Asymmetric regulation of access and price discrimination in telecommunications

Journal of Regulatory Economics

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 327-343

  Peitz, Martin ^a  

^a International University in Germany   (Germany)

Author keywords

Access price; Entry; Interconnection charge; Regulation; Telecommunications; Terminated based price discrimination

Indexed keywords

EID: 26244453499     PISSN: 0922680X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11149-005-3963-1     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Armstrong, M. 1998. "Network Interconnection in Telecommunications. " Economic Journal 108: 545-564.
2. Armstrong, M. 2002. "The Theory of Access Pricing and Interconnection." In Handbook of Telecommunications Economics, edited by M. Cave, S. Majumdar, and I. Vogelsang. Amsterdam: North Holland.
3. Armstrong, M. 2004. "Network Interconnection with Asymmetric Networks and Heterogeneous Calling Patterns." Information Economics and Policy 16: 375-390.
4. Cambini, C., and T. Valletti. 2003. "Network Competition with Price Discrimination: 'Bill-and-Keep' Is not so Bad after All." Economics Letters 81: 205-213.
5. Carter, M., and J. Wright. 1999. "Interconnection in Network Industries." Review of Industrial Organization 14: 1-25.
6. Carter, M., and J. Wright. 2003. "Asymmetric Network Interconnection." Review of Industrial Organization 22: 27-46.
7. De Bijl, P., and M. Peitz. 2002a. "New Competition in Telecommunications Markets: Regulatory Pricing Principles." Ifo-Studien 48 (Special Issue on Spectrum Auctions and Competition in Telecommunications): 27-52.
8. De Bijl, P., and M. Peitz. 2002b. Regulation and Entry into Telecommunications markets. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
9. De Bijl, P., and M. Peitz. 2004. "Dynamic Regulation and Competition in Telecommunications Markets - A Policy Framework." Information Economics and Policy 16: 411-437.
10. European Commission. 2000. "Europe's Liberalised Telecommunication's Market - A Guide to the Rules of the Game." Commission staff working document.
11. Gans, J., and S. King. 2001. "Using 'Bill-and-Keep' Interconnection Arrangements to Soften Network Competition." Economics Letters 71: 413-420
12. Laffont, J., P. Rey, and J. Tirole. 1998a. "Network Competition: I. Overview and Nondiscriminatory Pricing." Rand Journal of Economics 29: 1-37.
13. Laffont, J., P. Rey, and J. Tirole. 1998b. "Network Competition: II. Price Discrimination." Rand Journal of Economics 29: 38-56.
14. Laffont, J., and J. Tirole. 2000. Competition in Telecommunications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. Milgrom, P., and J. Roberts. 1990. "Rationalizability, Learning, and Equilibrium in Games with Strategic Complementarities." Econometrica 58: 1255-1277.
16. Opta. 1999. "Besluit geschil KPN-Enertel [Decision in the Conflict between KPN and Enertel]." OPTA/IBT/99/7686, The Hague.
17. Peitz, M. 2003. "On Access Pricing in Telecoms: Theory and European Practice." Telecommunications Policy 27: 729-740.
18. Peitz, M. 2005. "Asymmetric Access Price Regulation in Telecommunications Markets." European Economic Review 49: 341-358.
19. Valletti, T., and C. Cambini. 2005. "Investments and Network Competition." Rand Journal of Economics. 36(2): 446-468.
20. Vives, X. 1990. "Nash Equilibrium with Strategic Complementarities." Journal of Mathematical Economics 19: 305-321.
21. Vogelsang, I. 2003. "Price Regulation of Access to Telecommunications Networks." Journal of Economic Literature 41: 830-862.