Normal values for Octopus tendency oriented perimetry in children 7 through 13 years old

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology

Volumn 243, Issue 9, 2005, Pages 886-893

  Brown, Sandra M ^a,c   Bradley, Jay C ^a   Monhart, Matthias J ^b   Baker, Deborah K ^a  

^a TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Interzeag AG   (Switzerland)

^c NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Child; Perimetry; Visual field

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; AGE; ARTICLE; CHILD; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; NORMAL VALUE; PERIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STEREOSCOPIC VISION; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL FIELD;

ADOLESCENT; AGING; CHILD; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PERIMETRY; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REFERENCE VALUES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 25844521040     PISSN: 0721832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00417-005-1134-9     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Barnard NA (1989) Kinetic outline perimetry as a technique for examining the visual fields of young children (letter). Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 9:463-464
2. Bengtsson B, Heijl A (1998) SITA Fast, a new rapid perimetric threshold test: Description of methods and evaluation in patients with manifest and suspect glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 76:431-437
3. Bengtsson B, Olsson J, Heijl A, Rootzen H (1997) A new generation of algorithms for computerized threshold perimetry, SITA. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 75:368-375
4. Brown SM, Morales J (2005) Short automated static perimetry in children with ocular abnormalities. Perimetry Update (in press)
5. Donahue SP, Porter A (2001) SITA visual field testing in children. J AAPOS 5:114-117
6. González de la Rosa M, Bron A, Morales J, Sponsel WE (1996) TOP perimetry: A theoretical evaluation (JERMOV abstract). Vision Res 36:88
7. Gonzales de la Rosa MG, Pinero AM, Hernandez MG (1999) Reproducibility of the TOP algorithm results versus those obtained with the bracketing procedure. Perimetry Update 52-58
8. Kremer I, Nissenkorn I, Lusky M, Yassur Y (1995) Late visual field changes following cryotherapy for retinopathy of prematurity stage 3. Br J Ophthalmol 79:267-269
9. Martinez A, Pareja A, Mantolan C, Sanchez M, Cordoves L, González de la Rosa M (1996) Results of tendency oriented perimetry (TOP) in a normal population. Vision Res 36:153 (JERMOV abstract)
10. Martinez Piñero A, Rodriguez J, Serrano M, González de la Rosa M (1998) Reproducibility and accuracy of tendency oriented perimetry (TOP). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 39:S23 (ARVO abstract #95)
11. Mojon DS, Zulauf M (2003) Normal values of short-wavelength automated perimetry. Ophthalmologica 217:260-264
12. Morales J, Brown SM (2001) The feasibility of short automated static perimetry in children. Ophthalmology 108:157-162
13. Morales J, Weitzman ML, Gonzalez de la Rosa M (2000) Comparison between tendency oriented perimetry (TOP) and Octopus threshold perimetry. Ophthalmology 107:134-142
14. Mutlukan E, Damato BE (1993) Computerised perimetry with moving and steady fixation in children. Eye 7:554-561
15. Pareja Rios A, Arteaga Hernandez V, Gonazlez Hernandez M, Gonzalez de la Rosa M (2000) Efecto del uso de estímulos acústicos en perimetría III. Arch Soc Canar Oftalmol 11:83-86
16. Quinn GE, Fea AM, Minguini N (1991) Visual fields in 4- to 10-year-old children using Goldmann and double-arc perimeters. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 28:314-319
17. Quinn GE, Dobson V, Hardy RJ, Tung B, Phelps DL, Palmer EA (1996) Visual fields measured with double-arc perimetry in eyes with threshold retinopathy of prematurity from the cryotherapy for retinopathy of prematurity trial. The CRYO-Retinopathy of Prematurity Cooperative Group. Ophthalmology 103:1432-1437
18. Quinn GE, Miller DL, Evans JA, Tasman WE, McNamara JA, Schaffer DB (1996) Measurement of Goldmann visual fields in older children who received cryotherapy as infants for threshold retinopathy of prematurity. Arch Ophthalmol 114:425-428
19. Safran AB, Laffi GL, Bullinger A, Viviani P, de Weisse C, Desangles D, Tschopp C, Mermoud C (1996) Feasibility of automated visual field examination in children between 5 and 8 years of age. Br J Ophthalmol 80:515-518 (see comments)
20. Schwartz TL, Dobson V, Sandstrom DJ, van Hof-van Duin J (1987) Kinetic perimetry assessment of binocular visual field shape and size in young infants. Vision Res 27:2163-2175
21. Tschopp C, Safran AB, Viviani P, Bullinger A, Reicherts M, Mermoud C (1998) Automated visual field examination in children aged 5-8 years, Part I: Experimental validation of a testing procedure. Vision Res 38:2203-2210
22. Tschopp C, Safran AB, Viviani P, Reicherts M, Bullinger A, Mermoud C (1998) Automated visual field examination in children aged 5-8 years, Part II: Normative values. Vision Res 38:2211-2218
23. Tschopp C, Viviani P, Reicherts M, Bullinger A, Rudaz N, Mermoud C, Safran AB (1999) Does visual sensitivity improve between 5 and 8 years? A study of automated visual field examination. Vision Res 39:1107-1119
24. Wilson M, Quinn G, Dobson V, Breton M (1991) Normative values for visual fields in 4- to 12-year-old children using kinetic perimetry. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 28:151-153 (discussion 154)