Transformations in a civil discourse public speaking class: Speakers' and listeners' attitude change

Communication Education

Volumn 53, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 174-184

  Gayle, Barbara Mae ^a  

^a Department of Communication Studies

Author keywords

Attitude change; Civil discourse; Public speaking curriculum; Subjective reframing

Indexed keywords

EID: 2642513319     PISSN: 03634523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03634520410001682438     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Arnett, R. C. (2001). Dialogic civility as pragmatic ethical praxis: An interpersonal metaphor for the public domain. Communication Theory, 11, 315-338.
2. Barber, R. B. (1998). A place for us. New York: Hill & Way.
3. Battistoni, R. M. (1997). Service learning as civic learning. In G. Reeher & J. Cammarano (Eds.), Education for citizenship: Ideas and innovations in political learning (pp. 29-43). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
4. Bostrom, R. N. (1990). Listening behavior: Measurement and application. New York: Guilford.
5. Chasin, R., Herzig, M., Roth, S., Chasin, L., Becker, C., & Stains, R., Jr. (1996). From diatribe to dialogue on divisive public issues: Approaches drawn from family therapy. Meditation Quarterly, 13, 323-344. Retrieved November 14, 2001, from http://www.publicconversations.org/Pages/mqtemp.html
6. Dahl, R. (1995). Participation and the problem of civic understanding. In A. Etzioni (Ed.), The rights and the common good: The communitarian perspective. New York: St. Martin's.
7. Ehrlich, T., & Hollander, E. (1999). President's declaration on the civic responsibility of higher education. Providence, RI: Campus Compact.
8. Foss, S. K., & Griffin, C. L. (1995). Beyond persuasion: A proposal for an invitational rhetoric. Communication Monographs, 62, 2-15.
9. Gayle, B. M., Martin, D. M., Mann, S., & Chrouser, L. (2002). Transforming the public speaking classroom: A scholarship of teaching and learning project on civil public discourse. Journal of Northwest Communication, 31, 1-26.
10. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine de Gruyer.
11. Hamilton, M. A. (1997). The phase-interface omnistructure underlying the processing of persuasive messages. In G. A. Barnett & F. J. Boster (Eds.), Progress in communication sciences: Vol. 13. Advances in persuasion (pp. 1-42). Greenwich, CT: Ablex.
12. Langsdorf, L. (2003). Argumentation, conflict, and teaching citizens: Remarks on a theme in recent Dewey scholarship. Argumentation & Advocacy, 39, 214-221.
13. Lynch, D. A., George, D., & Cooper, M. M. (1997). Moments of argument: Agnostic inquiry and confrontational cooperation. College Composition and Communication, 48(1), 65.
14. Magolda, M. B. (2000). Teaching to promote intellectual and personal maturity: Incorporating students' worldviews and identities into the learning process. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
15. Mezirow, J. (2000). Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
16. O'Hair, D., Stewart, R., & Rubenstein, H. (2001). A speaker's guidebook. New York: Bedford/St. Martins.
17. O'Keefe, D. J. (1990). Persuasion: Theory and research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
18. Perry, W. A. (1985). Different worlds in the same classroom: Students' evolution in their vision of knowledge and their expectations of teachers. In M. Gullette (Ed.), On teaching and learning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard-Danforth Center for Teaching and Learning.
19. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1981). Attitudes and persuasion: Classic and contemporary approaches. Dubuque, IA: Wm. C. Brown.
20. Schoem, D., & Hurtado, S. (2001). Intergroup dialogue: Deliberative democracy in school, college, community, and workplace. Anne Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
21. Scott, W. A. (1955). Reliability of content analysis: The case for nominal coding. Public Opinion Quarterly, 19, 321-325.
22. Strauss, A. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge Press.
23. Taylor, E. W. (2000). Analyzing research on transformative learning theory. In J. Mezirow's (Ed.), Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress (pp. 285-328). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.