Health plan selection criteria by people with impaired mobility

Medical Care

Volumn 40, Issue 9, 2002, Pages 732-742

  O'Day, Bonnie ^a   Palsbo, Susan E ^a,b   Dhont, Kelley ^a   Scheer, Jessica ^a  

^a NRH Ctr for Hlth/Disability Res   (United States)

^b NRH CHDR   (United States)

Author keywords

CAHPS; Cerebral palsy; Choice; Disability; Multiple sclerosis; Rheumatoid arthritis; Spinal cord injury

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CEREBRAL PALSY; CONSUMER; DECISION MAKING; DISABLED PERSON; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH INSURANCE; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS; SPINAL CORD INJURY; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; AGED; ARTHRITIS, RHEUMATOID; CEREBRAL PALSY; CONSUMER SATISFACTION; DECISION MAKING; DISABLED PERSONS; FEMALE; FOCUS GROUPS; HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY; HEALTH SERVICES NEEDS AND DEMAND; HUMANS; INSURANCE, HEALTH; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; SPINAL CORD INJURIES; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0036719149     PISSN: 00257079     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00005650-200209000-00003     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. US Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2010. Washington DC. January-2000.
2. Schur CL, Berk ML. Choice of Health Plan: Implications for Access and Satisfaction. Health Care Financing Rev 1998;20:29-43.
3. Chakraborty G, Ettenson R, Gaeth G. How consumers choose health insurance. J Health Care Marketing 1994;14:21-33.
4. McLaughlin CG. Health care consumers: choices and constraints. Med Care Res Rev 1999;56(Suppl l):24-29, discussion 60-66.
5. Holmes-Rovner M, Kroll J, Schmitt N, et al. Patient satisfaction with health care decisions: The satisfaction with decision scale. Med Decis Making 1996;16:58-64.
6. Knutson D, Fowles J, Finch M, et al. Employerspecific versus community-wide report cards: Is there a difference? Health Care Financing Rev 1996;18:111-115.
7. Kaye HS, Kang T, LaPlante MP. Mobility device use in the United States. Disability Statistics Report. 2000;(14). Washington, D.C.: US Department of Education, National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research.
8. Dejong G, Batavia A, Griss R. America's neglected health minority: Working age persons with disabilities. Milbank Q 1989;67(Suppl 2):311-351.
9. Bockenek W, Mann N, Lanig I, et al. Primary care for persons with disability. In: DeLisa J, Gans B, eds. Rehabilitation Medicine: Principles and Practice. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven; 1998:905-928.
10. Krueger R. Focus groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1988.
11. O'Day BL, Killeen M. Research on the lives of people with disabilities: The emerging importance of qualitative research methodologies. J Disability Policy Res. In press.
12. Bienecke R, Pfeiffer R, Pfeiffer D, et al. The evaluation of fee-for-service and managed care from the viewpoint of people with disabilities in the USA. Disabil Rehabil 1997;19:515-522.
13. Frieden L, Smith L, Wilkinson W, et al. Spinal cord injury and managed care: A consumer viewpoint. Top Spinal Cord Injury Rehabil 1998;3:80-88.
14. Nud'ist [computer program]. Version 4. Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; 1999.
15. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. CAHPS 2.0 Survey and Reporting Kit, Publication No. AHCPR 99-0039, Rockville, MD; 1999.
16. Crofton C, Lubalin JS, Darby C. Foreword. Med Care 1999;37:MS1-MS9.