Ethics, law, and information technology: The transformative role of rhetoric

Social Science Computer Review

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 283-292

  O'Connell, Brian M ^a  

^a CENTRAL CONNECTICUT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Censorship; Computer law; Information technology; Privacy; Rhetoric

Indexed keywords

EID: 26044471182     PISSN: 08944393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/089443939801600305     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Bacon, F. (1625). The essays or counsels, civil and moral, of Francis Ld. Verulam. Mount Vernon, NY: Peter Pauper Press.
2. Bellah, R. (1982). Social science as practical reason. Hastings Center Report, 12(5), 32-39.
3. Corbett, E. (1965). Classical rhetoric for the modern student. New York: Oxford University Press.
4. Ellul, J. (1964). The technological society. New York: Vintage.
5. Gadamer, H. (1996). The enigma of health. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
6. Goldberg, S. (1994). Culture clash: Law and science in America. New York: New York University Press.
7. Golden, J., & Corbett, E. (1990). The rhetoric of Blair, Campbell, and Whately. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
8. Goldstein, P. (1994). Copyright's highway. New York: Hill & Wang.
9. Heim, M. (1993). The metaphysics of virtual reality. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
10. Holton, G. (1993). Science and anti-science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11. humdog. (1996). Pandora's vox. In P. Ludlow (Ed.), High noon on the electronic frontier (pp. 437-444). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Jonas, H. (1979). Toward a philosophy of technology. Hastings Center Report, 9(1), 34-43.
13. Kuhn, T. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14. Kurtz, L. (1996). Copyright and the national information infrastructure in the United States. European Intellectual Property Review, 3, 120-126.
15. Lyman, P. (1996). What is a digital library? Daedalus, 125(4), 1-33.
16. Marcel, G. (1956). The philosophy of existentialism. Secaucus, NJ: Citadel.
17. Marx, L. (1994). The idea of "technology" and postmodern pessimism. In M. Smith & L. Marx (Eds.), Does technology drive history? (pp. 237-257). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. Mumford, L. (1952). Art and technics. New York: Columbia University Press.
19. Radin, M. (1993). Reinterpreting property. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20. Smith, M. (1994). Technological determinism in American culture. In M. Smith & L. Marx (Eds.), Does technology drive history? (pp. 1-35). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21. Starr, J., & Collier, J. (1989). Dialogues in legal anthropology. In J. Starr & J. Collier (Eds.), History and power in the study of law (pp. 1-28). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
22. Winokur, J. (Ed.). (1987). The portable curmudgeon. New York: NAL Books.
23. Winner, L. (1977). Autonmonous technology: Technics-out-of-control as a theme in political thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.