Calibration of distance and size does not calibrate shape information: Comparison of dynamic monocular and static and dynamic binocular vision

Ecological Psychology

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 55-74

  Bingham, Geoffrey P ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 26444432247     PISSN: 10407413     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15326969eco1702_1     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bingham, G. P., Bradley, A., Bailey, M., & Vinner, R. (2001). Accommodation, occlusion and disparity matching are used to guide reaching: A comparison of actual versus virtual environments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 1314-1344.
2. Bingham, G. P., Crowell, J. A., & Todd, J. T. (2001, May 6). Distortions of distance and shape do not reflect a single continuous transformation on reach space. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Vision Sciences Society, Sarasota, FL.
3. Bingham, G. P., & Pagano, C. C. (1998). The necessity of a perception/action approach to definite distance perception: Monocular distance perception to guide reaching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 145-168.
4. Bingham, G. P., Zaal, F., Robin, D., & Shull, J. A. (2000). Distortions in definite distance and shape perception as measured by reaching without and with haptic feedback. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1436-1460.
5. Brenner, E., & Van Damme, W. J. M. (1998). Judging distance from ocular convergence. Vision Research, 38, 493-498.
6. Crowell, J. A., Todd, J. T., & Bingham, G. P. (2000, November 19). Distinct visuomotor transformations for visually guided reaching. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, New Orleans, LA.
7. Hochberg, J. (1978). Perception (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
8. Holway, A. H., & Boring, E. G. (1941). Determinants of apparent visual size with distance variant. American Journal of Psychology, 51, 21-37.
9. Iberall, T., Bingham, G. P., & Arbib, M. A. (1986). Opposition space as a structuring concept for the analysis of skilled hand movements. Experimental Brain Research Series 15. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
10. Johnston, E. B. (1991). Systematic distortions of shape from stereopsis. Vision Research, 31, 1351-1360.
11. Mon-Williams, M., & Dijkerman, H. C. (1999). The use of vergence information in the programming of prehension. Experimental Brain Research, 128, 578-582.
12. Mon-Williams, M., & Tresilian, J. R. (1999a). An ordinal role for accommodation in distance perception? Ergonomics, 43, 391-404.
13. Mon-Williams, M., & Tresilian, J. R. (1999b). Some recent studies on the extraretinal contribution to distance perception. Perception, 28, 167-181.
14. Mon-Williams, M., Tresilian, J. R., & Hasking, P. (in press). Reduced cue distance perception: A role for vergence and memory. Perception.
15. Norman, J. F., & Todd, J. T. (1996). The discriminability of local surface structure. Perception, 25, 381-398.
16. Norman, J. F., Todd, J. T., Perotti, V.J., & Tittle, J. S. (1996). The visual perception of three-dimensional length. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 173-186.
17. Owens, D. A., & Liebowitz, H. W. (1980). Accommodation, convergence, and distance perception in low illumination. American Journal of Optometry & Physiological Optics, 57, 540-550.
18. Paulignan, Y., & Jeannerod, M. (1996). Prehension movements. In A. M. Wing, P. Haggard, & J. R. Flanagan (Eds.), Hand and Brain (pp. 265-282). San Diego: Academic.
19. Pedhazur, E. J. (1982). Multiple regression in behavioral research (2nd ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.
20. Todd, J. T., Tittle, J. S., & Norman, J. F. (1995). Distortions of three-dimensional space in the perceptual analysis of motion and stereo. Perception, 24, 75-86.
21. Tresilian, J. R., Mon-Williams, M., & Kelly, B. M. (1999). Increasing confidence in vergence as a cue to distance. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 266, 39-44.
22. Tresilian, J. R., Mon-Williams, M. (2000). Getting the measure of vergence weight in nearness perception. Experimental Brain Research, 132, 362-368.
23. von Hofsten, C. (1976). The role of convergence in visual space perception. Vision Research, 16, 193-198.
24. von Hofsten, C. (1979). Recalibration of the convergence system. Perception, 8, 37-42.
25. Zaal, F. T., & Bootsma, R. J. (1993). Accuracy demands in natural prehension. Human Movement Science, 12, 339-345.