Comparison of perfusion MRI by flow-sensitive alternating inversion recovery and dynamic susceptibility contrast in rats with permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion

NMR in Biomedicine

Volumn 18, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 390-394

  Hofmeijer, J ^a,b   Schepers, J ^b   van der Worp, H B ^a   Kappelle, L J ^a   Nicolay, K ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^c EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

ASL; DSC MRI; FAIR; Perfusion weighted imaging; Transit delays

Indexed keywords

BLOOD; BRAIN; HEMODYNAMICS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHYSIOLOGY; STATISTICAL METHODS;

ARTERIAL SPIN LABELING (ASL); DYNAMIC SUSCEPTIBILITY CONTRAST MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING (DSC-MRI); FLOW-SENSITIVE ALTERNATING INVERSION RECOVERY (FAIR); PERFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; TRANSIT DELAYS;

NEUROLOGY;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; BRAIN BLOOD FLOW; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; HEMODYNAMIC PARAMETERS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE CEREBRAL ARTERY OCCLUSION; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PERFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RAT; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

ANIMALS; BRAIN; BRAIN ISCHEMIA; BRAIN MAPPING; CEREBROVASCULAR CIRCULATION; INFARCTION, MIDDLE CEREBRAL ARTERY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; RATS; RATS, INBRED F344; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 26244456592     PISSN: 09523480     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/nbm.971     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Wu O, Koroshetz WJ, Ostergaard L, Buonanno FS, Copen WA, Gonzalez RG, Rordorf G, Rosen BR, Schwamm LH, Weisskoff RM, Sorensen AG. Predicting tissue outcome in acute human cerebral ischemia using combined diffusion- and perfusion weighted MR imaging. Stroke 2001; 32: 933-942.
2. Rosen BR, Belliveau JW, Vevea JM, Brady TJ. Perfusion imaging with NMR contrast agents. Magn. Reson. Med. 1990; 14: 249-265.
3. Rempp KA, Brix G, Wenz F, Becker CR, Guckel F, Lorenz WJ. Quantification of regional cerebral blood flow and volume with dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 1994; 193: 637-641.
4. Olah L, Wecker S, Hoehn M. Secondary deterioration of apparent diffusion coefficient after 1-hour transient focal cerebral ischemia in rats. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2000; 20: 1474-1482.
5. Hilger T, Niessen F, Diedenhofen M, Hossmann KA, Hoehn M. Magnetic resonance angiography of thromboembolic stroke in rats: indicator of recanalization probability and tissue survival after recombinant tissue plasminogen activator treatment. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2002; 22: 652-662.
6. Hofmeijer J, Schepers J, Veldhuis WB, Nicolay K, Kappelle LJ, Bar PR, van der Worp HB. Delayed decompressive surgery increases apparent diffusion coefficient and improves peri-infarct perfusion in rats with space-occupying cerebral infarction. Stroke 2004; 35: 1476-1481.
7. 2 during focal cerebral ischemia in the rat studied at 8.5 T. Magn. Reson. Med. 1999; 41: 479-485.
8. Schepers J, Veldhuis WB, Pauw RJ, de Groot JW, van Osch MJP, Nicolay K, van der Sanden BPJ. Comparison of FAIR perfusion kinetics with DSC-MRI and functional histology, in a model of transient ischemia. Magn. Reson. Med. 2004; 51: 312-320.
9. Koizumi J, Yoshida Y, Nakazawa T, Ooneda G. Experimental studies of ischemic brain edema, I: a new experimental model of cerebral embolism in rats in which recirculation can be introduced in the ischemic area. Jpn. J. Stroke 1986; 8: 1-8.
10. Belayev L, Alonso OF, Busto R, Zhao W, Ginsberg MD. Middle cerebral artery occlusion in the rat by intraluminal suture. Neurological and pathological evaluation of an improved model. Stroke 1996; 27: 1616-1622.
11. Haase A, Matthaei D, Bartkowski R, Duhmke E, Leibfritz D. Inversion recovery snapshot FLASH MR imaging. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 1989; 13: 1036-1040.
12. 1 values by SNAP-SHOT-FLASH NMR imaging. J. Magn. Reson. 1992; 96: 608-612.
13. Calamante F, Williams SR, van Bruggen N, Kwong KK, Turner R. A model for quantification of perfusion in pulsed labelling techniques. NMR Biomed. 1996; 9: 79-83.
14. Kluytmans M, van der GJ, Viergever MA. Gray matter and white matter perfusion imaging in patients with severe carotid artery lesions. Radiology 1998; 209: 675-682.
15. Hofmeijer J, Veldhuis WB, Schepers J, Nicolay K, Kappelle LJ, Bar PR, van der Worp HB. The time course of ischemic damage and cerebral perfusion in a rat model of space-occupying cerebral infarction. Brain Res. 2004; 1013: 74-82.
16. Hunsche S, Sauner D, Schreiber WG, Oelkers P, Stoeter P. FAIR and dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced perfusion imaging in healthy subjects and stroke patients. J. Magn. Reson. Imag. 2002; 16: 137-146.
17. Yoneda K, Harada M, Morita N, Nishitani H, Uno M, Matsuda T. Comparison of FAIR technique with different inversion times and post contrast dynamic perfusion MRI in chronic occlusive cerebrovascular disease. Magn. Reson. Imag. 2003; 21: 701-705.
18. Buxton RB, Frank LR, Wong EC, Siewert B, Warach S, Edelman RR. A general kinetic model for quantitative perfusion imaging with arterial spin labeling. Magn. Reson. Med. 1998; 40: 383-396.
19. Perthen JE, Calamante F, Gadian DG, Connelly A. Is quantification of bolus tracking MRI reliable without deconvolution? Magn. Reson. Med. 2002; 47: 61-67.
20. Sidaros K, Andersen IK, Gesmar H, Rostrup E, Larsson HB. Improved perfusion quantification in FAIR imaging by offset correction. Magn. Reson. Med. 2001; 46: 193-197.
21. Schepers J, Garwood M, van der SB, Nicolay K. Improved subtraction by adiabatic FAIR perfusion imaging. Magn. Reson. Med. 2002; 47: 330-336.
22. Wong EC, Buxton RB, Frank LR. Quantitative imaging of perfusion using a single subtraction (QUIPSS and QUIPSS II). Magn. Reson. Med. 1998; 39: 702-708.
23. Wong EC, Buxton RB, Frank LR. Implementation of quantitative perfusion imaging techniques for functional brain mapping using pulsed arterial spin labeling. NMR Biomed. 1997; 10: 237-249.
24. 1 periodic saturation: a method for improving accuracy of quantitative perfusion imaging using pulsed arterial spin labeling. Magn. Reson. Med. 1999; 41: 1246-1254.
25. Yen YF, Field AS, Martin EM, Ari N, Burdette JH, Moody DM, Takahashi AM. Test-retest reproducibility of quantitative CBF measurements using FAIR perfusion MRI and acetazolamide challenge. Magn. Reson. Med. 2002; 47: 921-928.
26. Zaharchuk G, Ledden PJ, Kwong KK, Reese TG, Rosen BR, Wald LL. Multislice perfusion and perfusion territory imaging in humans with separate label and image coils. Magn. Reson. Med. 1999; 41: 1093-1098.
27. Detre JA, Wang J. Technical aspects and utility of fMRI using BOLD and ASL. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2002; 113: 621-634.