Coupling computer-interpretable guidelines with a drug-database through a web-based system - The PRESGUID project

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

Volumn 4, Issue , 2004, Pages 1-12

  Dufour, Jean Charles ^a   Fieschi, Dominique ^a   Fieschi, Marius ^a  

^a AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONSULTATION; DATA BASE; DRUG INFORMATION; EVALUATION; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; INTERNET; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; ONLINE SYSTEM; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; TREATMENT PLANNING;

EID: 2642579308     PISSN: 14726947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-4-1     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Field MJ, Lohr KN: Clinical Practice Guidelines: Directions for a New Program. IOM Report Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press; 1990.
2. National Guideline Clearinghouse [http://www.guideline.gov]
3. Agence Nationale d'Accréditation et d'Evaluation en Santé [http://www.anaes.fr]
4. Davis DA, Thomson MA, Oxman AD, Haynes RB: Evidence for the effectiveness of CME. A review of 50 randomized controlled trials. JAMA 1992, 268(9):1111-7.
5. Johnston ME, Langton KB, Haynes RB, Mathieu A: Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on clinician performance and patient outcome. A critical appraisal of research. Ann Intern Med 1994, 120(2):135-42.
6. Durieux P, Ravaud P, Dosquet P, Durocher A: [Effectiveness of clinical guideline implementation strategies: systematic review of systematic reviews] fr. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 2000, 24(11):1018-25.
7. Purves IN, Sugden B, Booth N, Sowerby M: The PRODIGY project - the iterative development of the release one model. Proc AMIA Symp 1999:359-63.
8. Seroussi B, Bouaud J, Dreau H, Falcoff H, Riou C, Joubert M, Simon C, Simon G, Venot A: ASTI: a guideline-based drug-ordering system for primary care. Medinfo 2001, 10(Pt 1):528-32.
9. Tierney WM, Overhage JM, McDonald CJ: Computerizing guidelines: factors for success. Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp 1996:459-62.
10. Mikulich VJ, Liu YC, Steinfeldt J, Schriger DL: Implementation of clinical guidelines through an electronic medical record: physician usage, satisfaction and assessment. Int J Med Inf 2001, 63(3):169-78.
11. Loomis GA, Ries JS, Saywell RM Jr, Thakker NR: If electronic medical records are so great, why aren't family physicians using them? J Fam Pract 2002, 51(7):636-41.
12. Fox J, Bury J, Humber M, Rahmanzadeh A, Thomson R: Publets: Clinical Judgement On The Web? Proc AMIA Symp 2001:179-83.
13. Zvarova J, Peleska J, Hanzlicek P, Zvara K: Enhanced care of hypertensive patients using the Internet. Med Inform Internet Med 2002, 27(3):161-8.
14. Vidal Web Site [http://www.vidal.fr]
15. De Clercq PA, Blom JA, Hasman A, Korsten HH: GASTON: an architecture for the acquisition and execution of clinical guideline-application tasks. Med Inform Internet Med 2000, 25(4):247-63.
16. Dufour JC, Fieschi M, Fieschi D, Giorgi R, Gouvernet J: A Platform to Develop and to Improve Effectiveness of Online Computable Guidelines. Stud Health Technol Inform 2003:800-5.
17. Peleg M, Boxwala AA, Ogunyemi O, Zeng Q, Tu S, Lacson R, Bernstam E, Ash N, Mork P, Ohno-Machado L, Shortliffe EH, Greenes RA: GLIF3: the evolution of a guideline representation format. Proc AMIA Symp 2000:645-9.
18. Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine [http://www.cebm.net/]
19. Bates DW, Leape LL, Cullen DJ, Laird N, Petersen LA, Teich JM, Burdick E, Hickey M, Kleefield S, Shea B, Vander Vliet M, Seger DL: Effect of computerized physician order entry and a team intervention on prevention of serious medication errors. JAMA 1998, 280(15):1311-6.
20. Trivedi MH, Kern JK, Marcee A, Grannemann B, Kleiber B, Bettinger T, Altshuler KZ, McClelland A: Development and implementation of computerized clinical guidelines: barriers and solutions. Methods Inf Med 2002, 41(5):435-42.
21. Seroussi B, Bouaud J, Antoine E: ONCODOC: a successful experiment of computer-supported guideline development and implementation in the treatment of breast cancer. Artif Intell Med 2001, 22(1):43-64.
22. Wang D, Peleg M, Bu D, Cantor M, Landesberg G, Lunenfeld E, Tu SW, Kaiser GE, Hripcsak G, Patel VL, Shortliffe EH: GESDOR - A Generic Execution Model for Sharing of Computer-interpretable Clinical Practice Guidelines. Proc AMIA Symp 2003:694-8.
23. Peleg M, Tu S, Bury J, Ciccarese P, Fox J, Greenes RA, Hall R, Johnson PD, Jones N, Kumar A, Miksch S, Quaglini S, Seyfang A, Shortliffe EH, Stefanelli M: Comparing Computer-interpretable Guideline Models: A Case-study Approach. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2003, 10(1):52-68.
24. Hoelzer S, Schweiger RK, Boettcher HA, Tafazzoli AG, Dudeck J: Value of XML in the implementation of clinical practice guidelines - the issue of content retrieval and presentation. Med Inform Internet Med 2001, 26(2):131-46.
25. Rosille D, Laurent F, Burgana A: Modelling of a case-based retrieval system for oncology. Proc MIE 2003:565-70.
26. Vesely A, Zvárová J, Peleska J, Tomeèková M: On Direct Comparing of Medical Guidelines with Electronic Health Record. Proc MIE 2003. poster exhibition
27. Johnson PD, Tu SW, Musen MA, Purves I: A virtual medical record for guideline-based decision support. Proc AMIA Symp 2001:294-8.
28. Wang D, Peleg M, Tu SW, Boxwala AA, Greenes RA, Patel VL, Shortliffe EH: Representation primitives, process models and patient data in computer-interpretable clinical practice guidelines: A literature review of guideline representation models. Int J Med Inf 2002, 68(1-3):59-70.
29. Peleg M, Ogunyemi O, Tu S, Boxwala AA, Zeng Q, Greenes RA, Shortliffe EH: Using features of Arden Syntax with object-oriented medical data models for guideline modeling. Proc AMIA Symp 2001:523-7.
30. Dubey AK, Chueh HC: An XML-based format for guideline interchange and execution. Proc AMIA Symp 2000:205-9.
31. Shiffman RN, Karras BT, Agrawal A, Chen R, Marenco L, Nath S: GEM: a proposal for a more comprehensive guideline document model using XML. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2000, 7(5):488-98.
32. Scapin DL, Bastien JMC: Ergonomic criteria for evaluating the ergonomic quality of interactive systems. Behav Inf Technol 1997, 16:220-31.