Breech presentation: Infant versus mother;Stuitligging: Kind versus moeder

Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde

Volumn 149, Issue 40, 2005, Pages 2211-2214

  Visser, G H A ^a   Rietberg, C C Th ^b   Oepkes, D ^c   Vandenbussche, F P H A ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^b Vlietland Hospital   (Netherlands)

^c LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BREECH PRESENTATION; CESAREAN SECTION; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; MATERNAL MORBIDITY; NETHERLANDS; PERINATAL DEATH; PLACENTA PREVIA; REVIEW; UTERUS RUPTURE; VAGINAL DELIVERY;

ADULT; BREECH PRESENTATION; CESAREAN SECTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; MATERNAL WELFARE; NETHERLANDS; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY COMPLICATIONS; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; UTERINE RUPTURE;

EID: 26244443958     PISSN: 00282162     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (13)

1. Scherjon SA, Roosmalen J van. Aterme stuitligging: standaard geadviseerde keizersnede uiteindelijk niet veiliger voor het kind. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2005;149:2204-6.
2. Verhoeven ATM, Leeuw JP de, Bruinse HW. Aterme stuitligging: onterechte keus voor de electieve keizersnede als standaardbehandeling vanwege te hoge risico's voor de moeder en haar volgende kinderen. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2005;149:2207-10.
3. Hannah ME, Whyte H, Hannah WJ, Hewson S, Amankwah K, Cheng M, et al. Maternal outcomes at 2 years after planned cesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: the international randomized Term Breech Trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191:917-27.
4. Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, Hodnett ED, Saigal S, Willan AR. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group. Lancet. 2000;356:1375-83.
5. Bingham P, Lilford RJ. Management of the selected term breech presentation: assessment of the risks of selected vaginal delivery versus cesarean section for all cases. Obstet Gynecol. 1987;69:965-78.
6. Rietberg CC, Elferink-Stinkens PM, Brand R, Loon AJ van, Hemel OJ van, Visser GH. Term breech presentation in the Netherlands from 1995 to 1999: mortality and morbidity in relation to the mode of delivery of 33,824 infants. BJOG. 2003;110:604-9.
7. Rietberg CC, Elferink-Stinkens PM, Visser GH. The effect of the Term Breech Trial on medical intervention behaviour and neonatal outcome in the Netherlands: an analysis of 35,453 term breech infants. BJOG. 2005;112:205-9.
8. Rietberg CC, Visser GH. Authors' response to Vandenbussche and Oepkes' comment [correspondence]. BJOG. 2005;112:1164.
9. Vandenbussche FP, Oepkes D. The effect of the Term Breech Trial on medical intervention behaviour and neonatal outcome in the Netherlands: an analysis of 35,453 term breech infants [correspondence]. BJOG. 2005;112:1163.
10. Hall MM. Caesarean section. In: Lewis G, editor. Why mothers die 1997-1999. The confidential enquiries into maternal deaths in the United Kingdom. Ch 22. Londen: RCOG press; 2001.
11. Lewis G. Introduction and key findings 2000-2002. In: Lewis G, editor. Why mothers die 2000-2002. The confidential enquiries into maternal deaths in the United Kingdom. Ch 1. Londen: RCOG press; 2004.
12. Allen VM, O'Connell CM, Liston RM, Baskett TF. Maternal morbidity associated with cesarean delivery without labor compared with spontaneous onset of labor at term. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102:477-82.
13. Kwee A. Caesarean section in the Netherlands. Policy, prevention and long term consequences [proefschrift]. Utrecht [ter perse].