Light and heavy reflexives

Linguistics

Volumn 42, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 573-615

  Smith, Mark ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2642515833     PISSN: 00243949     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/ling.2004.019     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Anagnostopoulou, Elena; and Everaert, Martin (1999). Towards a more complete typology of anaphoric expressions. Linguistic Inquiry 30, 97-119.
2. Baker, Carl (1995). Contrast, discourse prominence, and intensification, with special reference to locally free reflexives in British English. Language 71, 63-101.
3. Banfield, Anne (1982). Unspeakable Sentences. London: Routledge.
4. Bosch, Peter (1983). Agreement and Anaphora: a Study of the Role of Pronouns in Syntax and Discourse. London: Academic Press.
5. Brame, Michael (1983). Bound anaphora is not a relation between NPs: evidence for local word grammar (without trees). Linguistic Analysis 11, 139-166.
6. Burzio, Luigi (1989). On the non-existence of disjoint reference principles. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 14, 3-27.
7. Cantrall, William (1974). Viewpoint, Reflexives and the Nature of Noun Phrases. The Hague: Mouton.
8. Chomsky, Noam (1970). Remarks on nominalization. In Readings in English Transformational Grammar, Roderick Jacobs and Peter Rosenbaum, (eds.), 11-61. Waltham, MA: Ginn.
9. _(1981). Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
10. _(1986). Knowledge of Language. New York: Praeger.
11. Culicover, Peter (1997). Principles and Parameters: An Introduction to Syntactic Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12. Di Sciullo, Anna Maria (1996). Word internal pronouns and reflexives. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 10, 103-123.
13. Dowty, David (1980). Comments on the paper by Bach and Partee. In Papers from the Parasession on Pronouns and Anaphora, Jody Kreiman and Almerindo Oteda (eds.), 29-40. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
14. Everaert, Martin (1986). The Syntax of Reflexivisation. Dordrecht: Foris.
15. _(1991). Contextual determination of the anaphor/pronominal distinction. In Long-distance Anaphora, Jan Koster and Eric Reuland (eds.), 77-118. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Faltz, Leonard (1985). Reflexivisation: A Study in Universal Syntax. New York: Garland.
17. Farr, James (1905). Intensives and Reflexives in Anglo-Saxon and Early Middle English. Baltimore: Furst.
18. Fiengo, Robert; and Higginbotham, James (1981). Opacity in NP. Linguistic Analysis 7, 395-422.
19. Fretheim, Thorstein (1984). Norwegian EGEN ("own") - determiner or adjective? Working Papers in Linguistics 2, University of Trondheim.
20. Garcia, Erica (1995). What "reflexivity" is really like. Linguistics 33, 1-52.
21. Geniusiene, Emma (1987). The Typology of Reflexives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
22. Giorgi, Alessandra (1987). The notion of complete functional complex: some evidence from Italian. Linguistic Inquiry 18, 511-518.
23. Grimshaw, Jane (1990). Argument Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24. Haegemann, Liliane (1994). Introduction to Government and Binding Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
25. Haiman, John (1983). Iconic and economic motivation. Language 39, 781-819.
26. Hellan, Lars (1988). Anaphora in Norwegian and the Theory of Grammar. Dordrecht: Foris.
27. Higginbotham, James (1985). On semantics. Linguistic Inquiry 16, 547-593.
28. Huang, Yan (2000). Anaphora: A Cross-Linguistic Study. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29. Jackendoff, Ray (1987). The status of thematic relations in linguistic theory. Linguistic Inquiry 18, 369-411.
30. Jespersen, Otto (1924). The Philosophy of Grammar. London: Allen & Unwin.
31. _(1933). Essentials of English Grammar. London: Allen & Unwin.
32. Katagiri, Yasu (1991). Perspectivity and the Japanese reflexive "zibun". In Situation theory and its applications, vol. 2, Jon Barwise, Jean M. Gawron, Gordon Plotkin, and Syun Tutiya (eds.), 425-447. Stanford, CA: CSLI.
33. Keenan, Edward (2002). Explaining the creation of reflexive pronouns in English. In Studies in the history of English, Donka Minkova and Robert Stockwell (eds.), 325-355. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
34. _(2003). An historical explanation of some binding theoretic facts in English. In The Nature of Explanation in Linguistic Theory, John Moore and Maria Polinsky (eds.), 212-256. Stanford, CA: CSLI.
35. Kemmer, Suzanne (1993). The Middle Voice. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
36. König, Ekkehard; and Peter Siemund (1998). Intensifiers and reflexives: a typological perspective. In Reflexives: Forms and Functions, Zygmunt Frajzyngier (ed.), 41-74. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
37. _; and Peter Siemund (2000). The development of complex reflexives and intensifiers in English. Diachronica 17, 39-84.
38. Kuno, Susumo (1987). Functional Syntax - Anaphora, Discourse and Empathy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
39. Lebeaux, David (1983). A distributional difference between reciprocals and reflexives. Linguistic Inquiry 14, 723-730.
40. Lees, Robert; and Klima, Edward (1963). Rules for English pronominalisation. Language 39, 17-28.
41. Levinson, Stephen (1991). Pragmatic reduction of the binding conditions revisited. Journal of Linguistics 27, 107-161.
42. Lichtenberk, Frantisek (1985). Multiple uses of reciprocal constructions. Australian Journal of Linguistics 5, 19-41.
43. Lidz, Jeffrey (1995). Morphological reflexive marking: evidence from Kannada. Linguistic Inquiry 26, 705-710.
44. Lødrup, Helge (1999). Inalienables in Norwegian and binding theory. Linguistics 37, 365-388.
45. Maldonado, Ricardo (1992). Middle voice: the case of Spanish 'se' Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, San Diego.
46. Ogura, Michiko (1989). Verbs with the Reflexive Pronoun and Constructions with Self in Old and Early Middle English. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer.
47. Pollard, Carl; and Sag, Ivan A. (1992). Anaphors in English and the scope of binding theory. Linguistic Inquiry 23, 261-303.
48. _; and Sag, Ivan A. (1994). Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
49. Quirk, Randolph; Greenbaum, Sidney; Leech, Geoffrey; and Svartvik, Jan A. (1985). A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
50. Reid, Thomas (2000 [1785]). Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man. Pennsylvania: Penn State University Press.
51. Reinhart, Tanya (1983). Anaphora and Semantic Interpretation. London: Croom Helm.
52. _; and Reuland, Eric (1991). Anaphors and logophors: an argument perspective. In Long distance anaphora, Jan Koster and Eric Reuland (eds.), 283-381. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53. _; and Reuland, Eric (1993). Reflexivity. Linguistic Inquiry 24, 657-720.
54. Reuland, Eric (1998). The fine structure of grammar: anaphoric relations. In Reflexives: Forms and Functions, Zygmunt Frajzyngier (ed.), 1-40. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
55. _; and Reinhart, Tanya (1995). Pronouns, anaphors and case. In Studies in Comparative German Syntax, Hubert Haider, Susan Olsen, and Sten Vikner (eds.), 241-268. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
56. Runner, Jeffrey (1998). BT exempt anaphors: an argument from idiom interpretation. In Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics XVI. Stanford, CA: CSLI.
57. Safir, Ken (1997). Semantic atoms of anaphora. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 14, 545-589.
58. Saxon, Leslie (1991). On one's own: the semantics and pragmatics of reflexives. In Interdisciplinary Approaches to Language: Essays in honour of S.-Y. Kuroda, Roberta Ishihara and Carol Georgopoulos (eds.), 501-517. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
59. Stein, Dieter; and Wright, Susan (1995). Subjectivity and Subjectivisation in Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
60. Timberlake, Alan (1980). Reference conditions on Russian reflexivisation. Language 56, 777-796.
61. Wilkins, Wendy (1988). Thematic structure and reflexivisation. In Syntax and Semantics, vol. 21: Thematic Relations, Wendy Wilkins (ed.), 191-213. New York: Academic Press.
62. Williams, Edwin (1987). Implicit arguments, the binding theory, and control. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 5, 151-180.
63. Zipf, George (1935). The Psychobiology of Language. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
64. Zribi-Hertz, Anne (1989). Anaphor binding and narrative point of view: English reflexive pronouns in sentence and discourse. Language 65, 695-727.
65. _(1995). Emphatic or reflexive? On the endophoric character of French Lui-même and similar complex pronouns. Journal of Linguistics 31, 333-374.