Phylogenetic relationships of neotomine-peromyscine rodents: Based on DNA sequences from the mitochondrial cytochrome-b gene

Journal of Mammalogy

Volumn 85, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 389-395

  Bradley, Robert D ^a   Edwards, Cody W ^a,c   Carroll, Darin S ^a,d   Kilpatrick, C William ^b  

^a TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT   (United States)

^c STEPHEN F AUSTIN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION   (United States)

Author keywords

Baiomyini; Cytochrome b sequences; Neotomini; Peromyscini; Phylogenetics; Tylomyini

Indexed keywords

DNA; MAMMAL; MITOCHONDRIAL DNA; PHYLOGENETICS; RODENT;

BAIOMYS; CRICETINAE; HODOMYS; MAMMALIA; MEGADONTOMYS; NEOTOMA; NYCTOMYS; OCHROTOMYS; ONYCHOMYS; OSGOODOMYS; OTOTYLOMYS; PEROMYSCUS; REITHRODONTOMYS; RODENTIA; SCOTINOMYS; TYLOMYS; XENOMYS;

EID: 2642542628     PISSN: 00222372     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1644/BER-026     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. ANIMAL CARE AND USE COMMITTEE. 1998. Guidelines for the capture, handling, and care of mammals as approved by the American Society of Mammalogists. Journal of Mammalogy 79:1416-1431.
2. BREMER, K. 1994. Branch support and tree stability. Cladistics 10:295-304.
3. BROMBERG, C. H., ET AL. 1995. Sequencher. Gene Codes Corporation, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
4. CARLETON, M. D. 1980. Phylogentic relationships in neotomine-peromyscine rodents (Muridae) and a reappraisal of the dichotomy within New World cricetinae. Miscellaneous Publications, Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan 157:1-146.
5. CARLETON, M. D. 1989. Systematics and evolution. Pp. 7-142 in Advances in the study of Peromyscus. (G. L. Kirkland, Jr., and J. N. Layne, eds.). Texas Tech University Press, Lubbock.
6. CARLETON, M. D., E. T. HOOPER, AND J. HONACKI. 1975. Karyotypes and accessory reproductive glands in the rodent genus Scotinomys. Journal of Mammalogy 56:916-921.
7. CHALINE, J. P. Mein, AND F. PETTER. 1977. Les grandes lignes d'une classification évolutive des Muroidea. Mammalia 41:245-252.
8. EDWARDS, C. W., AND R. D. BRADLEY. 2002. Molecular systematics of the genus Neotoma. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 25:489-500.
9. EDWARDS, C. W., C. F. FULHORST, AND R. D. BRADLEY. 2001. Molecular phylogenetics of the Neotoma albigula species group: further evidence of a paraphyletic assemblage. Journal of Mammalogy 82:267-279.
10. ELLERMAN, J. R. 1940. The families and genera of living rodents. Vol. 1. Rodents other than Muridae. British Museum of Natural History, London, United Kingdom.
11. ENGEL, S. R., K. M. HOGAN, J. F. TAYLOR, AND S. K. DAVIS. 1998. Molecular systematics and paleobiogeography of the South American sigmodontine rodents. Molecular Biology and Evolution 15:35-49.
12. ENGSTROM, M. D., AND J. W. BICKHAM. 1982. Chromosome banding and phylogenetics of the golden mouse, Ochrotomys nuttalli. Genetica 59:119-126.
13. ERIKSSON, T. 1997. Autodecay 3.03. Botaniska Institution, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
14. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783-791.
15. GOLDMAN, E. A. 1910. Revision of the wood rats of the genus Neotoma. North American Fauna 31:1-124.
16. HAIDUK, M. W., C. SANCHEZ-HERNANDEZ, AND R. J. BAKER. 1988. Phylogenetic relationships of Nyctomys and Xenomys to other cricetine genera based on data from G-banded chromosomes. Southwestern Naturalist 33:397-403.
17. HERSHKOVITZ, P. 1962. Evolution of neotropical cricetine rodents (Muridae), with special reference to the phyllotine group. Fieldiana Zoologica 46:1-524.
18. HOOPER, E. T. 1960. The glans penis in Neotoma (Rodentia) and allied genera. Occasional Papers of the Museum of Zoology, University Michigan 618:1-20.
19. HOOPER, E. T., AND G. G. MUSSER. 1964a. The glans penis in neotropical cricitines (family Muridae) with comments on classification of muroid rodents. Miscellaneous Publications, Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan 123:1-57.
20. HOOPER, E. T., AND G. G. MUSSER. 1964b. Notes on classification of the rodent genus Peromyscus. Occasional Publications of the Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan 635:1-13.
21. HUELSENBECK, J. P., AND F. R. RONQUIST. 2001. MrBayes: Bayesian inference for phylogeny. Biometrics 17:754-756.
22. IRWIN, D. M., T. D. KOCHER, AND A. C. WILSON. 1991. Evolution of the cytochrome b gene in mammals. Journal of Molecular Evolution 2:37-55.
23. MADDISON, W. P., AND D. R. MADDISON. 1992. MacClade 3.04. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Publishers, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
24. MCKENNA, M. C., AND S. K. BELL. 1997. Classification of mammals above the species level. Columbia University Press, New York.
25. MILLER, G. S., AND J. W. GRIDLEY. 1918. Synopsis of the supergeneric groups of rodents. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences 8:431-448.
26. MUSSER, G. G., AND M. D. CARLETON. 1993. Family Muridae. Pp. 501-755 in Mammal species of the world: a taxonomic and geographic reference. 2nd ed. (D. E. Wilson and D. M. Reeder, eds.). Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C.
27. PACKARD, R. L. 1960. Speciation and evolution of the pygmy mice, genus Baiomys. University of Kansas Publication, Museum of Natural History 9:579-670.
28. PEPPERS, L. L., AND R. D. BRADLEY. 2000. Cryptic speciation in Sigmodon hispidus: evidence from DNA sequences. Journal of Mammalogy 81:332-343.
29. POSADA, D., AND K. A. CRANDALL. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817-818.
30. REIG, O. A. 1984. Distribução geográphica e história evolutiva dos reodores muroides sulamericanos (Cricetidae: Sigmodontidae). Revista Brasileira de Genetica 7:333-365.
31. RINKER, G. C. 1954. The comparative myology of the mammalian genera Sigmodon, Oryzomys, Neotoma, and Peromyscus (Cricetinae), with remarks on their intergeneric relationships. Miscellaneous Publications, Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan 83:1-124.
32. SAIKI, R. K., ET AL. 1988. Primer-directed enzymatic amplification of DNA with a thermostable DNA polymerase. Science 239:487-491.
33. SHIMODAIRA, H., AND M. HASEGAWA. 1999. Multiple comparisons of log-likelihoods with applications to phylogenetic inference. Molecular Biology and Evolution 16:114-116.
34. SIMPSON, G. G. 1945. The principles of classification and a classification of mammals. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 85:1-350.
35. SMITH, M. F., AND J. L. PATTON. 1993. The diversification of South American rodents: evidence from mitochondrial sequence data for the akodontine tribe. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 50:149-177.
36. SMITH, M. F., AND J. L. PATTON. 1999. Phylogenetic relationships and the radiation of sigmodontine rodents in South America: evidence from cytochrome b. Journal of Mammalian Evolution 6:89-128.
37. SULLIVAN, J., J. A. MARKERT, AND C. W. KILPATRICK. 1997. Phylogeography and molecular systematics of the Peromyscus aztecus species group (Rodentia: Muridae) inferred using parsimony and likelihood. Systematic Biology 46:426-440.
38. SWOFFORD, D. L. 2002. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), Version 4.0b10. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Publishers, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
39. THOMAS, O. 1896. On the genera of rodents: an attempt to bring up to date the current arrangement of the order. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1896:1012-1028.
40. TULLBERG, T. 1899. Ueber das System der Nagethiere, eine phylogenetische Studie. Acta Societatis Medicorum. Upsaliensis 3:1-514.
41. VOSS, R. S., AND A. V. LINZEY. 1981. Comparative gross morphology of male accessory glands among neotropical Muridae (Mammalia: Rodentia) with comments on systematic implications. Miscellaneous Publications, Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan 159:1-41.
42. YANG, Z., N. GOLDMAN, AND A. FRIDAY. 1995. Maximum likelihood trees from DNA sequences: a peculiar statistical estimation problem. Systematic Biology 44:384-399.