:S96.
37. Pashler H, O'Brien S: Dual-task interference and the cerebral hemispheres. J Exp Psychol: Hum Percept Perform 1993, 19:315-330.
38. Reuter-Lorenz PA, Nozawa G, Gazzaniga MS, Hughes HC: Fate of neglected targets: a chronometric analysis of redundant target effects in the bisected brain. J Exp Psychol: Hum Percept Perform 1995, 21:211-230.
39. Heinze HJ, Luck SJ, Mangun GR, Hillyard SA: Visual event-related potentials index focused attention within bilateral stimulus arrays. I. Evidence for early selection. Electroenceph clin Neurophysiol 1990, 75:511-527.
40. Heller W, Levy J: Perception and expression of emotion in right-handers and left-handers. Neuropsychologia 1981, 19:263-272.
41. Mattingley JB, Bradshaw JL, Phillips JG, Bradshaw JA: Reversed perceptual asymmetry for faces in left unilateral neglect. Brain Cogn 1993, 23:145-165.
42. Oldfield RC: The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971, 9:97-113.
43. Gratton G, Coles MGH, Donchin E: A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. Electroencephal clin Neurophysiol 1983, 75:468-484.