Second-generation GMOs: Where to from here?

AgBioForum

Volumn 8, Issue 2-3, 2005, Pages 143-150

  Jefferson Moore, Kenrett Y ^a   Traxler, Greg ^b  

^a NORTH CAROLINA A AND T STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Equilibrium displacement modeling (EDM); High oil corn; Monopoly power; Value enhanced crops; Welfare analysis

Indexed keywords

ZEA MAYS;

EID: 25844518546     PISSN: 1522936X     EISSN: 1522936X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Alleman, J., Madden, G., & Savage, S. (2003). Dominant carrier market power in U.S. international telephone markets. Applied Economics, 35(6), 665-673.
2. Applelbaum, E. (1982). The estimation of the degree of oligopoly power. Journal of Econometrics, 19, 287-299.
3. Bhuyan, S. & Lopez, R.A. (1997). Oligopoly power in the food and tobacco industries. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 79(3), 1035-1044.
4. Boland, M., Domine, M., Dhuyvetter, K., & Herrman, T. (1999). Economic issues with value-enhanced corn. Manhattan, KS: Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service.
5. James, J.S., & Alston, J.M. (2002). Taxes and quality: A market-level analysis. Australian Journal of Agricultural & Resource Economics, 46(3), 417-445.
6. Kinnucan, H.W. (2003). Optimal generic advertising in an imperfectly competitive food industry with variable proportions. Agricultural Economics, 29(2), 143-158.
7. Kinnucan, H.W., & Paudel, L. (2001). Upstream effects of generic advertising: The case of catfish. Marine Resource Economics, 16(2), 83-107.
8. Lerner, A.P. (1934). The concept of monopoly and the measurement of monopoly power. Review of Economic Studies, 29, 291-299.
9. Lopez, R.A., & You, Z. (1993). Determinants of oligopsony power: The Haitian coffee case. Journal of Development Economics, 41(2), 275-284.
10. Muth, R.F. (1964). The derived demand curve for a productive factor and the industry supply curve. Oxford Economic Papers, 16(2), 221-34.
11. Penn, J.B. (2000). Biotechnology in the pipeline: Sparks companies' update. Proceedings of the 2000 Beltwide Cotton Conference. Memphis, TN: National Cotton Council.
12. United States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service. (1997). Biotechnology permits: 7 code of federal regulations part 340. Washington, DC: USDA. Available on the World Wide Web: http://www.aphis.usda.gov/brs/7cfr340.html.
13. United States Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service. (1999). Value-enhanced crops: Biotechnology's next stage. Agricultural Outlook, March 1999.
14. United States Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service. (2005). Data: Commodity costs & returns [database]. Washington, DC: USDA. Available on the World Wide Web: http://www.ers.usda.gov/Data/CostsAndReturns/ testpick.htm.
15. United States Department of Agriculture World Agricultural Outlook Board. (2000). World agricultural supply and demand estimates (WASDE-BB) [database]. Washington, DC: USDA. Available on the World Wide Web: http://jan.mannlib. cornell.edu/usda/reports/waobr/wasde-bb.
16. United States Grains Council. (2001). The 2000-2001 value-enhanced grains quality report. Washington, DC: Author. Available on the World Wide Web: http://www.vegrains.org.
17. United States Grains Council. (2002). The 2001-2002 value-enhanced grains quality report. Washington, DC: Author. Available on the World Wide Web: http://www.vegrains.org.
18. Wohlgenant, M.K. (1993). Distribution of gains from research and promotion in multi-stage production systems: The case of the U.S. beef and pork industries. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 75(3), 642-651.
19. Zhang, M., & Sexton, R. (2002). Optimal commodity promotion when downstream markets are imperfectly competitive. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 84(2), 352-65.